These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18277342)

  • 1. Compression bandages: influence of techniques of use on their clinical efficiency and tolerance.
    Benigni JP; Uhl JF; Cornu-Thénard A; Blin E
    Int Angiol; 2008 Feb; 27(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 18277342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of elasticity on subbandage pressure of three layer tubular compression bandages in healthy volunteers: a RCT.
    Weller C; Jolley D; Wolfe R; Myers K; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Oct; 19(10):417, 420-3. PubMed ID: 20948489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of pressure change on standing as a surrogate measure of the stiffness of a compression bandage.
    Partsch H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 30(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 16009577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different materials in multicomponent bandages on pressure and stiffness of the final bandage.
    Mosti G; Mattaliano V; Partsch H
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 18261104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compression therapy: effects of posture and application techniques on initial pressures delivered by bandages of different physical properties.
    Lee AJ; Dale JJ; Ruckley CV; Gibson B; Prescott RJ; Brown D
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 May; 31(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 16387515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Elastic compression by calibrated bandage].
    Parpex P
    Phlebologie; 1984; 37(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 6473530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects.
    Partsch H; Clark M; Mosti G; Steinlechner E; Schuren J; Abel M; Benigni JP; Coleridge-Smith P; Cornu-Thénard A; Flour M; Hutchinson J; Gamble J; Issberner K; Juenger M; Moffatt C; Neumann HA; Rabe E; Uhl JF; Zimmet S
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):600-9. PubMed ID: 18261106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating the pressure under compression bandages for venous leg ulcers.
    Hansson C; Swanbeck G
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 2455419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages.
    Mosti GB; Mattaliano V
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17234436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of pressure measurements for tubular bandaging material and compression bandages].
    Häfner HM; Götzke N; Rohnen R; Jünger M
    Hautarzt; 2001 Oct; 52(10):867-72. PubMed ID: 17690815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class-3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: comparison of spiral and figure-of-eight techniques.
    Coull A; Tolson D; McIntosh J
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 May; 54(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 16629912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled, comparative study of relation between volume changes and interface pressure under short-stretch bandages in leg lymphedema patients.
    Damstra RJ; Brouwer ER; Partsch H
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):773-8; discussion 778-9. PubMed ID: 18336577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface pressure and stiffness in different combinations of compression material.
    Hirai M; Koyama A; Miyazaki K; Iwata H; Kominami Y
    Phlebology; 2012 Mar; 27(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 21893551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg.
    Dale JJ; Ruckley CV; Gibson B; Brown D; Lee AJ; Prescott RJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 27(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 14652845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo measurement of compression bandage interface pressures: the first study.
    Rimaud D; Convert R; Calmels P
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2014; 57(6-7):394-408. PubMed ID: 25193773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of bandage thickness on interface pressure applied by compression bandages.
    Al Khaburi J; Dehghani-Sanij AA; Nelson EA; Hutchinson J
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 21862377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of sub-bandage pressures achieved by 3 abdominal bandaging techniques in horses.
    Canada NC; Beard WL; Guyan ME; White BJ
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Sep; 47(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 25124529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters.
    Satpathy A; Hayes S; Dodds SR
    J Wound Care; 2006 Mar; 15(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 16550667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of multilayered compression bandages on sub-bandage interface pressure: a model.
    Al Khaburi J; Nelson EA; Hutchinson J; Dehghani-Sanij AA
    Phlebology; 2011 Mar; 26(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 21368218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of multilayer bandage systems during rest, exercise, and over 2 days of wear time.
    Hafner J; Botonakis I; Burg G
    Arch Dermatol; 2000 Jul; 136(7):857-63. PubMed ID: 10890987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.