723 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18275868)
1. Absorbed radiation dose of the female breast during diagnostic multidetector chest CT and dose reduction with a tungsten-antimony composite breast shield: preliminary results.
Parker MS; Kelleher NM; Hoots JA; Chung JK; Fatouros PP; Benedict SH
Clin Radiol; 2008 Mar; 63(3):278-88. PubMed ID: 18275868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Female breast radiation exposure during thorax multidetector computed tomography and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield to reduce breast radiation dose.
Yilmaz MH; Albayram S; Yaşar D; Ozer H; Adaletli I; Selçuk D; Akman C; Altuğ A
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(1):138-42. PubMed ID: 17259846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms.
DeMarco JJ; Cagnon CH; Cody DD; Stevens DM; McCollough CH; O'Daniel J; McNitt-Gray MF
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Sep; 50(17):3989-4004. PubMed ID: 16177525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Chest CT performed with 3D and z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique: breast and effective doses.
Matsubara K; Takata T; Koshida K; Noto K; Shimono T; Horii J; Yamamoto T; Matsui O
Acad Radiol; 2009 Apr; 16(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19268857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fetal shielding combined with state of the art CT dose reduction strategies during maternal chest CT.
Chatterson LC; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Hunt MM; Webster S; Lim H
Eur J Radiol; 2014 Jul; 83(7):1199-1204. PubMed ID: 24838282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dose reduction to radiosensitive tissues in CT. Do commercially available shields meet the users' needs?
McLaughlin DJ; Mooney RB
Clin Radiol; 2004 May; 59(5):446-50. PubMed ID: 15081850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lead versus bismuth-antimony shield for fetal dose reduction at different gestational ages at CT pulmonary angiography.
Chatterson LC; Leswick DA; Fladeland DA; Hunt MM; Webster ST
Radiology; 2011 Aug; 260(2):560-7. PubMed ID: 21555348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary calcium scoring with MDCT: the radiation dose to the breast and the effectiveness of bismuth breast shield.
Yilmaz MH; Yaşar D; Albayram S; Adaletli I; Ozer H; Ozbayrak M; Mihmanli I; Akman C
Eur J Radiol; 2007 Jan; 61(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 16962280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation dose to the thyroid gland and breast from multidetector computed tomography of the cervical spine: does bismuth shielding with and without a cervical collar reduce dose?
Gunn ML; Kanal KM; Kolokythas O; Anzai Y
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(6):987-90. PubMed ID: 19940673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual energy CT of the chest: how about the dose?
Schenzle JC; Sommer WH; Neumaier K; Michalski G; Lechel U; Nikolaou K; Becker CR; Reiser MF; Johnson TR
Invest Radiol; 2010 Jun; 45(6):347-53. PubMed ID: 20404737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Protection of eye lens in computed tomography--dose evaluation on an anthropomorphic phantom using thermo-luminescent dosimeters and Monte-Carlo simulations].
Keil B; Wulff J; Schmitt R; Auvanis D; Danova D; Heverhagen JT; Fiebich M; Madsack B; Leppek R; Klose KJ; Zink K
Rofo; 2008 Dec; 180(12):1047-53. PubMed ID: 19235699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of organ absorbed doses and estimation of effective doses from pediatric anthropomorphic phantom measurements for multi-detector row CT with and without automatic exposure control.
Brisse HJ; Robilliard M; Savignoni A; Pierrat N; Gaboriaud G; De Rycke Y; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC
Health Phys; 2009 Oct; 97(4):303-14. PubMed ID: 19741359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Direct quantification of breast dose during coronary CT angiography and evaluation of dose reduction strategies.
Abadi S; Mehrez H; Ursani A; Parker M; Paul N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):W152-8. PubMed ID: 21257856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Does the lead apron and collar always reduce radiation dose?
Nortje CJ; Harris AM; Lackovic KP; Wood RE
SADJ; 2001 Nov; 56(11):502-4. PubMed ID: 11885424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose reduction and image quality assessment in MDCT using AEC (D-DOM & Z-DOM) and in-plane bismuth shielding.
Lee K; Lee W; Lee J; Lee B; Oh G
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Sep; 141(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 20511402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of radiation doses between cone beam CT and multi detector CT: TLD measurements.
Kim S; Yoshizumi TT; Toncheva G; Yoo S; Yin FF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 132(3):339-45. PubMed ID: 19074786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of breast absorbed doses during thoracic computed tomography scan to evaluate the effectiveness of bismuth shielding.
Alonso TC; Mourão AP; Santana PC; da Silva TA
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():55-57. PubMed ID: 27033028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breast surface radiation dose during coronary CT angiography: reduction by breast displacement and lead shielding.
Foley SJ; McEntee MF; Achenbach S; Brennan PC; Rainford LS; Dodd JD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Aug; 197(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 21785082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.
James JR; Pavlicek W; Hanson JA; Boltz TF; Patel BK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Feb; 208(2):362-372. PubMed ID: 28112559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Physical phantom of typical Korean male for radiation protection purpose.
Kim JI; Choi H; Lee BI; Lim YK; Kim CS; Lee JK; Lee C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2006; 118(1):131-6. PubMed ID: 16410295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
