180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18281824)
21. Development of a force-reflecting robotic platform for cardiac catheter navigation.
Park JW; Choi J; Pak HN; Song SJ; Lee JC; Park Y; Shin SM; Sun K
Artif Organs; 2010 Nov; 34(11):1034-9. PubMed ID: 21092046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Remote magnetic navigation for atrial fibrillation ablation: is 'As Good as Manual' good enough.
Burkhardt JD; Di Biase L; Natale A
Europace; 2011 Jan; 13(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 21045013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Steerable sheath catheter navigation for ablation of atrial fibrillation: a case-control study.
Piorkowski C; Kottkamp H; Gerds-Li JH; Arya A; Sommer P; Dagres N; Esato M; Riahi S; Weiss S; Kircher S; Hindricks G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 18684284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Remote-controlled catheter ablation of accessory pathways: results from the magnetic laboratory.
Chun JK; Ernst S; Matthews S; Schmidt B; Bansch D; Boczor S; Ujeyl A; Antz M; Ouyang F; Kuck KH
Eur Heart J; 2007 Jan; 28(2):190-5. PubMed ID: 17218451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Initial experience with a telerobotic system to remotely navigate and automatically reposition standard steerable EP catheters.
Cercenelli L; Marcelli E; Plicchi G
ASAIO J; 2007; 53(5):523-9. PubMed ID: 17885323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Initial clinical experience with a remote magnetic catheter navigation system for ablation of cavotricuspid isthmus-dependent right atrial flutter.
Arya A; Kottkamp H; Piorkowski C; Bollmann A; Gerdes-Li JH; Riahi S; Esato M; Hindricks G
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 May; 31(5):597-603. PubMed ID: 18439175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic magnetic navigation for ablation of human arrhythmias: initial experience.
Latcu DG; Ricard P; Zarqane N; Yaici K; Rinaldi JP; Maluski A; Saoudi N
Arch Cardiovasc Dis; 2009 May; 102(5):419-25. PubMed ID: 19520327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Three-dimensional reconstruction and remote navigation for catheter-guided atrial fibrillation ablation. Does it influence procedural outcomes?].
Steven D; Hoffmann B; Rostock T; Drewitz I; Sultan A; Servatius H; Lüker J; Müllerleile K; Willems S
Clin Res Cardiol Suppl; 2011 May; 6():73-7. PubMed ID: 22528181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Atrial fibrillation ablation by aortic retrograde approach using a magnetic navigation system.
Miyazaki S; Nault I; Haïssaguerre M; Hocini M
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2010 Apr; 21(4):455-7. PubMed ID: 20021516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Remote magnetic catheter mapping and ablation of permanent junctional reciprocating tachycardia in a seven-year-old child.
Pflaumer A; Hessling G; Luik A; Wu J; Zrenner B
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2007 Aug; 18(8):882-5. PubMed ID: 17331103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. NaviStar ThermoCool catheter for ventricular tachycardia.
Abdelwahab A; Sapp JL
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2007 May; 4(3):307-14. PubMed ID: 17488225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of steerable sheaths on contact forces and reconnection sites in ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.
Ullah W; Hunter RJ; McLean A; Dhinoja M; Earley MJ; Sporton S; Schilling RJ
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2015 Mar; 26(3):266-73. PubMed ID: 25346514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Remote magnetic navigation-assisted catheter ablation enhances catheter stability and ablation success with lower catheter temperatures.
Davis DR; Tang AS; Gollob MH; Lemery R; Green MS; Birnie DH
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jul; 31(7):893-8. PubMed ID: 18684288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Robotic positioning of standard electrophysiology catheters: a novel approach to catheter robotics.
Knight B; Ayers GM; Cohen TJ
J Invasive Cardiol; 2008 May; 20(5):250-3. PubMed ID: 18460712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The LocaLisa system as the key to shortening the procedure duration and fluoroscopy time during ablation of atrial fibrillation.
Koźluk E; Gawrysiak M; Lodziński P; Kiliszek M; Winkler A; Kochanowski J; Piatkowska A; Kasprzak JD; Kozłowski D; Opolski G
Kardiol Pol; 2008 Jun; 66(6):624-9; discussion 630-1. PubMed ID: 18626831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic navigation for catheter ablation: benefits and challenges.
Aagaard P; Natale A; Di Biase L
Expert Rev Med Devices; 2015 Jul; 12(4):457-69. PubMed ID: 26076371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Flexible robotics: a new paradigm.
Aron M; Haber GP; Desai MM; Gill IS
Curr Opin Urol; 2007 May; 17(3):151-5. PubMed ID: 17414511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation ablation with the multipolar mapping and ablation catheter (Mesh-Bard).
Pratola C; Notarstefano P; Artale P; Baldo E; Toselli T; Ferrari R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2008 Jun; 31(6):753-6. PubMed ID: 18507549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Use of advanced mapping and remote magnetic navigation to ablate left ventricular fascicular tachycardia.
Thornton AS; Res J; Mekel JM; Jordaens LJ
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2006 Jun; 29(6):685-8. PubMed ID: 16784438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The future of atrial fibrillation ablation: new technologies and indications: atrial fibrillation.
Ernst S
Heart; 2009 Feb; 95(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19109519
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
