These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Exploring the role of attention during memory retrieval: effects of semantic encoding and divided attention. Lozito JP; Mulligan NW Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):986-98. PubMed ID: 17128598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The access of relevant information for solving problems. Ross BH; Ryan WJ; Tenpenny PL Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):639-51. PubMed ID: 2796748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An asymmetry between memory encoding and retrieval. Revelation, generation, and transfer-appropriate processing. Mulligan NW; Lozito JP Psychol Sci; 2006 Jan; 17(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 16371137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Components of Stroop-like interference in word reading. La Heij W; Happel B; Mulder M Acta Psychol (Amst); 1990 Mar; 73(2):115-29. PubMed ID: 2343768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A pattern recognition account of decision making. Massaro DW Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):616-27. PubMed ID: 7968557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mental representation of three-dimensional objects in visual problem solving and recognition. Cooper LA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1990 Nov; 16(6):1097-106. PubMed ID: 2148582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cumulating retrieval inhibition in semantic and lexical domains. Brown AS; Zoccoli SL; Leahy MM J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):496-507. PubMed ID: 15910133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Interactions between encoding and retrieval in the domain of sequence-learning. Perlman A; Tzelgov J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):118-30. PubMed ID: 16478345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Associative priming in faces: semantic relatedness or simple co-occurrence? Vladeanu M; Lewis M; Ellis H Mem Cognit; 2006 Jul; 34(5):1091-101. PubMed ID: 17128607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transfer-appropriate processing in the testing effect. Veltre MT; Cho KW; Neely JH Memory; 2015; 23(8):1229-37. PubMed ID: 25345914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Weldon MS; Roediger HL; Challis BH Mem Cognit; 1989 Jan; 17(1):95-105. PubMed ID: 2913461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gist in time: Scene semantics and structure enhance recall of searched objects. Josephs EL; Draschkow D; Wolfe JM; Võ ML Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Sep; 169():100-108. PubMed ID: 27270227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Factors modulating the effect of divided attention during retrieval of words. Fernandes MA; Moscovitch M Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):731-44. PubMed ID: 12219890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Automatic and directed search processes in solving simple semantic-memory problems. Ben-Zur H Mem Cognit; 1989 Sep; 17(5):617-26. PubMed ID: 2796746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The role of syllabic and orthographic properties of letter cues in solving word fragments. Srinivas K; Roediger HL; Rajaram S Mem Cognit; 1992 May; 20(3):219-30. PubMed ID: 1508048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. In search of cross-talk facilitation in a dual-cued recall task. Rickard TC; Bajic D J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 Jul; 31(4):750-67. PubMed ID: 16060778 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Facilitation of memory performance through induced semantic processing in survivors of severe closed-head injury. Goldstein FC; Levin HS; Boake C; Lohrey JH J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1990 Mar; 12(2):286-300. PubMed ID: 2341558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]