214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18273556)
1. A new method for ligand docking to flexible receptors by dual alanine scanning and refinement (SCARE).
Bottegoni G; Kufareva I; Totrov M; Abagyan R
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2008 May; 22(5):311-25. PubMed ID: 18273556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The utility of geometrical and chemical restraint information extracted from predicted ligand-binding sites in protein structure refinement.
Brylinski M; Lee SY; Zhou H; Skolnick J
J Struct Biol; 2011 Mar; 173(3):558-69. PubMed ID: 20850544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. FlexE: efficient molecular docking considering protein structure variations.
Claussen H; Buning C; Rarey M; Lengauer T
J Mol Biol; 2001 Apr; 308(2):377-95. PubMed ID: 11327774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. AutoDockFR: Advances in Protein-Ligand Docking with Explicitly Specified Binding Site Flexibility.
Ravindranath PA; Forli S; Goodsell DS; Olson AJ; Sanner MF
PLoS Comput Biol; 2015 Dec; 11(12):e1004586. PubMed ID: 26629955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Protein-protein docking with multiple residue conformations and residue substitutions.
Lorber DM; Udo MK; Shoichet BK
Protein Sci; 2002 Jun; 11(6):1393-408. PubMed ID: 12021438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Binary image representation of a ligand binding site: its application to efficient sampling of a conformational ensemble.
Sung E; Kim S; Shin W
BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 May; 11():256. PubMed ID: 20478076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes.
Cavasotto CN; Kovacs JA; Abagyan RA
J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Jul; 127(26):9632-40. PubMed ID: 15984891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preparation and refinement of model protein-ligand complexes.
Orry AJ; Abagyan R
Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 857():351-73. PubMed ID: 22323230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Flexible CDOCKER: Hybrid Searching Algorithm and Scoring Function with Side Chain Conformational Entropy.
Wu Y; Brooks CL
J Chem Inf Model; 2021 Nov; 61(11):5535-5549. PubMed ID: 34704754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Improving the Modeling of Extracellular Ligand Binding Pockets in RosettaGPCR for Conformational Selection.
Liessmann F; Künze G; Meiler J
Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Apr; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 37175495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visualisation of variable binding pockets on protein surfaces by probabilistic analysis of related structure sets.
Ashford P; Moss DS; Alex A; Yeap SK; Povia A; Nobeli I; Williams MA
BMC Bioinformatics; 2012 Mar; 13():39. PubMed ID: 22417279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Shape similarity guided pose prediction: lessons from D3R Grand Challenge 3.
Kumar A; Zhang KYJ
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2019 Jan; 33(1):47-59. PubMed ID: 30084081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Boosted neural networks scoring functions for accurate ligand docking and ranking.
Ashtawy HM; Mahapatra NR
J Bioinform Comput Biol; 2018 Apr; 16(2):1850004. PubMed ID: 29495922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ligand-biased ensemble receptor docking (LigBEnD): a hybrid ligand/receptor structure-based approach.
Lam PC; Abagyan R; Totrov M
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):187-198. PubMed ID: 28887659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.
Neves MA; Totrov M; Abagyan R
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 22569591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of protein conformation in docking: improved pose prediction through protein pocket adaptation.
Jain AN
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2009 Jun; 23(6):355-74. PubMed ID: 19340588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. FLIPDock: docking flexible ligands into flexible receptors.
Zhao Y; Sanner MF
Proteins; 2007 Aug; 68(3):726-37. PubMed ID: 17523154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CANDOCK: Chemical Atomic Network-Based Hierarchical Flexible Docking Algorithm Using Generalized Statistical Potentials.
Fine J; Konc J; Samudrala R; Chopra G
J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Mar; 60(3):1509-1527. PubMed ID: 32069042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structure-based identification of binding sites, native ligands and potential inhibitors for G-protein coupled receptors.
Cavasotto CN; Orry AJ; Abagyan RA
Proteins; 2003 May; 51(3):423-33. PubMed ID: 12696053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
