BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280425)

  • 1. Porosity of neat and composite bone cement mantles.
    Hansen CL; McQueen DA; Friis EA; Cooke FW; Widenhouse CW
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Feb; 23(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 18280425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of vacuum mixing and pre-heating the femoral component on the mechanical properties of the cement mantle.
    Baleani M; Bialoblocka-Juszczyk E; Engels GE; Viceconti M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2010 Mar; 92(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 20190321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experimental study on the cement mantle in hip arthroplasty: effect of defects on the property of the materials used.
    Fognani R; Baleani M; Toni A
    Chir Organi Mov; 2000; 85(4):403-8. PubMed ID: 11569365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. In vitro cyclic testing of the Exeter stem after cement within cement revision.
    Wilson LJ; Bell CG; Weinrauch P; Crawford R
    J Arthroplasty; 2009 Aug; 24(5):789-94. PubMed ID: 18534400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Polished vs rough femoral components in grade A and grade C-2 cement mantles.
    Duffy GP; Lozynsky AJ; Harris WH
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Oct; 21(7):1054-63. PubMed ID: 17027551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Extensive porosity at the cement-femoral prosthesis interface: a preliminary study.
    James SP; Schmalzried TP; McGarry FJ; Harris WH
    J Biomed Mater Res; 1993 Jan; 27(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 8421001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Precooling of the femoral canal enhances shear strength at the cement-prosthesis interface and reduces the polymerization temperature.
    Hsieh PH; Tai CL; Chang YH; Lee MS; Shih HN; Shih CH
    J Orthop Res; 2006 Sep; 24(9):1809-14. PubMed ID: 16865715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of cement mantles in collared versus collarless femoral components.
    Mahoney CR; Yun AG; Pellicci PM
    Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ); 2006 May; 35(5):235-6. PubMed ID: 16764183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Thermal effects of cement mantle thickness for hip resurfacing.
    Little JP; Gray HA; Murray DW; Beard DJ; Gill HS
    J Arthroplasty; 2008 Apr; 23(3):454-8. PubMed ID: 18358388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of stem geometry on stresses within the distal cement mantle in total hip replacement.
    Schmölz W; Gordon DR; Shields AJ; Kirkwood D; Grigoris P
    Technol Health Care; 2000; 8(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 10942992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Uncompromised quality of the cement mantle in Exeter femoral components implanted through a minimally-invasive direct anterior approach. A prospective, randomised cadaver study.
    Mayr E; Krismer M; Ertl M; Kessler O; Thaler M; Nogler M
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Sep; 88(9):1252-6. PubMed ID: 16943482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Acetabular cement mantles and component position: are we achieving "ideal" results?
    Sandhu HS; Martin WN; Bishay M; Pozo JL
    J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):841-5. PubMed ID: 16950036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vivo behavior of acrylic bone cement in total hip arthroplasty.
    Ries MD; Young E; Al-Marashi L; Goldstein P; Hetherington A; Petrie T; Pruitt L
    Biomaterials; 2006 Jan; 27(2):256-61. PubMed ID: 16039712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Femoral cementing techniques in total hip replacement.
    Rice J; Prenderville T; Murray P; McCormack B; Quinlan W
    Int Orthop; 1998; 22(5):308-11. PubMed ID: 9914934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of two different types of cement restrictors on the femoral cement mantle.
    Faraj AA; Rajasekar K
    Acta Orthop Belg; 2006 Dec; 72(6):702-8. PubMed ID: 17260607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cement mantle retention: filling the hole.
    Cross M; Bostrom M
    Orthopedics; 2009 Sep; 32(9):. PubMed ID: 19751012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Why would cement porosity reduction be clinically irrelevant, while experimental data show the contrary.
    Janssen D; Stolk J; Verdonschot N
    J Orthop Res; 2005 Jul; 23(4):691-7. PubMed ID: 16022978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical distribution of the fatigue strength of porous bone cement.
    Hoey DA; Taylor D
    Biomaterials; 2009 Oct; 30(31):6309-17. PubMed ID: 19699519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Four-angle radiographic assessment of cement mantle thickness in cemented total hip arthroplasty.
    Kawate K; Yajima H; Tomita Y; Sugimoto K; Ohmura T; Hiyoshi N; Takakura Y
    J Arthroplasty; 2003 Oct; 18(7):914-9. PubMed ID: 14566749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Cement mantle fatigue failure in total hip replacement: experimental and computational testing.
    Jeffers JR; Browne M; Lennon AB; Prendergast PJ; Taylor M
    J Biomech; 2007; 40(7):1525-33. PubMed ID: 17070816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.