326 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18284410)
1. Impact of risk factors on the performance of the nuclear matrix protein 22 point-of-care test for bladder cancer detection.
Lotan Y; Shariat SF;
BJU Int; 2008 Jun; 101(11):1362-7. PubMed ID: 18284410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early results of bladder-cancer screening in a high-risk population of heavy smokers.
Steiner H; Bergmeister M; Verdorfer I; Granig T; Mikuz G; Bartsch G; Stoehr B; Brunner A
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):291-6. PubMed ID: 18336612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative evaluation of the nuclear matrix protein, fibronectin, urinary bladder cancer antigen and voided urine cytology in the detection of bladder tumors.
Eissa S; Swellam M; Sadek M; Mourad MS; El Ahmady O; Khalifa A
J Urol; 2002 Aug; 168(2):465-9. PubMed ID: 12131289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of clinical factors, including a point-of-care nuclear matrix protein-22 assay and cytology, on bladder cancer detection.
Lotan Y; Capitanio U; Shariat SF; Hutterer GC; Karakiewicz PI
BJU Int; 2009 May; 103(10):1368-74. PubMed ID: 19338566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. NMP22 is a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Agarwal A
J Urol; 1999 Jan; 161(1):62-5. PubMed ID: 10037369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. NMP22: a sensitive, cost-effective test in patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Zippe C; Pandrangi L; Potts JM; Kursh E; Novick A; Agarwal A
Anticancer Res; 1999; 19(4A):2621-3. PubMed ID: 10470205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Bladder cancer screening in a high risk asymptomatic population using a point of care urine based protein tumor marker.
Lotan Y; Elias K; Svatek RS; Bagrodia A; Nuss G; Moran B; Sagalowsky AI
J Urol; 2009 Jul; 182(1):52-7; discussion 58. PubMed ID: 19450825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of NMP22 BladderChek test and urine cytology for the detection of recurrent bladder cancer.
Kumar A; Kumar R; Gupta NP
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2006 Mar; 36(3):172-5. PubMed ID: 16520358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Urinary cytology and nuclear matrix protein 22 in the detection of bladder cancer recurrence other than transitional cell carcinoma.
Hutterer GC; Karakiewicz PI; Zippe C; Lüdecke G; Boman H; Sanchez-Carbayo M; Casella R; Mian C; Friedrich MG; Eissa S; Akaza H; Serretta V; Hedelin H; Rupesh R; Miyanaga N; Sagalowsky AI; Perrotte P; Lotan Y; Marberger MJ; Shariat SF
BJU Int; 2008 Mar; 101(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18257856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluation of diagnostic strategies for bladder cancer using computed tomography (CT) urography, flexible cystoscopy and voided urine cytology: results for 778 patients from a hospital haematuria clinic.
Blick CG; Nazir SA; Mallett S; Turney BW; Onwu NN; Roberts IS; Crew JP; Cowan NC
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):84-94. PubMed ID: 22122739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. NMP22 BladderChek Test: point-of-care technology with life- and money-saving potential.
Tomera KM
Expert Rev Mol Diagn; 2004 Nov; 4(6):783-94. PubMed ID: 15525221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Urinary NMP22 BladderChek test in the diagnosis of superficial bladder cancer.
Moonen PM; Kiemeney LA; Witjes JA
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):951-6; discussion 956. PubMed ID: 16257108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening and monitoring for bladder cancer: refining the use of NMP22.
Ponsky LE; Sharma S; Pandrangi L; Kedia S; Nelson D; Agarwal A; Zippe CD
J Urol; 2001 Jul; 166(1):75-8. PubMed ID: 11435827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of the sensitivity and specificity of urine cytology, urinary nuclear matrix protein-22 and multitarget fluorescence in situ hybridization assay in the detection of bladder cancer.
Kehinde EO; Al-Mulla F; Kapila K; Anim JT
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2011 Mar; 45(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 21091091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparative evaluation of the diagnostic performance of the BTA stat test, NMP22 and urinary bladder cancer antigen for primary and recurrent bladder tumors.
Giannopoulos A; Manousakas T; Gounari A; Constantinides C; Choremi-Papadopoulou H; Dimopoulos C
J Urol; 2001 Aug; 166(2):470-5. PubMed ID: 11458049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative predictive values of urinary cytology, urinary bladder cancer antigen, CYFRA 21-1 and NMP22 for evaluating symptomatic patients at risk for bladder cancer.
Sánchez-Carbayo M; Urrutia M; Silva JM; Romaní R; De Buitrago JM; Navajo JA
J Urol; 2001 May; 165(5):1462-7. PubMed ID: 11342897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Risk stratification for bladder tumor recurrence, stage and grade by urinary nuclear matrix protein 22 and cytology.
Shariat SF; Casella R; Wians FH; Ashfaq R; Balko J; Sulser T; Gasser TC; Sagalowsky AI
Eur Urol; 2004 Mar; 45(3):304-13; author reply 313. PubMed ID: 15036675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nuclear matrix protein-22: a prospective evaluation in a population at risk for bladder cancer. Results from the UroScreen study.
Huber S; Schwentner C; Taeger D; Pesch B; Nasterlack M; Leng G; Mayer T; Gawrych K; Bonberg N; Pelster M; Johnen G; Bontrup H; Wellhäusser H; Bierfreund HG; Wiens C; Bayer C; Eberle F; Scheuermann B; Kluckert M; Feil G; Brüning T; Stenzl A;
BJU Int; 2012 Sep; 110(5):699-708. PubMed ID: 22313585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The clinical utility of atypical cytology is significantly increased in both screening and monitoring for bladder cancer when indexed with nuclear matrix protein-22.
Raina R; Pahlajani G; Ponsky LE; Agarwal A; Zippe CD
BJU Int; 2008 Aug; 102(3):297-300. PubMed ID: 18702780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suspicious urine cytology (class III) in patients with bladder cancer: should it be considered as negative or positive?
Raitanen MP; Aine RA; Kaasinen ES; Liukkonen TJ; Kylmälä TM; Huhtala H; Tammela TL;
Scand J Urol Nephrol; 2002; 36(3):213-7. PubMed ID: 12201938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
