BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18277342)

  • 1. Compression bandages: influence of techniques of use on their clinical efficiency and tolerance.
    Benigni JP; Uhl JF; Cornu-Thénard A; Blin E
    Int Angiol; 2008 Feb; 27(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 18277342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of elasticity on subbandage pressure of three layer tubular compression bandages in healthy volunteers: a RCT.
    Weller C; Jolley D; Wolfe R; Myers K; McNeil J
    J Wound Care; 2010 Oct; 19(10):417, 420-3. PubMed ID: 20948489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of pressure change on standing as a surrogate measure of the stiffness of a compression bandage.
    Partsch H
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2005 Oct; 30(4):415-21. PubMed ID: 16009577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Influence of different materials in multicomponent bandages on pressure and stiffness of the final bandage.
    Mosti G; Mattaliano V; Partsch H
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):631-9. PubMed ID: 18261104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compression therapy: effects of posture and application techniques on initial pressures delivered by bandages of different physical properties.
    Lee AJ; Dale JJ; Ruckley CV; Gibson B; Prescott RJ; Brown D
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2006 May; 31(5):542-52. PubMed ID: 16387515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Elastic compression by calibrated bandage].
    Parpex P
    Phlebologie; 1984; 37(2):225-8. PubMed ID: 6473530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Classification of compression bandages: practical aspects.
    Partsch H; Clark M; Mosti G; Steinlechner E; Schuren J; Abel M; Benigni JP; Coleridge-Smith P; Cornu-Thénard A; Flour M; Hutchinson J; Gamble J; Issberner K; Juenger M; Moffatt C; Neumann HA; Rabe E; Uhl JF; Zimmet S
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 May; 34(5):600-9. PubMed ID: 18261106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Regulating the pressure under compression bandages for venous leg ulcers.
    Hansson C; Swanbeck G
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1988; 68(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 2455419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Simultaneous changes of leg circumference and interface pressure under different compression bandages.
    Mosti GB; Mattaliano V
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 33(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 17234436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Comparison of pressure measurements for tubular bandaging material and compression bandages].
    Häfner HM; Götzke N; Rohnen R; Jünger M
    Hautarzt; 2001 Oct; 52(10):867-72. PubMed ID: 17690815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class-3c compression bandaging for venous ulcers: comparison of spiral and figure-of-eight techniques.
    Coull A; Tolson D; McIntosh J
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 May; 54(3):274-83. PubMed ID: 16629912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Controlled, comparative study of relation between volume changes and interface pressure under short-stretch bandages in leg lymphedema patients.
    Damstra RJ; Brouwer ER; Partsch H
    Dermatol Surg; 2008 Jun; 34(6):773-8; discussion 778-9. PubMed ID: 18336577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interface pressure and stiffness in different combinations of compression material.
    Hirai M; Koyama A; Miyazaki K; Iwata H; Kominami Y
    Phlebology; 2012 Mar; 27(2):82-9. PubMed ID: 21893551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multi-layer compression: comparison of four different four-layer bandage systems applied to the leg.
    Dale JJ; Ruckley CV; Gibson B; Brown D; Lee AJ; Prescott RJ
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2004 Jan; 27(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 14652845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In vivo measurement of compression bandage interface pressures: the first study.
    Rimaud D; Convert R; Calmels P
    Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2014; 57(6-7):394-408. PubMed ID: 25193773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of bandage thickness on interface pressure applied by compression bandages.
    Al Khaburi J; Dehghani-Sanij AA; Nelson EA; Hutchinson J
    Med Eng Phys; 2012 Apr; 34(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 21862377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of sub-bandage pressures achieved by 3 abdominal bandaging techniques in horses.
    Canada NC; Beard WL; Guyan ME; White BJ
    Equine Vet J; 2015 Sep; 47(5):599-602. PubMed ID: 25124529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Measuring sub-bandage pressure: comparing the use of pressure monitors and pulse oximeters.
    Satpathy A; Hayes S; Dodds SR
    J Wound Care; 2006 Mar; 15(3):125-8. PubMed ID: 16550667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impact of multilayered compression bandages on sub-bandage interface pressure: a model.
    Al Khaburi J; Nelson EA; Hutchinson J; Dehghani-Sanij AA
    Phlebology; 2011 Mar; 26(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 21368218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of multilayer bandage systems during rest, exercise, and over 2 days of wear time.
    Hafner J; Botonakis I; Burg G
    Arch Dermatol; 2000 Jul; 136(7):857-63. PubMed ID: 10890987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.