These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18275034)

  • 1. Are the Brookhill-Wilk patents impediments to market growth in cybersurgery?
    McLean TR; Torrance AW
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Mar; 4(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 18275034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The legal and economic forces that will shape the international market for cybersurgery.
    McLean TR
    Int J Med Robot; 2006 Dec; 2(4):293-8. PubMed ID: 17520646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The complexity of litigation associated with robotic surgery and cybersurgery.
    McLean T
    Int J Med Robot; 2007 Mar; 3():23-9. PubMed ID: 17441022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Recent Supreme Court decisions and licensing power.
    Giordano-Coltart J; Calkins CW
    Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Feb; 26(2):183-5. PubMed ID: 18259170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protecting new ideas and inventions in nanomedicine with patents.
    Bawa R; Bawa SR; Maebius SB; Flynn T; Wei C
    Nanomedicine; 2005 Jun; 1(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 17292072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. US courts narrow patent exemptions.
    Fox JL
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Aug; 21(8):834. PubMed ID: 12894182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The coming US patent opposition.
    Apple T
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 Feb; 23(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 15696151
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal and ethical issues in robotic surgery.
    Mavroforou A; Michalodimitrakis E; Hatzitheo-Filou C; Giannoukas A
    Int Angiol; 2010 Feb; 29(1):75-9. PubMed ID: 20224537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The use of Food and Drug Administration 510(k) notifications in patent litigation.
    Tolomeo DE
    Food Drug Law J; 2004; 59(4):465-77. PubMed ID: 15875346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Patent first, ask questions later: morality and biotechnology in patent law.
    Bagley MA
    William Mary Law Rev; 2003 Dec; 45(2):469-547. PubMed ID: 15570677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 364 May 2007. Patents, medicine, and the interests of patients.
    Committees on Ethics and Genetics of American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 109(5):1249-54. PubMed ID: 17470613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Whose body is it anyway? Human cells and the strange effects of property and intellectual property law.
    Feldman R
    Stanford Law Rev; 2011 Jun; 63(6):1377-402. PubMed ID: 21774193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enzo Biochem v. Gen-Probe: complying with the written description requirement under US patent law.
    Blaug S; Shuster M; Su H
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Jan; 21(1):97-9. PubMed ID: 12511910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biotechs sue Columbia over fourth Axel patent.
    Howard K
    Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):955-6. PubMed ID: 12949538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Innovation and patents: in vitro diagnostics.
    Carter S
    Med Device Technol; 2003 May; 14(4):24. PubMed ID: 12774574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ACOG. Committee opinion: number 277, November 2002. Patients, medicine and the interests of patients: applying general principles to gene patenting.
    Comittee on Ethics, Comittee on Genetics, The American College of Obstetrician and Gynecologists
    Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Nov; 100(5 Pt 1):1051-6. PubMed ID: 12434779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. US court case to define EST patentability.
    Lawrence S
    Nat Biotechnol; 2005 May; 23(5):513. PubMed ID: 15877055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Patent law--balancing profit maximization and public access to technology.
    Beckerman-Rodau A
    Columbia Sci Technol Law Rev; 2003; 4():E1. PubMed ID: 15977333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Have a surgical robot, why not provide cybersurgery?
    McLean TR; McLean PB; McLean AB
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2008 Mar; 5(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 18331172
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Australia experiments with 'experimental use' exemption.
    McBratney A; Nielsen K; McMillan F
    Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Aug; 22(8):1023-5. PubMed ID: 15286651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.