These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18285364)

  • 1. Accurate statistical model of comparison between multiple sequence alignments.
    Sadreyev RI; Grishin NV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2008 Apr; 36(7):2240-8. PubMed ID: 18285364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimates of statistical significance for comparison of individual positions in multiple sequence alignments.
    Sadreyev RI; Grishin NV
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2004 Aug; 5():106. PubMed ID: 15296518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Island method for estimating the statistical significance of profile-profile alignment scores.
    Poleksic A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Apr; 10():112. PubMed ID: 19379500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Protein multiple sequence alignment benchmarking through secondary structure prediction.
    Le Q; Sievers F; Higgins DG
    Bioinformatics; 2017 May; 33(9):1331-1337. PubMed ID: 28093407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. PROCAIN: protein profile comparison with assisting information.
    Wang Y; Sadreyev RI; Grishin NV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2009 Jun; 37(11):3522-30. PubMed ID: 19357092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. COMPASS: a tool for comparison of multiple protein alignments with assessment of statistical significance.
    Sadreyev R; Grishin N
    J Mol Biol; 2003 Feb; 326(1):317-36. PubMed ID: 12547212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sensitive pattern discovery with 'fuzzy' alignments of distantly related proteins.
    Heger A; Holm L
    Bioinformatics; 2003; 19 Suppl 1():i130-7. PubMed ID: 12855449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Score distributions of gapped multiple sequence alignments down to the low-probability tail.
    Fieth P; Hartmann AK
    Phys Rev E; 2016 Aug; 94(2-1):022127. PubMed ID: 27627266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Significance of gapped sequence alignments.
    Newberg LA
    J Comput Biol; 2008 Nov; 15(9):1187-94. PubMed ID: 18973434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stochastic pairwise alignments.
    Mückstein U; Hofacker IL; Stadler PF
    Bioinformatics; 2002; 18 Suppl 2():S153-60. PubMed ID: 12385998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Learning generative models for protein fold families.
    Balakrishnan S; Kamisetty H; Carbonell JG; Lee SI; Langmead CJ
    Proteins; 2011 Apr; 79(4):1061-78. PubMed ID: 21268112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Accuracy of structure-based sequence alignment of automatic methods.
    Kim C; Lee B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():355. PubMed ID: 17883866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Protein structure comparison by probability-based matching of secondary structure elements.
    Shih ES; Hwang MJ
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Apr; 19(6):735-41. PubMed ID: 12691985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quantification of secondary structure prediction improvement using multiple alignments.
    Levin JM; Pascarella S; Argos P; Garnier J
    Protein Eng; 1993 Nov; 6(8):849-54. PubMed ID: 8309932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An integrated approach to the analysis and modeling of protein sequences and structures. III. A comparative study of sequence conservation in protein structural families using multiple structural alignments.
    Yang AS; Honig B
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Aug; 301(3):691-711. PubMed ID: 10966778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Improving the quality of twilight-zone alignments.
    Jaroszewski L; Rychlewski L; Godzik A
    Protein Sci; 2000 Aug; 9(8):1487-96. PubMed ID: 10975570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using multiple interdependency to separate functional from phylogenetic correlations in protein alignments.
    Tillier ER; Lui TW
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Apr; 19(6):750-5. PubMed ID: 12691987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mind the gaps: evidence of bias in estimates of multiple sequence alignments.
    Golubchik T; Wise MJ; Easteal S; Jermiin LS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2007 Nov; 24(11):2433-42. PubMed ID: 17709332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Enhanced statistics for local alignment of multiple alignments improves prediction of protein function and structure.
    Frenkel-Morgenstern M; Voet H; Pietrokovski S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):2950-6. PubMed ID: 15870168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of sequence and structure alignments for protein domains.
    Marchler-Bauer A; Panchenko AR; Ariel N; Bryant SH
    Proteins; 2002 Aug; 48(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 12112669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.