166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279297)
1. Norton, Waterlow and Braden scores: a review of the literature and a comparison between the scores and clinical judgement.
Anthony D; Parboteeah S; Saleh M; Papanikolaou P
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):646-53. PubMed ID: 18279297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The impact of pressure ulcer risk assessment on patient outcomes among hospitalised patients.
Saleh M; Anthony D; Parboteeah S
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jul; 18(13):1923-9. PubMed ID: 19374691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Interrater reliability using Modified Norton Scale, Pressure Ulcer Card, Short Form-Mini Nutritional Assessment by registered and enrolled nurses in clinical practice.
Bååth C; Hall-Lord ML; Idvall E; Wiberg-Hedman K; Wilde Larsson B
J Clin Nurs; 2008 Mar; 17(5):618-26. PubMed ID: 18279294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Predicting pressure ulcer risk with the modified Braden, Braden, and Norton scales in acute care hospitals in Mainland China.
Kwong E; Pang S; Wong T; Ho J; Shao-ling X; Li-jun T
Appl Nurs Res; 2005 May; 18(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 15991112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A critique of 'at risk' pressure sore assessment tools.
Smith LN; Booth N; Douglas D; Robertson WR; Walker A; Durie M; Fraser A; Hillan EH; Swaffield J
J Clin Nurs; 1995 May; 4(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 7773524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Examining the validity of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a replication study.
Gould D; Goldstone L; Kelly D; Gammon J
Int J Nurs Stud; 2004 Mar; 41(3):331-9. PubMed ID: 14967190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An interrater reliability study of the assessment of pressure ulcer risk using the Braden scale and the classification of pressure ulcers in a home care setting.
Kottner J; Halfens R; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2009 Oct; 46(10):1307-12. PubMed ID: 19406400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessing predictive validity of the modified Braden scale for prediction of pressure ulcer risk of orthopaedic patients in an acute care setting.
Chan WS; Pang SM; Kwong EW
J Clin Nurs; 2009 Jun; 18(11):1565-73. PubMed ID: 19490294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pressure injury risk assessment in intensive care: comparison of inter-rater reliability of the COMHON (Conscious level, Mobility, Haemodynamics, Oxygenation, Nutrition) Index with three scales.
Fulbrook P; Anderson A
J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar; 72(3):680-92. PubMed ID: 26462998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of pressure ulcer risk assessment scales: a critique.
Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
J Adv Nurs; 2004 Dec; 48(6):613-21. PubMed ID: 15548252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Lopez-Medina IM; Alvarez-Nieto C
J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 16553695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effectiveness of self-assessment on the identification of learner needs, learner activity, and impact on clinical practice: BEME Guide no. 10.
Colthart I; Bagnall G; Evans A; Allbutt H; Haig A; Illing J; McKinstry B
Med Teach; 2008; 30(2):124-45. PubMed ID: 18464136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of three commonly used pressure ulcer risk assessment scales.
O'Tuathail C; Taqi R
Br J Nurs; 2011 Mar 24-Apr 14; 20(6):S27-8, S30, S32 Passim. PubMed ID: 21471902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An interrater reliability study of the Braden scale in two nursing homes.
Kottner J; Dassen T
Int J Nurs Stud; 2008 Oct; 45(10):1501-11. PubMed ID: 18395726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing pressure ulcer incidence through Braden Scale risk assessment and support surface use.
Comfort EH
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2008 Jul; 21(7):330-4. PubMed ID: 18600075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-rater reliability of the EPUAP pressure ulcer classification system using photographs.
Defloor T; Schoonhoven L
J Clin Nurs; 2004 Nov; 13(8):952-9. PubMed ID: 15533101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluating the risks of pressure ulcers. The Braden scale].
Torra i Bou JE
Rev Enferm; 1997 Apr; 20(224):22-30. PubMed ID: 9220862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
