200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279120)
1. The gray zone: scientific misconduct comes in many shades.
Handelsman J
DNA Cell Biol; 2008 Feb; 27(2):63-4. PubMed ID: 18279120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Ethics in publication.
Wallace MB; Siersema PD
Endoscopy; 2015 Jul; 47(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 26099116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Ethical considerations in the publication of scientific articles].
Avanzas P; Bayes-Genis A; Pérez de Isla L; Sanchis J; Heras M
Rev Esp Cardiol; 2011 May; 64(5):427-9. PubMed ID: 21474230
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Misconduct by researchers and authors.
Marcovitch H
Gac Sanit; 2007; 21(6):492-9. PubMed ID: 18001665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ethical dilemmas in journal publication.
Babalola O; Grant-Kels JM; Parish LC
Clin Dermatol; 2012; 30(2):231-6. PubMed ID: 22330669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Publication ethics and scientific misconduct: the role of authors.
Luther F
J Orthod; 2008 Mar; 35(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 18287388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Committee on Publication Ethics flow charts on suspected publication misconduct.
Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)
Maturitas; 2009 Mar; 62(3):208-24. PubMed ID: 19329007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Misconduct in science: does family medicine have a problem?
Berg AO
Fam Med; 1990; 22(2):137-42. PubMed ID: 2182360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Publication ethics, national and international regulations].
Nielsen OH; Riis P
Ugeskr Laeger; 2003 Apr; 165(16):1646-8. PubMed ID: 12756818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Etiquette in scientific publishing.
Krishnan V
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Oct; 144(4):577-82. PubMed ID: 24075666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Misconduct as the main cause for retraction. A descriptive study of retracted publications and their authors.
Campos-Varela I; Ruano-Raviña A
Gac Sanit; 2019; 33(4):356-360. PubMed ID: 29776690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Duplicate publication Part 1. Consideration of the issues.
Davidhizar R; Newman Giger J
Nurse Author Ed; 2002; 12(3):1-4. PubMed ID: 12092429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [A few words concerning the editorial note about the confirmation of plagiarism with regard to eight published articles by Dr. Andrzej Jendryczko].
Wroński M
Wiad Lek; 1998; 51(5-6):306-9. PubMed ID: 9867694
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Misconduct and fraud in science].
Draml W
Wien Klin Wochenschr; 1999 Dec; 111(24):1007-8. PubMed ID: 10677886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Ethical misconduct in publishing: the editors' perspective.
Sarr MG; Warshaw AL
World J Surg; 2006 Aug; 30(8):1374-6. PubMed ID: 16773251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Publication of a review article in "Ginekologia Polska" identified as a plagiarism from the "British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology].
Poreba R
Ginekol Pol; 1998 Jul; 69(7):561. PubMed ID: 9867475
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice.
Committee on Public Ethics.
J Postgrad Med; 2000; 46(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 11298477
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Publication ethics are ignored: the integrity of science is in danger].
Maisonneuve H
Arch Pediatr; 2012 Aug; 19(8):879-81. PubMed ID: 22749488
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Ethical issues faced by nursing editors.
Freda MC; Kearney MH
West J Nurs Res; 2005 Jun; 27(4):487-99. PubMed ID: 15870245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Publication ethics and the ghost management of medical publication.
Sismondo S; Doucet M
Bioethics; 2010 Jul; 24(6):273-83. PubMed ID: 19222451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
