641 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18276027)
1. Dynamic movement of N100m current sources in auditory evoked fields: comparison of ipsilateral versus contralateral responses in human auditory cortex.
Jin CY; Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Hashimoto I
Neurosci Res; 2008 Apr; 60(4):397-405. PubMed ID: 18276027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Late auditory evoked potentials asymmetry revisited.
Hine J; Debener S
Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Jun; 118(6):1274-85. PubMed ID: 17462945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Interhemispheric differences of the middle latency auditory evoked magnetic fields revealed by a whole head magnetoencephalography system].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1995 Oct; 47(10):989-94. PubMed ID: 7577145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Side of the stimulated ear influences the hemispheric balance in coding tonal stimuli.
Yu HY; Chen JT; Wu ZA; Yeh TC; Ho LT; Lin YY
Neurol Res; 2007 Jul; 29(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 17535555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dynamic movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects sequential activation of isofrequency bands in human auditory cortex.
Ozaki I; Suzuki Y; Jin CY; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
Clin Neurophysiol; 2003 Sep; 114(9):1681-8. PubMed ID: 12948797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of the task of categorizing FM direction on auditory evoked magnetic fields in the human auditory cortex.
König R; Sieluzycki C; Simserides C; Heil P; Scheich H
Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 1220():102-17. PubMed ID: 18420183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Auditory evoked magnetic fields in patients with absent brainstem responses due to auditory neuropathy with optic atrophy.
Takata Y; Kawase T; Nakasato N; Kanno A; Kobayashi T
Clin Neurophysiol; 2012 May; 123(5):985-92. PubMed ID: 22119798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex.
Gabriel D; Veuillet E; Ragot R; Schwartz D; Ducorps A; Norena A; Durrant JD; Bonmartin A; Cotton F; Collet L
Hear Res; 2004 Nov; 197(1-2):55-64. PubMed ID: 15504604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Interhemispheric asymmetry exists in female in the N100m source position of the auditory evoked magnetic fields].
Kanno A; Nakasato N; Hatanaka K; Ohtomo S; Suzuki K; Fujiwara S; Shirane R; Yoshimoto T
No To Shinkei; 1998 Apr; 50(4):367-71. PubMed ID: 9592827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Human auditory steady state responses to binaural and monaural beats.
Schwarz DW; Taylor P
Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Mar; 116(3):658-68. PubMed ID: 15721080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Reduced hemispheric asymmetry of the auditory N260m in dyslexia.
Paul I; Bott C; Heim S; Eulitz C; Elbert T
Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(5):785-94. PubMed ID: 16129458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Time course and hemispheric lateralization effects of complex pitch processing: evoked magnetic fields in response to rippled noise stimuli.
Hertrich I; Mathiak K; Lutzenberger W; Ackermann H
Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(13):1814-26. PubMed ID: 15351630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dynamic anterolateral movement of N100m dipoles in evoked magnetic field reflects activation of isofrequency bands through horizontal fibers in human auditory cortex.
Ozaki I; Jin YC; Suzuki Y; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
Neurosci Lett; 2002 Aug; 329(2):222-6. PubMed ID: 12165417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Neuromagnetic recordings reveal the temporal dynamics of auditory spatial processing in the human cortex.
Tiitinen H; Salminen NH; Palomäki KJ; Mäkinen VT; Alku P; May PJ
Neurosci Lett; 2006 Mar; 396(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 16343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Auditory magnetic response to clicks in children and adults: its components, hemispheric lateralization and repetition suppression effect.
Orekhova EV; Butorina AV; Tsetlin MM; Novikova SI; Sokolov PA; Elam M; Stroganova TA
Brain Topogr; 2013 Jul; 26(3):410-27. PubMed ID: 23104186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Right hemispheric laterality of human 40 Hz auditory steady-state responses.
Ross B; Herdman AT; Pantev C
Cereb Cortex; 2005 Dec; 15(12):2029-39. PubMed ID: 15772375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Auditory evoked fields differentially encode speech features: an MEG investigation of the P50m and N100m time courses during syllable processing.
Tavabi K; Obleser J; Dobel C; Pantev C
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 May; 25(10):3155-62. PubMed ID: 17561829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
