BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

392 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280763)

  • 21. A Bayesian approach for sample size determination in method comparison studies.
    Yin K; Choudhary PK; Varghese D; Goodman SR
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(13):2273-89. PubMed ID: 17979182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Confidence in polymerase chain reaction diagnosis can be improved by Bayesian estimation of post-test disease probability.
    Kelly P; Pereira-Maxwell F; Carnaby S; White I
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Mar; 58(3):252-60. PubMed ID: 15718114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of small health risks based on exact sample sizes.
    Abt K; Gülich A
    Stat Med; 1996 Jan; 15(2):183-95. PubMed ID: 8614754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A tutorial on a practical Bayesian alternative to null-hypothesis significance testing.
    Masson ME
    Behav Res Methods; 2011 Sep; 43(3):679-90. PubMed ID: 21302025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prior convictions: Bayesian approaches to the analysis and interpretation of clinical megatrials.
    Diamond GA; Kaul S
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Jun; 43(11):1929-39. PubMed ID: 15172393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Bayesian statistics in medicine. Part I: The basic tools].
    Nichelatti M; Montomoli C
    G Ital Nefrol; 2008; 25(3):342-6. PubMed ID: 18473305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Bootstrap estimation of benchmark doses and confidence limits with clustered quantal data.
    Zhu Y; Wang T; Jelsovsky JZ
    Risk Anal; 2007 Apr; 27(2):447-65. PubMed ID: 17511711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A Bayesian predictive two-stage design for phase II clinical trials.
    Sambucini V
    Stat Med; 2008 Apr; 27(8):1199-224. PubMed ID: 17763528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Nonparametric confidence intervals for Tmax in sequence-stratified crossover studies.
    Willavize SA; Morgenthien EA
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):9-19. PubMed ID: 17256803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Probability fold change: a robust computational approach for identifying differentially expressed gene lists.
    Deng X; Xu J; Hui J; Wang C
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2009 Feb; 93(2):124-39. PubMed ID: 18842321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A predictive Bayesian approach to the design and analysis of bridging studies.
    Gould AL; Jin T; Zhang LX; Wang WW
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012 Sep; 22(5):916-34. PubMed ID: 22946940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The Bayesian interpretation of a P-value depends only weakly on statistical power in realistic situations.
    Hooper R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1242-7. PubMed ID: 19398295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Bayesian evaluation of inequality and equality constrained hypotheses for contingency tables.
    Klugkist I; Laudy O; Hoijtink H
    Psychol Methods; 2010 Sep; 15(3):281-99. PubMed ID: 20822253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. On the estimation of the binomial probability in multistage clinical trials.
    Jung SH; Kim KM
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):881-96. PubMed ID: 15027078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian sample size calculations for a non-inferiority test of two proportions in clinical trials.
    Daimon T
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2008 Jul; 29(4):507-16. PubMed ID: 18201944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Bayesian non-inferiority test for two independent binomial proportions.
    Kawasaki Y; Miyaoka E
    Pharm Stat; 2013; 12(4):201-6. PubMed ID: 23625633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Statistical significance--a misconstrued notion in medical research.
    Nurminen M
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1997 Jun; 23(3):232-5. PubMed ID: 9243735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. On estimating the difference between two probabilities, with special reference to clinical trials.
    Anbar D
    Biometrics; 1983 Mar; 39(1):257-62. PubMed ID: 6871355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Nonparametric empirical Bayes method for comparison of treatment effects with application to stress urinary incontinence data.
    Liu C; Shen W; Xie J
    Pharm Stat; 2008; 7(1):42-52. PubMed ID: 17311241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Calculating the main alternatives to null-hypothesis-significance testing in between-subject experimental designs.
    Balluerka Lasa N; Vergara Iraeta AI; Arnau Gras J
    Psicothema; 2009 Feb; 21(1):141-51. PubMed ID: 19178869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.