These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

758 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18275003)

  • 1. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis?
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Syst Biol; 2008 Feb; 57(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 18275003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The devil in the details: interactions between the branch-length prior and likelihood model affect node support and branch lengths in the phylogeny of the Psoraceae.
    Ekman S; Blaalid R
    Syst Biol; 2011 Jul; 60(4):541-61. PubMed ID: 21436107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of parameter estimation on maximum-likelihood bootstrap analysis.
    Ripplinger J; Abdo Z; Sullivan J
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2010 Aug; 56(2):642-8. PubMed ID: 20434567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets.
    Buckley TR
    Syst Biol; 2002 Jun; 51(3):509-23. PubMed ID: 12079647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Empirical problems of the hierarchical likelihood ratio test for model selection.
    Pol D
    Syst Biol; 2004 Dec; 53(6):949-62. PubMed ID: 15764562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of hummingbirds: Bayesian and maximum likelihood analyses of partitioned data and selection of an appropriate partitioning strategy.
    McGuire JA; Witt CC; Altshuler DL; Remsen JV
    Syst Biol; 2007 Oct; 56(5):837-56. PubMed ID: 17934998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of branch length variation on the selection of models of molecular evolution.
    Posada D
    J Mol Evol; 2001 May; 52(5):434-44. PubMed ID: 11443347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When being "most likely" is not enough: examining the performance of three uses of the parametric bootstrap in phylogenetics.
    Antezana M
    J Mol Evol; 2003 Feb; 56(2):198-222. PubMed ID: 12574867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model selection for mixtures of mutagenetic trees.
    Yin J; Beerenwinkel N; Rahnenführer J; Lengauer T
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article17. PubMed ID: 17049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Failed refutations: further comments on parsimony and likelihood methods and their relationship to Popper's degree of corroboration.
    de Queiroz K; Poe S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Jun; 52(3):352-67. PubMed ID: 12775524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Least and most powerful phylogenetic tests to elucidate the origin of the seed plants in the presence of conflicting signals under misspecified models.
    Aris-Brosou S
    Syst Biol; 2003 Dec; 52(6):781-93. PubMed ID: 14668117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Phylogenetic relationships and heterogeneous evolutionary processes among phrynosomatine sand lizards (Squamata, Iguanidae) revisited.
    Schulte JA; de Queiroz K
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 May; 47(2):700-16. PubMed ID: 18362078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An examination of the monophyly of morning glory taxa using Bayesian phylogenetic inference.
    Miller RE; Buckley TR; Manos PS
    Syst Biol; 2002 Oct; 51(5):740-53. PubMed ID: 12396588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Mitochondrial sequence data and Dipsacales phylogeny: mixed models, partitioned Bayesian analyses, and model selection.
    Winkworth RC; Bell CD; Donoghue MJ
    Mol Phylogenet Evol; 2008 Mar; 46(3):830-43. PubMed ID: 18255318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data.
    Waddell PJ; Kishino H; Ota R
    Genome Inform; 2002; 13():82-92. PubMed ID: 14571377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. SuperTRI: A new approach based on branch support analyses of multiple independent data sets for assessing reliability of phylogenetic inferences.
    Ropiquet A; Li B; Hassanin A
    C R Biol; 2009 Sep; 332(9):832-47. PubMed ID: 19748458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Calculating the evolutionary rates of different genes: a fast, accurate estimator with applications to maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis.
    Bevan RB; Lang BF; Bryant D
    Syst Biol; 2005 Dec; 54(6):900-15. PubMed ID: 16282169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular systematics of the Eastern Fence Lizard (Sceloporus undulatus): a comparison of Parsimony, Likelihood, and Bayesian approaches.
    Leaché AD; Reeder TW
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):44-68. PubMed ID: 11943092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Combined data, Bayesian phylogenetics, and the origin of the New Zealand cicada genera.
    Buckley TR; Arensburger P; Simon C; Chambers GK
    Syst Biol; 2002 Feb; 51(1):4-18. PubMed ID: 11943089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A partitioned likelihood analysis of swallowtail butterfly phylogeny (Lepidoptera:Papilionidae).
    Caterino MS; Reed RD; Kuo MM; Sperling FA
    Syst Biol; 2001 Feb; 50(1):106-27. PubMed ID: 12116588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.