611 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279944)
1. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Kho RM; Weaver AL; Montero RP; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Apr; 109(1):86-91. PubMed ID: 18279944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A case matched analysis of robotic radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy compared with laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Estape R; Lambrou N; Diaz R; Estape E; Dunkin N; Rivera A
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Jun; 113(3):357-61. PubMed ID: 19345987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques.
Bell MC; Torgerson J; Seshadri-Kreaden U; Suttle AW; Hunt S
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):407-11. PubMed ID: 18829091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy using pulsed bipolar system: comparison with conventional bipolar electrosurgery.
Lee CL; Huang KG; Wang CJ; Lee PS; Hwang LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Jun; 105(3):620-4. PubMed ID: 17303226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of laparascopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Steed H; Rosen B; Murphy J; Laframboise S; De Petrillo D; Covens A
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Jun; 93(3):588-93. PubMed ID: 15196849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Robotic radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy for cervical carcinoma: a pilot study.
Kim YT; Kim SW; Hyung WJ; Lee SJ; Nam EJ; Lee WJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 18035405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical carcinoma patients, comparing results with total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy cases. The future is now?
Sert B; Abeler V
Int J Med Robot; 2007 Sep; 3(3):224-8. PubMed ID: 17924449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sentinel lymph node identification and radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy in early stage cervical cancer: laparoscopy versus laparotomy.
Díaz-Feijoo B; Gil-Moreno A; Pérez-Benavente MA; Morchón S; Martínez-Palones JM; Xercavins J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):531-7. PubMed ID: 18657483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A comparison of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy and laparotomy in the treatment of Ib-IIa cervical cancer.
Li G; Yan X; Shang H; Wang G; Chen L; Han Y
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Apr; 105(1):176-80. PubMed ID: 17197013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic radical hysterectomy: Technical aspects.
Magrina JF; Kho R; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):28-31. PubMed ID: 19176237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: Retrospective and comparative study with laparotomy and laparoscopy].
Farache C; Alonso S; Ferrer Marsollier C; Masia F; de Tayrac R; Triopon G
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Jun; 41(4):353-62. PubMed ID: 22542372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Robotic radical hysterectomy in the management of gynecologic malignancies.
Pareja R; Ramirez PT
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(6):673-6. PubMed ID: 18774759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with Ib1 stage cervical cancer: analysis of surgical and oncological outcome.
Pellegrino A; Vizza E; Fruscio R; Villa A; Corrado G; Villa M; Dell'Anna T; Vitobello D
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2009 Jan; 35(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 18760562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (VRARH) after laparoscopic staging: feasibility and operative results.
Oleszczuk A; Köhler C; Paulick J; Schneider A; Lanowska M
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Mar; 5(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19153971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study.
Jackson KS; Das N; Naik R; Lopes AD; Godfrey KA; Hatem MH; Monaghan JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2004 Dec; 95(3):655-61. PubMed ID: 15581978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The outcome of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for cervical cancer: a prospective analysis of 295 patients.
Chen Y; Xu H; Li Y; Wang D; Li J; Yuan J; Liang Z
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2847-55. PubMed ID: 18649105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
