613 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18279944)
21. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy in stages I and II endometrial cancer. Operating data, follow up and survival.
Zapico A; Fuentes P; Grassa A; Arnanz F; Otazua J; Cortés-Prieto J
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Aug; 98(2):222-7. PubMed ID: 15982724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopy compared with laparotomy for the surgical staging of endometrial carcinoma.
Wong CK; Wong YH; Lo LS; Tai CM; Ng TK
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2005 Aug; 31(4):286-90. PubMed ID: 16018773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer.
DeNardis SA; Holloway RW; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Ahmad S; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):412-7. PubMed ID: 18834620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Robotic versus open radical hysterectomy: a comparative study at a single institution.
Ko EM; Muto MG; Berkowitz RS; Feltmate CM
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Dec; 111(3):425-30. PubMed ID: 18929400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Turkey's experience of robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy: a series of 25 consecutive cases.
Göçmen A; Sanlikan F; Uçar MG
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2010 Aug; 282(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 19838722
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of total laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer.
Frumovitz M; dos Reis R; Sun CC; Milam MR; Bevers MW; Brown J; Slomovitz BM; Ramirez PT
Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Jul; 110(1):96-102. PubMed ID: 17601902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparative study of 3 surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy.
Boggess JF; Gehrig PA; Cantrell L; Shafer A; Ridgway M; Skinner EN; Fowler WC
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Oct; 199(4):360.e1-9. PubMed ID: 18928974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Robotic radical hysterectomy. A literature review.
Smith AL; Pareja R; Ramirez PT
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Aug; 61(4):339-46. PubMed ID: 19745798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Total laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for locally advanced cervical carcinoma (stages IIB, IIA and bulky stages IB) after concurrent chemoradiation therapy: surgical morbidity and oncological results.
Colombo PE; Bertrand MM; Gutowski M; Mourregot A; Fabbro M; Saint-Aubert B; Quenet F; Gourgou S; Kerr C; Rouanet P
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Sep; 114(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 19555996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Robot-assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: comparison with total laparoscopic hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy; one surgeon's experience at the Norwegian Radium Hospital.
Sert MB; Abeler V
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Jun; 121(3):600-4. PubMed ID: 21353294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Analysis of secondary cytoreduction for recurrent ovarian cancer by robotics, laparoscopy and laparotomy.
Magrina JF; Cetta RL; Chang YH; Guevara G; Magtibay PM
Gynecol Oncol; 2013 May; 129(2):336-40. PubMed ID: 23357611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: Analysis of surgical performance.
Holloway RW; Ahmad S; DeNardis SA; Peterson LB; Sultana N; Bigsby GE; Pikaart DP; Finkler NJ
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Dec; 115(3):447-52. PubMed ID: 19765807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of body mass index on robotic-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
Nawfal AK; Orady M; Eisenstein D; Wegienka G
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(3):328-32. PubMed ID: 21411379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Robotic radical hysterectomy.
Fanning J; Hojat R; Johnson J; Fenton B
Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Feb; 61(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 19204661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Pilot study assessing robotic laparoscopic hysterectomy and patient outcomes.
Fiorentino RP; Zepeda MA; Goldstein BH; John CR; Rettenmaier MA
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(1):60-3. PubMed ID: 16431325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Clinical analysis of radical hysterectomy plus pelvic lymphadenectomy for patients with malignant uterine tumors: laparoscopy versus laparotomy].
He YL; Zhang LY; Yang J; Pan SL; Peng DX
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2004 May; 39(5):308-10. PubMed ID: 15196411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer Is Associated With Reduced Morbidity and Similar Survival Outcomes Compared With Laparotomy.
Diver E; Hinchcliff E; Gockley A; Melamed A; Contrino L; Feldman S; Growdon W
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2017; 24(3):402-406. PubMed ID: 28011096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
