These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
265 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1827894)
1. [Validation of Oscillomat, a device for self-measurement of blood pressure. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometers]. Asmar R; Sassano P; Demolis P; Ménard J; Safar M Presse Med; 1991 Mar; 20(12):551-5. PubMed ID: 1827894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children. Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Replacing the mercury manometer with an oscillometric device in a hypertension clinic: implications for clinical decision making. Stergiou GS; Lourida P; Tzamouranis D J Hum Hypertens; 2011 Nov; 25(11):692-8. PubMed ID: 21107434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Oscillometric wrist devices: comparison with the standard mercury sphygmomanometer and estimate of the "supine" error]. Caridi G; Zoccali C; Enia G G Ital Nefrol; 2003; 20(6):589-91. PubMed ID: 14732910 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) upper-arm blood pressure measuring device according to the International Protocol in adults and obese adults. Altunkan S; Ilman N; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E Blood Press Monit; 2007 Aug; 12(4):219-25. PubMed ID: 17625394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Similarity between blood pressure values assessed by auscultatory method with mercury sphygmomanometer and automated oscillometric digital device. Pavan MV; Saura GE; Korkes HA; Nascimento KM; Madeira Neto ND; Dávila R; Rodrigues CI; Almeida FA J Bras Nefrol; 2012 Mar; 34(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 22441181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Assessing the validity of oscillometric device for blood pressure measurement in a large population-based epidemiologic study. Chen Z; Wang X; Wang Z; Zhang L; Hao G; Dong Y; Zhu M; Gao R; J Am Soc Hypertens; 2017 Nov; 11(11):730-736.e4. PubMed ID: 29032943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of Dinamap PRO-100 and mercury sphygmomanometer blood pressure measurements in a population-based study. Ni H; Wu C; Prineas R; Shea S; Liu K; Kronmal R; Bild D Am J Hypertens; 2006 Apr; 19(4):353-60. PubMed ID: 16580569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes? Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor. Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Calibration of blood pressure data after replacement of the standard mercury sphygmomanometer by an oscillometric device and concurrent change of cuffs. Neuhauser HK; Ellert U; Thamm M; Adler C Blood Press Monit; 2015 Feb; 20(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 25144600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the Samsung SBM-100A and Microlife BP 3BU1-5 wrist blood pressure measuring devices in adults according to the International Protocol. Altunkan S; Ilman N; Altunkan E Blood Press Monit; 2007 Apr; 12(2):119-25. PubMed ID: 17353656 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of two sphygmomanometers that may replace the traditional mercury column in the healthcare workplace. Elliott WJ; Young PE; DeVivo L; Feldstein J; Black HR Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):23-8. PubMed ID: 17303984 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings. Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical validation of an automatic device measuring blood pressure in the fingers. Arosio E; Zannoni M Panminerva Med; 1999 Jun; 41(2):143-8. PubMed ID: 10479914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of three automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol: The Omron M3 Intellisense (HEM-7051-E), the Omron M2 Compact (HEM 7102-E), and the Omron R3-I Plus (HEM 6022-E). Asmar R; Khabouth J; Topouchian J; El Feghali R; Mattar J Blood Press Monit; 2010 Feb; 15(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 20032779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validation of the Braun BP 3550 wrist blood pressure measuring device with a position sensor and an EasyClick cuff according to the International Protocol in adults. Ilman N; Altunkan S; Kayatürk N; Altunkan E Blood Press Monit; 2007 Feb; 12(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 17303987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of two automatic devices for self-measurement of blood pressure according to the International Protocol of the European Society of Hypertension: the Omron M6 (HEM-7001-E) and the Omron R7 (HEM 637-IT). Topouchian JA; El Assaad MA; Orobinskaia LV; El Feghali RN; Asmar RG Blood Press Monit; 2006 Jun; 11(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 16702826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension. Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]