These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18278732)

  • 1. [Comparison of analog and digital fluoroscopy devices regarding patient radiation exposure in enteroclysis].
    Maataoui A; Reusch E; Khan MF; Gurung J; Thalhammer A; Ackermann H; Mulert-Ernst R; Vogl TJ; Jacobi V
    Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 18278732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enteroclysis and small bowel series: comparison of radiation dose and examination time.
    Thoeni RF; Gould RG
    Radiology; 1991 Mar; 178(3):659-62. PubMed ID: 1994398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gastrointestinal imaging: a systems analysis comparing digital and conventional techniques.
    Chawla S; Levine MS; Laufer I; Gingold EL; Kelly TJ; Langlotz CP
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1279-84. PubMed ID: 10227502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part I: Expenditures and radiation exposure.
    Ott DJ; Chen YM; Gelfand DW; Van Swearingen F; Munitz HA
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):29-31. PubMed ID: 3975413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiation exposure during nasojejunal intubation for MRI enteroclysis.
    Puustinen L; Numminen K; Uusi-Simola J; Sipponen T
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2012 Jun; 47(6):658-61. PubMed ID: 22458759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient radiation doses from enteroclysis examinations.
    Hart D; Haggett PJ; Boardman P; Nolan DJ; Wall BF
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Oct; 67(802):997-1000. PubMed ID: 8000845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Crohn disease of the small bowel: MR enteroclysis versus conventional enteroclysis.
    Masselli G; Vecchioli A; Gualdi GF
    Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(4):400-9. PubMed ID: 16447084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Comparison of conventional full spine radiographs and fluoroscopic scanning method in young patients with idiopathic scoliosis].
    Schaefer J; Kluba T; Niemeyer T; Hahnfeldt T; Vonthein R; Kottke R; Kamm KF; Claussen C
    Rofo; 2005 Aug; 177(8):1110-5. PubMed ID: 16021543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Reduction of radiation dose in pediatric patients using pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Hernandez RJ; Goodsitt MM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1247-53. PubMed ID: 8911190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dose reduction in gastrointestinal and genitourinary fluoroscopy: use of grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Boland GW; Murphy B; Arellano R; Niklason L; Mueller PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2000 Nov; 175(5):1453-7. PubMed ID: 11044062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detailed per-oral small bowel examination vs. enteroclysis. Part II: Radiographic accuracy.
    Ott DJ; Chen YM; Gelfand DW; Van Swearingen F; Munitz HA
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 3975414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Paediatric pelvic imaging: optimisation of dose and technique using digital grid-controlled pulsed fluoroscopy.
    Waugh R; McCallum HM; McCarty M; Montgomery R; Aszkenasy M
    Pediatr Radiol; 2001 May; 31(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 11373929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Technical note: potentially higher patient radiation doses using digital equipment for barium studies.
    Hart D; Wall BF
    Br J Radiol; 1995 Oct; 68(814):1112-5. PubMed ID: 7496715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Prospective randomized comparison of radiation exposure from full spine radiographs obtained in three different techniques.
    Kluba T; Schäfer J; Hahnfeldt T; Niemeyer T
    Eur Spine J; 2006 Jun; 15(6):752-6. PubMed ID: 16758107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiation doses to patients from enteroclysis.
    Tsalafoutas IA; Chrysovergis DA; Maniatis PN; Vassilaki AE; Triantopoulou ChC; Yakoumakis EN; Koulentianos ED
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 15657109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radiation doses to patients undergoing enteroclysis.
    Sulieman A; Vlychou M; Tsougos I; Kappas C; Theodorou K
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Sep; 147(1-2):122-5. PubMed ID: 21743077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of a contrast medium suitable for conventional enteroclysis, MR enteroclysis, and virtual MR enteroscopy.
    Papanikolaou N; Prassopoulos P; Grammatikakis J; Maris T; Kouroumalis E; Gourtsoyiannis N
    Abdom Imaging; 2002; 27(5):517-22. PubMed ID: 12172989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Radiation exposure during digital hysterosalpingography: how much is due to fluoroscopy?].
    Merkle E; Vogel J; Aschoff AJ
    Rofo; 1995 Sep; 163(3):256-8. PubMed ID: 7548874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intussusception reduction: Effect of air vs. liquid enema on radiation dose.
    Kaplan SL; Magill D; Felice MA; Edgar JC; Anupindi SA; Zhu X
    Pediatr Radiol; 2017 Oct; 47(11):1471-1476. PubMed ID: 28578475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reduction of fluoroscopic exposure for the air-contrast barium enema.
    Bednarek DR; Rudin S; Wong R; Andres ML
    Br J Radiol; 1983 Nov; 56(671):823-8. PubMed ID: 6626872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.