186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18274001)
1. Private health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
Dhalla I
Healthc Q; 2007; 10(4):89-96. PubMed ID: 18274001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Health care rights in Canada: the Chaoulli legacy.
Flood CM; Xavier S
Med Law; 2008 Sep; 27(3):617-44. PubMed ID: 19004386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Just Medicare: the role of Canadian courts in determining health care rights and access.
Flood CM
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 16686238
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Due process--right to medical access--Supreme Court of Canada holds that ban on private health insurance violates Quebec charter of human rights and freedoms--Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 S.C.C. 35, 29272, [2005] S.C.J. No. 33 QUICKLAW (June 9, 2005).
Harv Law Rev; 2005 Dec; 119(2):677-84. PubMed ID: 16489720
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Joe public v. the general public: the role of the courts in Israeli health care policy.
Shalev C; Chinitz D
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):650-9. PubMed ID: 16686236
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The government responds to the Chaoulli/Zeliotis judgment, easing open the door to privatization.
Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(5 Suppl):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16776035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
Ouellet R
CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Wait-time guarantees for health services: an analysis of Quebec's reaction to the Chaoulli Supreme Court decision.
Prémont MC
Health Law J; 2007; 15():43-86. PubMed ID: 19702180
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [The right to health care services under Quebec law].
Sprumont D
Health Law J; 1998; 6 Spec No():189-238. PubMed ID: 14746067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right.
Flood CM; Sullivan T
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.
Yeo M; Lucock C
Health Law J; 2006; 14():129-50. PubMed ID: 17563960
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
Eggertson L
CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare challenge heads to trial.
Vogel L
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E331-E332. PubMed ID: 27601607
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced suffering and increased productivity--the workers' compensation model.
Bhimji A
Healthc Pap; 2008; 8(3):30-3; discussion 52-4. PubMed ID: 18493173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rights to specialized health care in Norway: a normative perspective.
Norheim OF
J Law Med Ethics; 2005; 33(4):641-9. PubMed ID: 16686235
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. An American-Canadian neurologist returns to Canada.
Ross IB
Can J Neurol Sci; 2005 May; 32(2):265-6; author reply 266. PubMed ID: 16018170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Is there a human right to private health care?
Gross A
J Law Med Ethics; 2013; 41(1):138-46. PubMed ID: 23581662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Chaoulli Case: a two-tier Magna Carta?
Marchildon GP
Healthc Q; 2005; 8(4):49-52, 2. PubMed ID: 16323514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. BC refutes Charter challenge of medicare.
Mertl S
CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E369-E370. PubMed ID: 27647614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The construction of health care and the ideology of the private in Canadian constitutional law.
Lessard H
Ann Health Law; 1993; 2():121-59. PubMed ID: 10139964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
