986 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18276853)
1. "Glocal" science advocacy.
Leshner AI
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5865):877. PubMed ID: 18276853
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. U.S. science policy. Nobelists go four-on-one with Cheney.
Kaiser J
Science; 2003 Nov; 302(5650):1487. PubMed ID: 14645816
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. U.S. science policy. GOP takes Senate, budget uncertain.
Malakoff D
Science; 2002 Nov; 298(5597):1313. PubMed ID: 12434024
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. U.S. science budget. Science agencies caught in postelection spending squeeze.
Lawler A; Mervis J
Science; 2004 Dec; 306(5702):1662-3. PubMed ID: 15576575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. U.S. science policy. The battle over the 2011 budget: what's at stake for research.
Mervis J
Science; 2011 Jan; 331(6013):14-5. PubMed ID: 21212327
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Under new management.
Macilwain C
Nature; 2001 Dec 20-27; 414(6866):839. PubMed ID: 11780025
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Election impasse leaves science in the dark.
Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Nov; 408(6810):279. PubMed ID: 11099007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Science policy. Caught in the squeeze.
Mervis J
Science; 2005 Feb; 307(5711):832-4. PubMed ID: 15705818
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinton's farewell gift to US science agencies.
Macilwain C; Reichhardt T; Smaglik P
Nature; 2000 Feb; 403(6770):585. PubMed ID: 10688168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. U.S. science policy. Meet two new science spending cardinals in Congress.
Mervis J
Science; 2015 Jan; 347(6221):466-7. PubMed ID: 25635067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Gore pledges support for bioscience.
Wadman M
Nature; 2000 Sep; 407(6801):118. PubMed ID: 11001023
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Science policy. A budget with big winners and losers.
Kintisch E; Mervis J
Science; 2006 Feb; 311(5762):762-4. PubMed ID: 16469890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Research funding. Politics and funding in the U.S. public biomedical R&D system.
Hegde D; Mowery DC
Science; 2008 Dec; 322(5909):1797-8. PubMed ID: 19095928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. U.S. science policy. Bush victory leaves scars--and concerns about funding.
Mervis J
Science; 2004 Nov; 306(5699):1110-3. PubMed ID: 15539568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. U.S. budget 2009. A science budget of choices and chances.
Mervis J
Science; 2008 Feb; 319(5864):714-5. PubMed ID: 18258869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. First Bush budget set to favour life sciences.
Davis M
Nature; 2001 Feb; 409(6823):969. PubMed ID: 11234034
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Public money, public values.
Abrams SE
Public Health Nurs; 2004; 21(6):511-2. PubMed ID: 15566554
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. A look inside the National Cancer Institute budget process: implications for 2007 and beyond.
Niederhuber JE
Cancer Res; 2007 Feb; 67(3):856-62. PubMed ID: 17283113
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Republicans seek freeze on health research.
Wadman M
Nature; 1996 May; 381(6579):177. PubMed ID: 8622745
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. 1997 budget confirms US science faces a period of flat funding.
Macilwain C
Nature; 1996 Mar; 380(6571):187. PubMed ID: 8637559
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
