BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279255)

  • 1. Evaluation of the NITV CVSA.
    Hollien H; Harnsberger JD; Martin CA; Hollien KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jan; 53(1):183-93. PubMed ID: 18279255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stress and deception in speech: evaluating layered voice analysis.
    Harnsberger JD; Hollien H; Martin CA; Hollien KA
    J Forensic Sci; 2009 May; 54(3):642-50. PubMed ID: 19432740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detecting deception: the promise and the reality of voice stress analysis.
    Horvath F
    J Forensic Sci; 1982 Apr; 27(2):340-51. PubMed ID: 7047675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Voice stress evaluators and lie detection.
    Hollien H; Geison L; Hicks JW
    J Forensic Sci; 1987 Mar; 32(2):405-18. PubMed ID: 3553418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of psychological stress as an investigative tool.
    Chapman JL
    Leg Med; 1980; ():57-74. PubMed ID: 7421395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A description and analysis of the operation and validity of the psychological stress evaluator.
    VanDercar DH; Greaner J; Hibler NS; Spielberger CD; Bloch S
    J Forensic Sci; 1980 Jan; 25(1):174-88. PubMed ID: 7391775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An experimental comparison of the psychological stress evaluator and the galvanic skin response in detection of deception.
    Horvath F
    J Appl Psychol; 1978 Jun; 63(3):338-44. PubMed ID: 690061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of forensic statement analysis in distinguishing truthful from deceptive eyewitness accounts of highly stressful events.
    Morgan CA; Colwell K; Hazlett GA
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Sep; 56(5):1227-34. PubMed ID: 21854383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Speaking of secrets and lies: the contribution of ventrolateral prefrontal cortex to vocal deception.
    Spence SA; Kaylor-Hughes C; Farrow TF; Wilkinson ID
    Neuroimage; 2008 Apr; 40(3):1411-8. PubMed ID: 18308586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The accuracy of auditors' and layered voice Analysis (LVA) operators' judgments of truth and deception during police questioning.
    Horvath F; McCloughan J; Weatherman D; Slowik S
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Mar; 58(2):385-92. PubMed ID: 23406506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychophysiological and vocal measures in the detection of guilty knowledge.
    Gamer M; Rill HG; Vossel G; Gödert HW
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Apr; 60(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 16005091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assigned versus random, countermeasure-like responses in the p300 based complex trial protocol for detection of deception: task demand effects.
    Meixner JB; Haynes A; Winograd MR; Brown J; Peter Rosenfeld J
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Sep; 34(3):209-20. PubMed ID: 19543970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of two methods of voice activity detection in field studies.
    Lindstrom F; Ren K; Li H; Waye KP
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Dec; 52(6):1658-63. PubMed ID: 19951931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A complex experimental assessment for objective description of hierarchical psychophysiological behavior as human regulatory phenotype.
    Johannes B; Eichhorn C; Fischer F
    J Gravit Physiol; 1994 May; 1(1):P73-4. PubMed ID: 11538770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Voice disguise and automatic speaker recognition.
    Zhang C; Tan T
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Mar; 175(2-3):118-22. PubMed ID: 17646071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Exercise Tolerance Test: a comparison between true positive and false positive test results.
    Faisal AW; Abid AR; Azhar M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2007; 19(4):71-4. PubMed ID: 18693603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The reliability of lie detection performance.
    Leach AM; Lindsay RC; Koehler R; Beaudry JL; Bala NC; Lee K; Talwar V
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Feb; 33(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 18594955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of two types of control questions and two question formats on the outcomes of polygraph examinations.
    Horvath F; Palmatier JJ
    J Forensic Sci; 2008 Jul; 53(4):889-99. PubMed ID: 18554232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study of the standardised extract shr-5 of the roots of Rhodiola rosea in the treatment of subjects with stress-related fatigue.
    Olsson EM; von Schéele B; Panossian AG
    Planta Med; 2009 Feb; 75(2):105-12. PubMed ID: 19016404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Voice stress monitoring in space--possibilities and limits.
    Johannes B; Salnitski VP; Gunga HC; Kirsch K
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2000 Sep; 71(9 Suppl):A58-65. PubMed ID: 10993311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.