These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18285024)

  • 1. Pulse-echo single frequency acoustic nonlinearity parameter (B /A) measurement.
    Nikoonahad M; Liu DC
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1990; 37(3):127-34. PubMed ID: 18285024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Contact phase modulation method for acoustic nonlinear parameter measurement in solid.
    Vila M; Vander Meulen F; Dos Santos S; Haumesser L; Bou Matar O
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):1061-5. PubMed ID: 15047429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of measured acoustic power results gained by using three different methods on an ultrasonic low-frequency device.
    Petosić A; Svilar D; Ivancević B
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2011 Mar; 18(2):567-76. PubMed ID: 20850368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An iterative method for the computation of nonlinear, wide-angle, pulsed acoustic fields of medical diagnostic transducers.
    Huijssen J; Verweij MD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jan; 127(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 20058948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double-channel, frequency-steered acoustic transducer with 2-D imaging capabilities.
    Baravelli E; Senesi M; Ruzzene M; De Marchi L; Speciale N
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jul; 58(7):1430-41. PubMed ID: 21768027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evolution equation for nonlinear Scholte waves.
    Gusev VE; Lauriks W; Thoen J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(1):170-8. PubMed ID: 18244169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diffraction effects in the parametric interaction of acoustic waves: application to measurements of the nonlinearity parameter B/A in liquids.
    Barrière C; Royer D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2001 Nov; 48(6):1706-15. PubMed ID: 11800134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling of nonlinear effects and the response of ultrasound contrast micro bubbles: simulation and experiment.
    Kvikliene A; Jurkonis R; Ressner M; Hoff L; Jansson T; Janerot-Sjöberg B; Lukosevicius A; Ask P
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):301-7. PubMed ID: 15047302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Acoustic nonlinearity parameter tomography for biological tissues via parametric array from a circular piston source--theoretical analysis and computer simulations.
    Zhang D; Chen X; Gong X
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Mar; 109(3):1219-25. PubMed ID: 11303935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extensions of nonlinear B/A parameter imaging methods for echo mode.
    Varray F; Basset O; Tortoli P; Cachard C
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Jun; 58(6):1232-44. PubMed ID: 21693405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Wave envelopes method for description of nonlinear acoustic wave propagation.
    Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Lewin PA; Bloomfield PE; Kujawska T; Filipczyński L
    Ultrasonics; 2006 Jul; 44(3):310-29. PubMed ID: 16780911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The diffraction response interpolation method.
    Jespersen SK; Pedersen PC; Wilhjelm JE
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(6):1461-75. PubMed ID: 18249994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Lens-focused transducer modeling using an extended KLM model.
    Maréchal P; Levassort F; Tran-Huu-Hue LP; Lethiecq M
    Ultrasonics; 2007 May; 46(2):155-67. PubMed ID: 17382986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Nonlinear ultrasound propagation through layered liquid and tissue-equivalent media: computational and experimental results at high frequency.
    Williams R; Cherin E; Lam TY; Tavakkoli J; Zemp RJ; Foster FS
    Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5809-24. PubMed ID: 17068366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of elastic nonlinearity using remote laser ultrasonics and CHeap Optical Transducers and dual frequency surface acoustic waves.
    Collison IJ; Stratoudaki T; Clark M; Somekh MG
    Ultrasonics; 2008 Nov; 48(6-7):471-7. PubMed ID: 18722635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nonlinear parameter estimation in water-saturated sandy sediment with difference frequency acoustic wave.
    Kim BN; Yoon SW
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):438-45. PubMed ID: 19138778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Nonlinear effects in the time measurement device based on surface acoustic wave filter excitation.
    Prochazka I; Panek P
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2009 Jul; 80(7):076102. PubMed ID: 19655987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the transmission line model for couplant layer corrections in pulse-echo measurements.
    Sturtevant B; Pantea C; Sinha D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 May; 60(5):943-53. PubMed ID: 23661128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Highly Sensitive Detection of Microstructure Variation Using a Thickness Resonant Transducer and Pulse-Echo Third Harmonic Generation.
    Jeong H; Shin H; Zhang S; Li X
    Materials (Basel); 2023 Jun; 16(13):. PubMed ID: 37445053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the mean acoustic pressure in the cavitation field.
    Campos-Pozuelo C; Granger C; Vanhille C; Moussatov A; Dubus B
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2005 Jan; 12(1-2):79-84. PubMed ID: 15474956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.