These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18280956)

  • 21. Evaluation of the root dentine cutting effectiveness of the HERO 642, HERO Apical and HERO Shaper rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; de Figueiredo JA
    Aust Endod J; 2008 Dec; 34(3):94-100. PubMed ID: 19032642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni-Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K-file assessed using computed tomography.
    Taşdemir T; Aydemir H; Inan U; Unal O
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):402-8. PubMed ID: 15910476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Shaping ability of Hero 642 rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals: Part 2.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    Int Endod J; 2000 May; 33(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 11307444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
    J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Assessment of the deviation after biomechanical preparation of the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of root canals instrumented with three HERO rotary systems.
    Câmara AC; Aguiar CM; Poli de Figueiredo JA
    J Endod; 2007 Dec; 33(12):1460-3. PubMed ID: 18037059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The shaping effect of the combination of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Zhang L; Luo HX; Zhou XD; Tan H; Huang DM
    J Endod; 2008 Apr; 34(4):456-8. PubMed ID: 18358896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
    Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Shaping ability of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated L-shaped canals: OneShape, Hero Shaper, and Revo-S.
    Vakili-Gilani P; Tavanafar S; Saleh ARM; Karimpour H
    BMC Oral Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):378. PubMed ID: 34311733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Decrease in the fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments after clinical use in curved root canals.
    Bahia MG; Buono VT
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2005 Aug; 100(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 16037784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Comparative study of hand-held nickel-titanium dental instruments based on the shape of the prepared root canal].
    Szabó J; Serbán T; Nagy G; Madléna M; Ipolyi T
    Fogorv Sz; 2003 Dec; 96(6):273-6. PubMed ID: 14971265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of curved canals preparations using profile, GT and Hero 642 rotary files.
    Garip Y; Gençoğlu N
    J Oral Rehabil; 2006 Feb; 33(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 16457673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Shaping ability and safety of five different rotary nickel-titanium instruments compared with stainless steel hand instrumentation in simulated curved root canals.
    Schirrmeister JF; Strohl C; Altenburger MJ; Wrbas KT; Hellwig E
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Jun; 101(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 16731405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The influence of various automated devices on the shaping ability of Mtwo rotary nickel-titanium instruments.
    Bürklein S; Schäfer E
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):945-51. PubMed ID: 17107539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shaping ability of Lightspeed rotary nickel-titanium instruments in simulated root canals. Part 1.
    Thompson SA; Dummer PM
    J Endod; 1997 Nov; 23(11):698-702. PubMed ID: 9587312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
    Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
    Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of HERO 642 versus Hedström files for removing gutta-percha fillings in curved root canals: an ex vivo study.
    Aydin B; Köse T; Calişkan MK
    Int Endod J; 2009 Nov; 42(11):1050-6. PubMed ID: 19825041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of the shaping effects of 5 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
    Ersev H; Yilmaz B; Ciftçioğlu E; Ozkarsli SF
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 May; 109(5):e86-93. PubMed ID: 20416526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.