BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

826 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279150)

  • 1. Frequency of and trends in fragrance allergy over a 15-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Ottoy W; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):134-41. PubMed ID: 18279150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Recommendation to include fragrance mix 2 and hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral) in the European baseline patch test series.
    Bruze M; Andersen KE; Goossens A; ;
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Mar; 58(3):129-33. PubMed ID: 18279149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trends of contact allergy to fragrance mix I and Myroxylon pereirae among Danish eczema patients tested between 1985 and 2007.
    Thyssen JP; Carlsen BC; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2008 Oct; 59(4):238-44. PubMed ID: 18844700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Results of patch testing with fragrance mix 1, fragrance mix 2, and their ingredients, and Myroxylon pereirae and colophonium, over a 21-year period.
    Nardelli A; Carbonez A; Drieghe J; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2013 May; 68(5):307-13. PubMed ID: 23601065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fragrance contact allergy: a 4-year retrospective study.
    Cuesta L; Silvestre JF; Toledo F; Lucas A; Pérez-Crespo M; Ballester I
    Contact Dermatitis; 2010 Aug; 63(2):77-84. PubMed ID: 20573166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Contact allergy to fragrances].
    Kieć-Swierczyńska M; Krecisz B; Swierczyńska-Machura D
    Med Pr; 2006; 57(5):431-7. PubMed ID: 17340985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Allergic contact dermatitis from fragrance components in specific topical pharmaceutical products in Belgium.
    Nardelli A; D'Hooghe E; Drieghe J; Dooms M; Goossens A
    Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Jun; 60(6):303-13. PubMed ID: 19489964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact allergy to the 26 specific fragrance ingredients to be declared on cosmetic products in accordance with the EU cosmetics directive.
    Heisterberg MV; Menné T; Johansen JD
    Contact Dermatitis; 2011 Nov; 65(5):266-75. PubMed ID: 21943251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contact allergy to farnesol in 2021 consecutively patch tested patients. Results of the IVDK.
    Schnuch A; Uter W; Geier J; Lessmann H; Frosch PJ
    Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Mar; 50(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 15153123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Fragrance contact dermatitis: a worldwide multicenter investigation (Part I).
    Larsen W; Nakayama H; Lindberg M; Fischer T; Elsner P; Burrows D; Jordan W; Shaw S; Wilkinson J; Marks J; Sugawara M; Nethercott J
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 8796746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A clinical and patch test study of patients with positive patch test reactions to fragrance mix in China.
    Lu X; Li LF; Wang W; Wang J
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Apr; 52(4):188-91. PubMed ID: 15859990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Allergic contact dermatitis to fragrance: a review.
    Scheinman PL
    Am J Contact Dermat; 1996 Jun; 7(2):65-76. PubMed ID: 8796745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selected oxidized fragrance terpenes are common contact allergens.
    Matura M; Sköld M; Börje A; Andersen KE; Bruze M; Frosch P; Goossens A; Johansen JD; Svedman C; White IR; Karlberg AT
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Jun; 52(6):320-8. PubMed ID: 15932583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A link between skin and airways regarding sensitivity to fragrance products?
    Elberling J; Linneberg A; Mosbech H; Dirksen A; Frølund L; Madsen F; Nielsen NH; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2004 Dec; 151(6):1197-203. PubMed ID: 15606515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde (Lyral®) as allergen: experience from a contact dermatitis unit.
    Carvalho R; Maio P; Amaro C; Santos R; Cardoso J
    Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Sep; 30(3):249-50. PubMed ID: 21345163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fragrance contact dermatitis in Korea: a joint study.
    An S; Lee AY; Lee CH; Kim DW; Hahm JH; Kim KJ; Moon KC; Won YH; Ro YS; Eun HC
    Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Dec; 53(6):320-3. PubMed ID: 16364118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency of allergic contact dermatitis to isoeugenol is increasing: a review of 3636 patients tested from 2001 to 2005.
    White JM; White IR; Glendinning A; Fleming J; Jefferies D; Basketter DA; McFadden JP; Buckley DA
    Br J Dermatol; 2007 Sep; 157(3):580-2. PubMed ID: 17573874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Epidemiology of contact dermatitis: prevalence of sensitization to different allergens and associated factors].
    Bordel-Gómez MT; Miranda-Romero A; Castrodeza-Sanz J
    Actas Dermosifiliogr; 2010; 101(1):59-75. PubMed ID: 20109394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Baseline series fragrance markers fail to predict contact allergy.
    Mann J; McFadden JP; White JM; White IR; Banerjee P
    Contact Dermatitis; 2014 May; 70(5):276-81. PubMed ID: 24731084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydroxyisohexyl 3-cyclohexene carboxaldehyde allergy: relationship between patch test and repeated open application test thresholds.
    Fischer LA; Menné T; Avnstorp C; Kasting GB; Johansen JD
    Br J Dermatol; 2009 Sep; 161(3):560-7. PubMed ID: 19486000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 42.