BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18277342)

  • 41. [Formation of compressive bandage after sclerotherapy for lower limb varices].
    Zatonskikh BIa; Banas NB
    Angiol Sosud Khir; 2003; 9(4):72-4. PubMed ID: 14657915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Loss of interface pressure in various compression bandage systems over seven days.
    Protz K; Heyer K; Verheyen-Cronau I; Augustin M
    Dermatology; 2014; 229(4):343-52. PubMed ID: 25412920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Measuring sub-bandage pressure.
    Thomas S
    J Wound Care; 2000 Nov; 9(10):491-2. PubMed ID: 11933455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of techniques for treating the bleeding wound.
    Naimer SA; Anat N; Katif G;
    Injury; 2004 Oct; 35(10):974-9. PubMed ID: 15351660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Subbandage pressure measurements comparing a long-stretch with a short-stretch compression bandage.
    Danielsen L; Madsen M; Henriksen L; Sindrup J; Petersen L
    Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 May; 78(3):201-4. PubMed ID: 9602227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Comparison of the interface pressure and stiffness of four types of compression systems.
    Wong IK; Man MB; Chan OS; Siu FC; Abel M; Andriessen A
    J Wound Care; 2012 Apr; 21(4):161, 164, 166-7. PubMed ID: 22584673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Development of a device to determine the stiffness of elastic garments and bandages.
    Hirai M; Niimi K; Miyazaki K; Iwata H; Sugimoto I; Ishibashi H; Ota T; Kominami Y
    Phlebology; 2011 Oct; 26(7):285-91. PubMed ID: 21478139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Measurement of distal limb sub-bandage pressure over 96 hours in horses.
    Canada NC; Beard WL; Guyan ME; White BJ
    Equine Vet J; 2017 May; 49(3):329-333. PubMed ID: 27289022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Study of the effect of composition and construction of material on sub-bandage pressure during dynamic loading of a limb in vitro.
    Kumar B; Das A; Alagirusamy R
    Biorheology; 2013; 50(1-2):83-94. PubMed ID: 23619155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Impact of variation in limb shape on sub-bandage interface pressure.
    Al Khaburi J; Nelson EA; Hutchinson J; Dehghani-Sanij AA
    Phlebology; 2011 Feb; 26(1):20-8. PubMed ID: 20881308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Short-stretch compression bandages and the foot pump.
    Lindsay E; Muldoon J; Hampton S
    Nurs Times; 2003 Jun 24-30; 99(25):60-1. PubMed ID: 12861646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Comparison of stiffness and interface pressure during rest and exercise among various arm sleeves.
    Hirai M; Niimi K; Iwata H; Sugimoto I; Ishibashi H; Ota T; Nakamura H
    Phlebology; 2010 Aug; 25(4):196-200. PubMed ID: 20656958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Evaluation of the Esmark bandage as a tourniquet for forefoot surgery.
    Grebing BR; Coughlin MJ
    Foot Ankle Int; 2004 Jun; 25(6):397-405. PubMed ID: 15215024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Reproducibility of repeated measurements with the Kikuhime pressure sensor under pressure garments in burn scar treatment.
    Van den Kerckhove E; Fieuws S; Massagé P; Hierner R; Boeckx W; Deleuze JP; Laperre J; Anthonissen M
    Burns; 2007 Aug; 33(5):572-8. PubMed ID: 17182191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Compression devices for decongestion therapy : A cross-sectional observational survey of handling, pressure, and comfort].
    Protz K; Reich-Schupke S; Klose K; Augustin M; Heyer K
    Hautarzt; 2018 Mar; 69(3):232-241. PubMed ID: 29184983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Analysis of factors governing dynamic stiffness index of medical compression bandages.
    Kumar B; Das A; Alagirusamy R
    Biorheology; 2012; 49(5-6):375-84. PubMed ID: 23380903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. High-compression bandages.
    Thomas S
    J Wound Care; 1996 Jan; 5(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 8697128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison in the interface pressure under self-adherent and non-self-adherent bandages during standing and exercise.
    Hirai M
    Vasa; 1998 Nov; 27(4):233-5. PubMed ID: 9859744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Adjustable compression wraps: stretch, interface pressures and static stiffness indices.
    Benigni JP; Uhl JF; Filori P; Balet F; Penoel L
    Int Angiol; 2023 Jun; 42(3):247-253. PubMed ID: 36795457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Mathematical modeling to predict the sub-bandage pressure on a conical limb for multi-layer bandaging.
    Sikka MP; Ghosh S; Mukhopadhyay A
    Med Eng Phys; 2016 Sep; 38(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 27263065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.