These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18274470)

  • 1. Analysis of primary and permanent molars prepared with high speed and ultrasonic abrasion systems.
    Pedro Rde L; Antunes LA; Vieira AS; Maia LC
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2007; 32(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 18274470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effectiveness of high speed instrument and air abrasion on different dental substrates.
    Antunes LA; Pedro RL; Vieira AS; Maia LC
    Braz Oral Res; 2008; 22(3):235-41. PubMed ID: 18949309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Topography and presence of a smear layer in deciduous molars prepared with high-speed cutting and ultrasonic abrasion: an in-vitro study.
    Vieira ÁS; Pedro Rde L; Antunes Ldos S; Alves Dos Santos MP; Antunes LA; Primo LG; Maia LC
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2011 May; 69(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 21254956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion.
    Aysegül O; Nurhan O; Haluk B; Dilek T
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of etching agent on dentinal adhesive interface in primary teeth.
    Rontani RM; Ducatti CH; Garcia-Godoy F; De Goes MF
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2000; 24(3):205-9. PubMed ID: 11314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Newer Class I cavity preparation for permanent teeth using air abrasion and composite restoration.
    Ferdianakis K; White GE
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1999; 23(3):201-16. PubMed ID: 10686867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dentin Topographic Features following Chemomechanical Caries Removal in Primary Teeth.
    Kotb RM; Elkateb MA; Ahmed AM; Kawana KY; El Meligy OA
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2016; 40(6):472-479. PubMed ID: 27805895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hybrid layer thickness and morphology: Influence of cavity preparation with air abrasion.
    Barceleiro MO; de Mello JB; Porto CL; Dias KR; de Miranda MS
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e242-7. PubMed ID: 22313931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Stiesch-Scholz M; Hannig M
    J Adhes Dent; 2000; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
    Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative cutting effectiveness of an ultrasonic diamond tip and a high-speed diamond bur.
    Lima LM; Motisuki C; Corat EJ; Santos-Pinto L
    Minerva Stomatol; 2009 Mar; 58(3):93-8. PubMed ID: 19357615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinetic cavity preparation effects on secondary caries formation around resin restorations: a polarized light microscopic in vitro evaluation.
    Hicks MJ; Parkins FM; Flaitz CM
    ASDC J Dent Child; 2001; 68(2):115-21, 80, 142. PubMed ID: 11475686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A scanning electron microscopic study of different caries removal techniques on human dentin.
    Yazici AR; Ozgünaltay G; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):360-6. PubMed ID: 12120773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficacy of two methods for restorative materials' removal in primary teeth.
    Bittar DG; Murakami C; Hesse D; Imparato JC; Mendes FM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Sep; 12(5):372-8. PubMed ID: 22269199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Influence of ultrasound and diamond burs treatments on microtensile bond strength.
    Conde A; Mainieri V; Mota EG; Oshima HM
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):373-7. PubMed ID: 23059576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of rotary instrumentation and different etchants on removal of smear layer on human dentin.
    Ayad MF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jan; 85(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 11174681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of airborne particle abrasion on the dentin smear layer and dentin: an in vitro investigation.
    Bester SP; de Wet FA; Nel JC; Driessen CH
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 7710624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Immediate dentin sealing of onlay preparations: thickness of pre-cured Dentin Bonding Agent and effect of surface cleaning.
    Stavridakis MM; Krejci I; Magne P
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(6):747-57. PubMed ID: 16382598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of Smear Layers Created by Different Burs on Durability of Self-Etching Adhesive Bond to Dentin of Primary Teeth.
    Rirattanapong P; Senawongse P; Harnirattisal C; Wunsiw W
    J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2015; 39(3):224-30. PubMed ID: 26208066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Scanning electron micrographic effects of air-abrasion cavity preparation on human enamel and dentin.
    Laurell KA; Hess JA
    Quintessence Int; 1995 Feb; 26(2):139-44. PubMed ID: 7568724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.