These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18278596)

  • 41. Effects of vehicle impact velocity and front-end structure on dynamic responses of child pedestrians.
    Liu X; Yang J
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2003 Dec; 4(4):337-44. PubMed ID: 14630582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Study of the possible relationships between tramway front-end geometry and pedestrian injury risk.
    Chevalier MC; Brizard D; Beillas P
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(1):107-113. PubMed ID: 30735446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Reconstruction of Vehicle-pedestrian Collision Road Traffic Accidents Based on PC-Crash Software.
    Duan TL; He YW; Li Z; Yang F; Li L; Qu YQ
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 35(4):440-443. PubMed ID: 31532154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Risks of Serious Injuries and Fatalities of Cyclists Associated with Impact Velocities of Cars in Car-Cyclist Accidents in Japan.
    Matsui Y; Oikawa S
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2015 Nov; 59():385-400. PubMed ID: 26660752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The effect of precrash velocity reduction on occupant response using a human body finite element model.
    Guleyupoglu B; Schap J; Kusano KD; Gayzik FS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2017 Jul; 18(5):508-514. PubMed ID: 28102701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Estimated benefit of automated emergency braking systems for vehicle-pedestrian crashes in the United States.
    Haus SH; Sherony R; Gabler HC
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S171-S176. PubMed ID: 31381447
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Assessment of pelvis and upper leg injury risk in car-pedestrian collisions: comparison of accident statistics, impactor tests and a human body finite element model.
    Snedeker JG; Muser MH; Walz FH
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2003 Oct; 47():437-57. PubMed ID: 17096259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Evaluation of injury thresholds for predicting severe head injuries in vulnerable road users resulting from ground impact via detailed accident reconstructions.
    Shi L; Han Y; Huang H; Davidsson J; Thomson R
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2020 Oct; 19(5):1845-1863. PubMed ID: 32133546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact.
    Crocetta G; Piantini S; Pierini M; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun; 79():56-69. PubMed ID: 25813760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A methodology for the geometric standardization of vehicle hoods to compare real-world pedestrian crashes.
    Koetje BD; Grabowski JG
    Ann Adv Automot Med; 2008 Oct; 52():193-8. PubMed ID: 19026236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The correlation between pedestrian injury severity in real-life crashes and Euro NCAP pedestrian test results.
    Strandroth J; Rizzi M; Sternlund S; Lie A; Tingvall C
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):604-13. PubMed ID: 22133337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Can new passenger cars reduce pedestrian lower extremity injury? A review of geometrical changes of front-end design before and after regulatory efforts.
    Nie B; Zhou Q
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):712-9. PubMed ID: 26890318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Analysis of rider and child pillion passenger kinematics along with injury mechanisms during motorcycle crash.
    Carmai J; Koetniyom S; Hossain W
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S13-S20. PubMed ID: 31381429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Characteristics of pedestrian head injuries observed from real world collision data.
    Li G; Wang F; Otte D; Simms C
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Aug; 129():362-366. PubMed ID: 31130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Head kinematics and shoulder biomechanics in shoulder impacts similar to pedestrian crashes--a THUMS study.
    Paas R; Davidsson J; Brolin K
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(5):498-506. PubMed ID: 25287938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Simulating Automated Emergency Braking with and without Torricelli Vacuum Emergency Braking for cyclists: Effect of brake deceleration and sensor field-of-view on accidents, injuries and fatalities.
    Jeppsson H; Lubbe N
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Jul; 142():105538. PubMed ID: 32470821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Investigation of traffic accidents involving seated pedestrians using a finite element simulation-based approach.
    Grindle D; Balubaid A; Untaroiu C
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2023 Mar; 26(4):484-497. PubMed ID: 35507427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Dependence of the head injury criterion and maximum acceleration on headform mass and initial velocity in tests simulating pedestrian impacts with vehicles.
    Hutchinson TP
    J Biomech Eng; 2013 Nov; 135(11):114508. PubMed ID: 24008426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Pedestrian injury mitigation by autonomous braking.
    Rosén E; Källhammer JE; Eriksson D; Nentwich M; Fredriksson R; Smith K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2010 Nov; 42(6):1949-57. PubMed ID: 20728647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The Influence of Neck Muscle Tonus and Posture on Brain Tissue Strain in Pedestrian Head Impacts.
    Alvarez VS; Halldin P; Kleiven S
    Stapp Car Crash J; 2014 Nov; 58():63-101. PubMed ID: 26192950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.