These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1066 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18284478)

  • 1. Consequences of size structure in the prey for predator-prey dynamics: the composite functional response.
    Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):520-8. PubMed ID: 18284478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predation risk suppresses the positive feedback between size structure and cannibalism.
    Kishida O; Trussell GC; Ohno A; Kuwano S; Ikawa T; Nishimura K
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Nov; 80(6):1278-87. PubMed ID: 21668893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Seasonal shifts in predator body size diversity and trophic interactions in size-structured predator-prey systems.
    Rudolf VH
    J Anim Ecol; 2012 May; 81(3):524-32. PubMed ID: 22191419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicting predation through prey ontogeny using size-dependent functional response models.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM; Warkentin KM; Vonesh JR
    Am Nat; 2011 Jun; 177(6):752-66. PubMed ID: 21597252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Trait-mediated interactions: influence of prey size, density and experience.
    McCoy MW; Bolker BM
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 May; 77(3):478-86. PubMed ID: 18312336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of trout in stream food webs: integrating evidence from field surveys and experiments.
    Meissner K; Muotka T
    J Anim Ecol; 2006 Mar; 75(2):421-33. PubMed ID: 16637995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How does abundance scale with body size in coupled size-structured food webs?
    Blanchard JL; Jennings S; Law R; Castle MD; McCloghrie P; Rochet MJ; Benoît E
    J Anim Ecol; 2009 Jan; 78(1):270-80. PubMed ID: 19120607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of cannibalism on predator-prey dynamics: size-structured interactions and apparent mutualism.
    Rudolf VH
    Ecology; 2008 Jun; 89(6):1650-60. PubMed ID: 18589529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stochastic modelling of prey depletion processes.
    Clerc T; Davison AC; Bersier LF
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Aug; 259(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 19409907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of mortality on predator population size and stability in systems with stage-structured prey.
    Abrams PA; Quince C
    Theor Popul Biol; 2005 Dec; 68(4):253-66. PubMed ID: 16040071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
    Vucic-Pestic O; Rall BC; Kalinkat G; Brose U
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 19845811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Oscillations in a size-structured prey-predator model.
    Bhattacharya S; Martcheva M
    Math Biosci; 2010 Nov; 228(1):31-44. PubMed ID: 20800071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intake rates and the functional response in shorebirds (Charadriiformes) eating macro-invertebrates.
    Goss-Custard JD; West AD; Yates MG; Caldow RW; Stillman RA; Bardsley L; Castilla J; Castro M; Dierschke V; Durell SE; Eichhorn G; Ens BJ; Exo KM; Udayangani-Fernando PU; Ferns PN; Hockey PA; Gill JA; Johnstone I; Kalejta-Summers B; Masero JA; Moreira F; Nagarajan RV; Owens IP; Pacheco C; Perez-Hurtado A; Rogers D; Scheiffarth G; Sitters H; Sutherland WJ; Triplet P; Worrall DH; Zharikov Y; Zwarts L; Pettifor RA
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2006 Nov; 81(4):501-29. PubMed ID: 16863594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Emergent impacts of cannibalism and size refuges in prey on intraguild predation systems.
    Rudolf VH; Armstrong J
    Oecologia; 2008 Oct; 157(4):675-86. PubMed ID: 18690480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ratio- and predator-dependent functional forms for predators optimally foraging in patches.
    Anderson JJ
    Am Nat; 2010 Feb; 175(2):240-9. PubMed ID: 20028238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The anatomy of predator-prey dynamics in a changing climate.
    Wilmers CC; Post E; Hastings A
    J Anim Ecol; 2007 Nov; 76(6):1037-44. PubMed ID: 17922700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Local spatial structure and predator-prey dynamics: counterintuitive effects of prey enrichment.
    Murrell DJ
    Am Nat; 2005 Sep; 166(3):354-67. PubMed ID: 16224690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Group formation stabilizes predator-prey dynamics.
    Fryxell JM; Mosser A; Sinclair AR; Packer C
    Nature; 2007 Oct; 449(7165):1041-3. PubMed ID: 17960242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Size and scaling of predator-prey dynamics.
    Weitz JS; Levin SA
    Ecol Lett; 2006 May; 9(5):548-57. PubMed ID: 16643300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Predator-prey size relationships in an African large-mammal food web.
    Owen-Smith N; Mills MG
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jan; 77(1):173-83. PubMed ID: 18177336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 54.