273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280935)
1. Image browsing in slow medical liquid crystal displays.
Liang H; Park S; Gallas BD; Myers KJ; Badano A
Acad Radiol; 2008 Mar; 15(3):370-82. PubMed ID: 18280935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On-axis and off-axis viewing of images on CRT displays and LCDs: observer performance and vision model predictions.
Krupinski EA; Johnson J; Roehrig H; Nafziger J; Lubin J
Acad Radiol; 2005 Aug; 12(8):957-64. PubMed ID: 16023384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection.
Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detectability decreases with off-normal viewing in medical liquid crystal displays.
Badano A; Gallas BD
Acad Radiol; 2006 Feb; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 16428057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of mass: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a diagnostic setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):623-9. PubMed ID: 18568553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Does the age of liquid crystal displays influence observer performance?
Krupinski EA; Roehrig H; Fan J
Acad Radiol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):463-7. PubMed ID: 17368216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Soft-copy reading in digital mammography of microcalcifications: diagnostic performance of a 5-megapixel cathode ray tube monitor versus a 3-megapixel liquid crystal display monitor in a clinical setting.
Uematsu T; Kasami M; Uchida Y
Acta Radiol; 2007 Sep; 48(7):714-20. PubMed ID: 17729000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital mammography: comparative performance of color LCD and monochrome CRT displays.
Samei E; Poolla A; Ulissey MJ; Lewin JM
Acad Radiol; 2007 May; 14(5):539-46. PubMed ID: 17434067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of low-contrast detectability in thin-collimated modern multidetector CT using an interactive sliding-thin-slab averaging algorithm.
von Falck C; Hartung A; Berndzen F; King B; Galanski M; Shin HO
Invest Radiol; 2008 Apr; 43(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 18340246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Diagnostic detection performance of a simulated nodule in chest computed tomography images and gray and color nuclear medicine images: comparison between a medical liquid crystal display monitor and an ordinary liquid crystal display monitor].
Okumura E; Kamimae R; Miyashita K; Ueda R; Kanmae Y; Kubo M; Shirasaka N; Takeda T; Hashimoto N
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2014 Aug; 70(8):757-67. PubMed ID: 25142386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Using a human visual system model to optimize soft-copy mammography display: influence of veiling glare.
Krupinski EA; Lubin J; Roehrig H; Johnson J; Nafziger J
Acad Radiol; 2006 Mar; 13(3):289-95. PubMed ID: 16488840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of color LCD and medical-grade monochrome LCD displays in diagnostic radiology.
Geijer H; Geijer M; Forsberg L; Kheddache S; Sund P
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Jun; 20(2):114-21. PubMed ID: 17340227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Variations in performance of LCDs are still evident after DICOM gray-scale standard display calibration.
Lowe JM; Brennan PC; Evanoff MG; McEntee MF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jul; 195(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 20566814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of LCD and CRT displays based on efficacy for digital mammography.
Saunders RS; Samei E; Baker J; Delong D; Soo MS; Walsh R; Pisano E; Kuzmiak CM; Pavic D
Acad Radiol; 2006 Nov; 13(11):1317-26. PubMed ID: 17070449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A strategy to qualify the performance of radiographic monitors.
Gutierrez D; Monnin P; Valley JF; Verdun FR
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):192-7. PubMed ID: 15933107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Temporal response of medical liquid crystal displays.
Liang H; Badano A
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):639-46. PubMed ID: 17388181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detectability of BI-RADS category 3 or higher breast lesions and reading time on mammography: comparison between 5-MP and 8-MP LCD monitors.
Yabuuchi H; Kawanami S; Kamitani T; Matsumura T; Yamasaki Y; Morishita J; Honda H
Acta Radiol; 2017 Apr; 58(4):403-407. PubMed ID: 27307027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Channelized Hotelling observers for the assessment of volumetric imaging data sets.
Platiša L; Goossens B; Vansteenkiste E; Park S; Gallas BD; Badano A; Philips W
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2011 Jun; 28(6):1145-63. PubMed ID: 21643400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Recent advances in observer performance methodology: jackknife free-response ROC (JAFROC).
Chakraborty DP
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):26-31. PubMed ID: 15933077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Investigation of the effect of ambient lighting on contrast sensitivity using a novel method for conducting visual research on LCDS.
Sund P; Båth M; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):62-70. PubMed ID: 20211917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
