BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18284129)

  • 1. Modeling the effects of changes in new source review on national SO2 and NOx emissions from electricity-generating units.
    Evans DA; Hobbs BF; Oren C; Palmer KL
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 18284129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accountability analysis of title IV phase 2 of the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
    Morgenstern RD; Harrington W; Shih JS; Bell ML;
    Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Nov; (168):5-35. PubMed ID: 23409509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implications of near-term coal power plant retirement for SO2 and NOX and life cycle GHG emissions.
    Venkatesh A; Jaramillo P; Griffin WM; Matthews HS
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Sep; 46(18):9838-45. PubMed ID: 22888978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Expected ozone benefits of reducing nitrogen oxide (NO
    Vinciguerra T; Bull E; Canty T; He H; Zalewsky E; Woodman M; Aburn G; Ehrman S; Dickerson RR
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):279-291. PubMed ID: 27650304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Benefits of current and future policies on emissions of China's coal-fired power sector indicated by continuous emission monitoring.
    Zhang Y; Bo X; Zhao Y; Nielsen CP
    Environ Pollut; 2019 Aug; 251():415-424. PubMed ID: 31103001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The benefits and costs of reducing emissions from the electricity sector.
    Palmer K; Burtraw D; Shih JS
    J Environ Manage; 2007 Apr; 83(1):115-30. PubMed ID: 16716494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accelerated reduction in SO₂ emissions from the U.S. power sector triggered by changing prices of natural gas.
    Lu X; McElroy MB; Wu G; Nielsen CP
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Jul; 46(14):7882-9. PubMed ID: 22724530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economics of an integrated approach to control SO2, NOX, HCl, and particulate emissions from power plants.
    Shemwell BE; Ergut A; Levendis YA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2002 May; 52(5):521-34. PubMed ID: 12022692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Recent increases in nitrogen oxide (NOx) emissions from coal-fired electric generating units equipped with selective catalytic reduction.
    McNevin TF
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Jan; 66(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 26563500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Regional air quality management aspects of climate change: impact of climate mitigation options on regional air emissions.
    Rudokas J; Miller PJ; Trail MA; Russell AG
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Apr; 49(8):5170-7. PubMed ID: 25803240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Management of NOx and SO2 Emissions in the Texas and Mid-Atlantic Electric Power Systems and Implications for Air Quality.
    McDonald-Buller E; Kimura Y; Craig M; McGaughey G; Allen D; Webster M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Feb; 50(3):1611-9. PubMed ID: 26727552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluation of the first phase of sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxides provisions of the 1990 Clean Air Act: a plant-based approach.
    Freedman M; Jaggi B
    Environ Manage; 2002 Mar; 29(3):437-50. PubMed ID: 11830772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Health and air quality benefits of policies to reduce coal-fired power plant emissions: a case study in North Carolina.
    Li YR; Gibson JM
    Environ Sci Technol; 2014 Sep; 48(17):10019-27. PubMed ID: 25046689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spatially and Temporally Resolved Analysis of Environmental Trade-Offs in Electricity Generation.
    Peer RA; Garrison JB; Timms CP; Sanders KT
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Apr; 50(8):4537-45. PubMed ID: 26967826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Implications of the recent reductions in natural gas prices for emissions of CO2 from the US power sector.
    Lu X; Salovaara J; McElroy MB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2012 Mar; 46(5):3014-21. PubMed ID: 22321206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A case study of the relative effects of power plant nitrogen oxides and sulfur dioxide emission reductions on atmospheric nitrogen deposition.
    Vijayaraghavan K; Seigneur C; Bronson R; Chen SY; Karamchandani P; Walters JT; Jansen JJ; Brandmeyer JE; Knipping EM
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Mar; 60(3):287-93. PubMed ID: 20397558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Air quality accountability: Developing long-term daily time series of pollutant changes and uncertainties in Atlanta, Georgia resulting from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments.
    Henneman LRF; Liu C; Chang H; Mulholland J; Tolbert P; Russell A
    Environ Int; 2019 Feb; 123():522-534. PubMed ID: 30622077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contribution of nitrogen oxide and sulfur dioxide exposure from power plant emissions on respiratory symptom and disease prevalence.
    Amster ED; Haim M; Dubnov J; Broday DM
    Environ Pollut; 2014 Mar; 186():20-8. PubMed ID: 24361356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Are renewables portfolio standards cost-effective emission abatement policy?
    Dobesova K; Apt J; Lave LB
    Environ Sci Technol; 2005 Nov; 39(22):8578-83. PubMed ID: 16323750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.