These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

553 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280658)

  • 1. The influence of Mozart's sonata K.448 on visual attention: an ERPs study.
    Zhu W; Zhao L; Zhang J; Ding X; Liu H; Ni E; Ma Y; Zhou C
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 18280658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An investigation into the temporal dimension of the Mozart effect: evidence from the attentional blink task.
    Ho C; Mason O; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2007 May; 125(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 16942739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The influence of auditory background stimulation (Mozart's sonata K. 448) on visual brain activity.
    Jausovec N; Habe K
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2004 Feb; 51(3):261-71. PubMed ID: 14962578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of Mozart's music on brain activity in the process of learning.
    Jausovec N; Jausovec K; Gerlic I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Dec; 117(12):2703-14. PubMed ID: 17029951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of Mozart's sonata K. 448 on brain activity during the performance of spatial rotation and numerical tasks.
    Jausovec N; Habe K
    Brain Topogr; 2005; 17(4):207-18. PubMed ID: 16110771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neurophysiological measures of involuntary and voluntary attention allocation and dispositional differences in need for cognition.
    Enge S; Fleischhauer M; Brocke B; Strobel A
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2008 Jun; 34(6):862-74. PubMed ID: 18388253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of music exposure and own genre preference on conscious and unconscious cognitive processes: a pilot ERP study.
    Caldwell GN; Riby LM
    Conscious Cogn; 2007 Dec; 16(4):992-6. PubMed ID: 16931056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Attention rivalry under irrelevant audiovisual stimulation.
    Feng T; Qiu Y; Zhu Y; Tong S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Jun; 438(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 18482799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cortical responses to Mozart's sonata enhance spatial-reasoning ability.
    Suda M; Morimoto K; Obata A; Koizumi H; Maki A
    Neurol Res; 2008 Nov; 30(9):885-8. PubMed ID: 18631433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automatic auditory change detection in humans is influenced by visual-auditory associative learning.
    Laine M; Kwon MS; Hämäläinen H
    Neuroreport; 2007 Oct; 18(16):1697-701. PubMed ID: 17921871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related potential study of novelty processing abnormalities in autism.
    Sokhadze E; Baruth J; Tasman A; Sears L; Mathai G; El-Baz A; Casanova MF
    Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback; 2009 Mar; 34(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 19199028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Electrophysiological evidence of enhanced distractibility in ADHD children.
    Gumenyuk V; Korzyukov O; Escera C; Hämäläinen M; Huotilainen M; Häyrinen T; Oksanen H; Näätänen R; von Wendt L; Alho K
    Neurosci Lett; 2005 Feb; 374(3):212-7. PubMed ID: 15663965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Familiarity affects environmental sound processing outside the focus of attention: an event-related potential study.
    Kirmse U; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):887-96. PubMed ID: 19345610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stimulus complexity effects on the event-related potentials to task-irrelevant stimuli.
    Barkaszi I; Czigler I; Balázs L
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Sep; 94(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 23702457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Caffeine effects on ERPs and performance in an auditory Go/NoGo task.
    Barry RJ; Johnstone SJ; Clarke AR; Rushby JA; Brown CR; McKenzie DN
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2007 Dec; 118(12):2692-9. PubMed ID: 17905651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mozart K.448 and epileptiform discharges: effect of ratio of lower to higher harmonics.
    Lin LC; Lee WT; Wu HC; Tsai CL; Wei RC; Jong YJ; Yang RC
    Epilepsy Res; 2010 May; 89(2-3):238-45. PubMed ID: 20129759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 28.