131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280214)
1. Reliability and accuracy of fine-cut computed tomography scans to determine the status of anterior interbody fusions with metallic cages.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Schwender JD; Subach BR; Gornet MF; Ohno S
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):998-1002. PubMed ID: 18280214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard.
Carreon LY; Djurasovic M; Glassman SD; Sailer P
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Apr; 32(8):892-5. PubMed ID: 17426635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fusion assessment of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using radiolucent cages: X-ray films and helical computed tomography scans compared with surgical exploration of fusion.
Fogel GR; Toohey JS; Neidre A; Brantigan JW
Spine J; 2008; 8(4):570-7. PubMed ID: 17544854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reliability and agreement between fine-cut CT scans and plain radiography in the evaluation of posterolateral fusions.
Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Djurasovic M
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 17197331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward the establishment of optimal computed tomographic parameters for the assessment of lumbar spinal fusion.
Ho JM; Ben-Galim PJ; Weiner BK; Karbach LE; Reitman CA; Heggeness MH; Hipp JA
Spine J; 2011 Jul; 11(7):636-40. PubMed ID: 21684814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Influence of cage geometry on sagittal alignment in instrumented posterior lumbar interbody fusion.
Gödde S; Fritsch E; Dienst M; Kohn D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1693-9. PubMed ID: 12897494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of postoperative radiographs after anterior lumbar interbody fusion with or without posterior instrumentation.
Simpson AK; Osler P; Wood KB
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Nov; 38(23):2038-42. PubMed ID: 23963014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Guideline update for the performance of fusion procedures for degenerative disease of the lumbar spine. Part 4: radiographic assessment of fusion status.
Choudhri TF; Mummaneni PV; Dhall SS; Eck JC; Groff MW; Ghogawala Z; Watters WC; Dailey AT; Resnick DK; Sharan A; Wang JC; Kaiser MG
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Jul; 21(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 24980581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiologic assessment of interbody fusion using carbon fiber cages.
Santos ER; Goss DG; Morcom RK; Fraser RD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 May; 28(10):997-1001. PubMed ID: 12768137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Posterolateral lumbar spine fusion with INFUSE bone graft.
Glassman SD; Carreon L; Djurasovic M; Campbell MJ; Puno RM; Johnson JR; Dimar JR
Spine J; 2007; 7(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 17197332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Adjacent segment degeneration after lumbosacral fusion in spondylolisthesis: a retrospective radiological and clinical analysis].
Zencica P; Chaloupka R; Hladíková J; Krbec M
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2010 Apr; 77(2):124-30. PubMed ID: 20447355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Anterior cervical fusion assessment: surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation.
Buchowski JM; Liu G; Bunmaprasert T; Rose PS; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 May; 33(11):1185-91. PubMed ID: 18469691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What is the most accurate radiographic criterion to determine anterior cervical fusion?
Riew KD; Yang JJ; Chang DG; Park SM; Yeom JS; Lee JS; Jang EC; Song KS
Spine J; 2019 Mar; 19(3):469-475. PubMed ID: 29990594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prospective clinical outcomes of revision fusion surgery in patients with pseudarthrosis after posterior lumbar interbody fusions using stand-alone metallic cages.
Cassinelli EH; Wallach C; Hanscom B; Vogt M; Kang JD
Spine J; 2006; 6(4):428-34. PubMed ID: 16825051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interobserver agreement using computed tomography to assess radiographic fusion criteria with a unique titanium interbody device.
Slosar PJ; Kaiser J; Marrero L; Sacco D
Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2015 Feb; 44(2):86-9. PubMed ID: 25658078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of dynamic views using plain radiographs and thin-section three-dimensional computed tomography in the evaluation of fusion after posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery.
Lee HS; Lee JH; Lee JH
Spine J; 2013 Oct; 13(10):1200-7. PubMed ID: 24075026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Posterior lumbar interbody fusion using recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 with cylindrical interbody cages.
Haid RW; Branch CL; Alexander JT; Burkus JK
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):527-38; discussion 538-9. PubMed ID: 15363423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver and Intraobserver Reliability in the Radiologic Assessment of Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
Kroeze RJ; Graat HCA; Pluymakers WJ; Marting LN; van Dijk M; van Dijke CF; Vd Klis AH; Verberne SJ; de Gruyter AJ; Temmerman OPP
Clin Spine Surg; 2017 Jul; 30(6):E853-E856. PubMed ID: 27548041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter- and intraobserver variability in the postoperative evaluation of transpedicular stabilization: computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging.
Tohtz SW; Rogalla P; Taupitz M; Perka C; Winkler T; Putzier M
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 20171934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of recombinant human bone morphogenic protein in posterior interbody fusions of the lumbar spine: a clinical series.
Geibel PT; Boyd DL; Slabisak V
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2009 Jul; 22(5):315-20. PubMed ID: 19525785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
