729 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18283060)
1. Physical image quality comparison of four types of digital detector for chest radiology.
Fernandez JM; Ordiales JM; Guibelalde E; Prieto C; Vano E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 18283060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Patient doses and image quality in digital chest radiology.
Salát D; Nikodemová D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):147-9. PubMed ID: 18321878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patient dose in digital projection radiography.
Compagnone G; Pagan L; Baleni MC; Calzolaio FL; Barozzi L; Bergamini C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):135-7. PubMed ID: 18252850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging.
De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between objective and subjective image quality measurements for a full field digital mammography system.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2006 May; 51(10):2441-63. PubMed ID: 16675862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Digital thoracic radiography--a comparison of digital and analog imaging techniques].
Busch HP
Bildgebung; 1991; 58 Suppl 1():9-12. PubMed ID: 1799858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Image quality and dose management in digital radiography: a new paradigm for optimisation.
Busch HP; Faulkner K
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):143-7. PubMed ID: 16461521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solid-state, flat-panel, digital radiography detectors and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Kengyelics SM; Davies AG
Clin Radiol; 2008 May; 63(5):487-98. PubMed ID: 18374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Amorphous silicon, flat-panel, x-ray detector versus storage phosphor-based computed radiography: contrast-detail phantom study at different tube voltages and detector entrance doses.
Hamer OW; Völk M; Zorger Z; Feuerbach S; Strotzer M
Invest Radiol; 2003 Apr; 38(4):212-20. PubMed ID: 12649645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dose reduction in patients undergoing chest imaging: digital amorphous silicon flat-panel detector radiography versus conventional film-screen radiography and phosphor-based computed radiography.
Bacher K; Smeets P; Bonnarens K; De Hauwere A; Verstraete K; Thierens H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Oct; 181(4):923-9. PubMed ID: 14500203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chest radiography: a comparison of image quality and effective dose using four digital systems.
Pascoal A; Lawinski CP; Mackenzie A; Tabakov S; Lewis CA
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):273-7. PubMed ID: 15933121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The amorphous selenium based flat-panel detector. Clinical experiences].
Schmidt EL; Herbig W
Radiologe; 2003 May; 43(5):374-8. PubMed ID: 12764586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Digital storage phosphor radiography. Doses and image quality].
Salvini E; Pedroli G; Montanari G; Pastori R; Crespi A; Zincone G
Radiol Med; 1994 Jun; 87(6):847-51. PubMed ID: 8041940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of different adaptation strengths on image quality and radiation dose using Siemens Care Dose 4D.
Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):173-9. PubMed ID: 20231163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Advances in computed radiography systems and their physical imaging characteristics.
Cowen AR; Davies AG; Kengyelics SM
Clin Radiol; 2007 Dec; 62(12):1132-41. PubMed ID: 17981160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of four digital and one conventional radiographic image systems for the chest in a patient study with subsequent system optimization].
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Effenberger O; Fessel A; Preuss H; Reissberg S; Scherlach C; Döhring W
Rofo; 2005 Feb; 177(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 15666237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining air kerma from pixel values in digital mammography.
Toroi P; Nieminen MT; Tenkanen-Rautakoski P; Varjonen M
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3865-79. PubMed ID: 19491454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimisation strategies introduced for CR at health care centres in Estonia.
Kepler K; Vladimirov A
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):127-31. PubMed ID: 18252852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
