247 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279938)
1. Trends in Gleason score: concordance between biopsy and prostatectomy over 15 years.
Rajinikanth A; Manoharan M; Soloway CT; Civantos FJ; Soloway MS
Urology; 2008 Jul; 72(1):177-82. PubMed ID: 18279938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Concordance between Gleason scores of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens: a population-based study.
Kvåle R; Møller B; Wahlqvist R; Fosså SD; Berner A; Busch C; Kyrdalen AE; Svindland A; Viset T; Halvorsen OJ
BJU Int; 2009 Jun; 103(12):1647-54. PubMed ID: 19154461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prostate cancer grading: the effect of stratification of needle biopsy Gleason Score 4 + 3 as high or intermediate grade.
Fanning DM; Kay E; Fan Y; Fitzpatrick JM; Watson RW
BJU Int; 2010 Mar; 105(5):631-5. PubMed ID: 19732053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Increasing the number of biopsies increases the concordance of Gleason scores of needle biopsies and prostatectomy specimens.
Divrik RT; Eroglu A; Sahin A; Zorlu F; Ozen H
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):376-82. PubMed ID: 17826653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Discrepancies in Gleason scoring of prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens and the effects of multiple needle biopsies on scoring accuracy. A regional experience in Tamworth, Australia.
Ooi K; Samali R
ANZ J Surg; 2007 May; 77(5):336-8. PubMed ID: 17497970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient risk stratification using Gleason score concordance and upgrading among men with prostate biopsy Gleason score 6 or 7.
Serkin FB; Soderdahl DW; Cullen J; Chen Y; Hernandez J
Urol Oncol; 2010; 28(3):302-7. PubMed ID: 19117774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improved accuracy for predicting the Gleason score of prostate cancer by increasing the number of transrectal biopsy cores.
Miyake H; Kurahashi T; Takenaka A; Hara I; Fujisawa M
Urol Int; 2007; 79(4):302-6. PubMed ID: 18025846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Increasing the number of biopsy cores improves the concordance of biopsy Gleason score to prostatectomy Gleason score.
Coogan CL; Latchamsetty KC; Greenfield J; Corman JM; Lynch B; Porter CR
BJU Int; 2005 Aug; 96(3):324-7. PubMed ID: 16042723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between upgrading of prostate biopsy and biochemical failure and unfavorable pathology after radical prostatectomy.
Ozden C; Oztekin CV; Ugurlu O; Gokkaya S; Yaris M; Memis A
Urol Int; 2009; 83(2):146-50. PubMed ID: 19752607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Usefulness of the 2005 International Society of Urologic Pathology Gleason grading system in prostate biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens.
Uemura H; Hoshino K; Sasaki T; Miyoshi Y; Ishiguro H; Inayama Y; Kubota Y
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(9):1190-4. PubMed ID: 19076142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Limitations of biopsy Gleason grade: implications for counseling patients with biopsy Gleason score 6 prostate cancer.
Sved PD; Gomez P; Manoharan M; Kim SS; Soloway MS
J Urol; 2004 Jul; 172(1):98-102. PubMed ID: 15201746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extended 12-core prostate biopsy increases both the detection of prostate cancer and the accuracy of Gleason score.
Elabbady AA; Khedr MM
Eur Urol; 2006 Jan; 49(1):49-53; discussion 53. PubMed ID: 16314035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostatectomy and biopsies that show more than two different Gleason scores in positive cores.
Park HK; Choe G; Byun SS; Lee HW; Lee SE; Lee E
Urology; 2006 Jan; 67(1):110-4. PubMed ID: 16413344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A contemporary study correlating prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy Gleason score.
Fine SW; Epstein JI
J Urol; 2008 Apr; 179(4):1335-8; discussion 1338-9. PubMed ID: 18289601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prostate biopsy clinical and pathological variables that predict significant grading changes in patients with intermediate and high grade prostate cancer.
Moussa AS; Li J; Soriano M; Klein EA; Dong F; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2009 Jan; 103(1):43-8. PubMed ID: 18782303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Discrepancy between Gleason score of needle biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens--current situation of general pathologists].
Kato T; Nakano M; Uno H; Seike K; Kojima K; Kubota Y; Goto T; Yamamoto N; Ehara H; Kanimoto Y; Takahashi Y; Deguchi T
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2008 Oct; 54(10):641-5. PubMed ID: 19048927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Impact of Gleason pattern up gradation after radical prostatectomy for carcinoma prostate patients with low biopsy score (≤ 6).
Kulkarni JN; Valsangkar RS; Jadhav YR; Singh DP
J Cancer Res Ther; 2011; 7(4):459-62. PubMed ID: 22269410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Does prostate biopsy Gleason score accurately express the biologic features of prostate cancer?
Stav K; Judith S; Merald H; Leibovici D; Lindner A; Zisman A
Urol Oncol; 2007; 25(5):383-6. PubMed ID: 17826654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Concordance of the Gleason score in prostate multibiopsy and definitive histology].
May M; Brookman-May S; Lebentrau S; Gilfrich C; Loy V; Theissig F; Roigas J; Hoschke B; Burger M; Miller K
Aktuelle Urol; 2010 May; 41(3):184-92. PubMed ID: 20309804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Correlation between Gleason score of needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimen: accuracy and clinical implications.
Cookson MS; Fleshner NE; Soloway SM; Fair WR
J Urol; 1997 Feb; 157(2):559-62. PubMed ID: 8996356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
