1273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279292)
1. Comparison of homecare costs of local wound care in surgical patients randomized between occlusive and gauze dressings.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; van Hattem J
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):593-601. PubMed ID: 18279292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Occlusive vs gauze dressings for local wound care in surgical patients: a randomized clinical trial.
Ubbink DT; Vermeulen H; Goossens A; Kelner RB; Schreuder SM; Lubbers MJ
Arch Surg; 2008 Oct; 143(10):950-5. PubMed ID: 18936373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A prospective, randomized clinical trial to assess the cost-effectiveness of a modern foam dressing versus a traditional saline gauze dressing in the treatment of stage II pressure ulcers.
Payne WG; Posnett J; Alvarez O; Brown-Etris M; Jameson G; Wolcott R; Dharma H; Hartwell S; Ochs D
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2009 Feb; 55(2):50-5. PubMed ID: 19246785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modern wound care for the poor: a randomized clinical trial comparing the vacuum system with conventional saline-soaked gauze dressings.
Perez D; Bramkamp M; Exe C; von Ruden C; Ziegler A
Am J Surg; 2010 Jan; 199(1):14-20. PubMed ID: 19362288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of occlusive and conventional gauze dressings on incisional healing after abdominal operations.
Holm C; Petersen JS; Grønboek F; Gottrup F
Eur J Surg; 1998 Mar; 164(3):179-83. PubMed ID: 9562277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Do patient and nurse outcome differences exist between 2 negative pressure wound therapy systems?
Albert NM; Rock R; Sammon MA; Bena JF; Morrison SL; Whitman A; Kato I; Landis-Erdman JC
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2012; 39(3):259-66. PubMed ID: 22552107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Wound prevalence, types, and treatments in home care.
Pieper B; Templin TN; Dobal M; Jacox A
Adv Wound Care; 1999 Apr; 12(3):117-26. PubMed ID: 10655791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial of topical negative pressure wound closure in India.
Mody GN; Nirmal IA; Duraisamy S; Perakath B
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2008 Dec; 54(12):36-46. PubMed ID: 19104122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Randomized controlled trial of the absorbency of four dressings and their effects on the evaporation of burn wounds.
Chen J; Han CM; Su GL; Tang ZJ; Su SJ; Lin XW
Chin Med J (Engl); 2007 Oct; 120(20):1788-91. PubMed ID: 18028772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. OUTCOME OF FOAM VERSUS GAUZE DRESSINGS IN NEGATIVE PRESSURE WOUND THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC WOUNDS WITH SOFT TISSUE LOSS AT KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL.
Ondieki JG; Khainga SO; Owilla F; Nangole FW
East Afr Med J; 2012 Jul; 89(7):230-40. PubMed ID: 26845802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [New therapeutic strategies for the treatment of difficult wounds].
Onesti MG; Bitonti A; Fino P; Ciotti M; Scuderi N
G Chir; 2008 May; 29(5):212-20. PubMed ID: 18507956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hydrocolloid versus saline-gauze dressings in treating pressure ulcers: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Xakellis GC; Chrischilles EA
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1992 May; 73(5):463-9. PubMed ID: 1580775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cost and clinical effectiveness analysis among moist wound healing dressings versus traditional methods in home care patients with pressure ulcers.
Souliotis K; Kalemikerakis I; Saridi M; Papageorgiou M; Kalokerinou A
Wound Repair Regen; 2016 May; 24(3):596-601. PubMed ID: 27037729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized trial comparing subatmospheric wound therapy with a sealed gauze dressing and the standard vacuum-assisted closure device.
Dorafshar AH; Franczyk M; Gottlieb LJ; Wroblewski KE; Lohman RF
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Jul; 69(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 21712704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prevalence of wet-to-dry dressings in wound care.
Cowan LJ; Stechmiller J
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 Dec; 22(12):567-73. PubMed ID: 19935135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bacterial load in relation to vacuum-assisted closure wound therapy: a prospective randomized trial.
Mouës CM; Vos MC; van den Bemd GJ; Stijnen T; Hovius SE
Wound Repair Regen; 2004; 12(1):11-7. PubMed ID: 14974959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vacuum-assisted closure versus saline-moistened gauze in the healing of postoperative diabetic foot wounds.
McCallon SK; Knight CA; Valiulus JP; Cunningham MW; McCulloch JM; Farinas LP
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2000 Aug; 46(8):28-32, 34. PubMed ID: 11189545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of an adhesive hydrocellular foam dressing and a self-adherent soft silicone foam dressing in a nursing home setting.
Viamontes L; Temple D; Wytall D; Walker A
Ostomy Wound Manage; 2003 Aug; 49(8):48-52, 54-6, 58. PubMed ID: 14631663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Care of pressure sores: a controlled study of the use of a hydrocolloid dressing compared with wet saline gauze compresses.
Alm A; Hornmark AM; Fall PA; Linder L; Bergstrand B; Ehrnebo M; Madsen SM; Setterberg G
Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh); 1989; 149():1-10. PubMed ID: 2694713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
