BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18285440)

  • 1. Practical issues arising in an exploratory analysis evaluating progression-free survival as a surrogate endpoint for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer.
    Hughes MD
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):487-95. PubMed ID: 18285440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Individual- and trial-level surrogacy in colorectal cancer.
    Buyse M; Burzykowski T; Michiels S; Carroll K
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):467-75. PubMed ID: 18285439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a clinician's perspective.
    Piedbois P; Miller Croswell J
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):519-27. PubMed ID: 18285441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Surrogate end points for median overall survival in metastatic colorectal cancer: literature-based analysis from 39 randomized controlled trials of first-line chemotherapy.
    Tang PA; Bentzen SM; Chen EX; Siu LL
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 25(29):4562-8. PubMed ID: 17876010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Two simple approaches for validating a binary surrogate endpoint using data from multiple trials.
    Baker SG
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):505-14. PubMed ID: 18285436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A simple meta-analytic approach for using a binary surrogate endpoint to predict the effect of intervention on true endpoint.
    Baker SG
    Biostatistics; 2006 Jan; 7(1):58-70. PubMed ID: 15972889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Use of progression-free survival as a surrogate marker in oncology trials: some regulatory issues.
    Chakravarty A; Sridhara R
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 18285437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of meta-analysis for the validation of surrogate endpoints and biomarkers in cancer trials.
    Buyse M
    Cancer J; 2009; 15(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 19826362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of tumor response, disease control, progression-free survival, and time to progression as potential surrogate end points in metastatic breast cancer.
    Burzykowski T; Buyse M; Piccart-Gebhart MJ; Sledge G; Carmichael J; Lück HJ; Mackey JR; Nabholtz JM; Paridaens R; Biganzoli L; Jassem J; Bontenbal M; Bonneterre J; Chan S; Basaran GA; Therasse P
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(12):1987-92. PubMed ID: 18421050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Surrogate endpoint validation: statistical elegance versus clinical relevance.
    Green E; Yothers G; Sargent DJ
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):477-86. PubMed ID: 18285438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Surrogate endpoints for overall survival in early colorectal cancer from the clinician's perspective.
    Grothey A
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Oct; 17(5):529-35. PubMed ID: 18285442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints.
    Lassere MN
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2008 Jun; 17(3):303-40. PubMed ID: 17925313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Design and endpoints of clinical trials in hepatocellular carcinoma.
    Llovet JM; Di Bisceglie AM; Bruix J; Kramer BS; Lencioni R; Zhu AX; Sherman M; Schwartz M; Lotze M; Talwalkar J; Gores GJ;
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 May; 100(10):698-711. PubMed ID: 18477802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the Prentice criterion validate surrogate endpoints?
    Berger VW
    Stat Med; 2004 May; 23(10):1571-8. PubMed ID: 15122737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Analysis of progression-free survival in oncology trials: some common statistical issues.
    Carroll KJ
    Pharm Stat; 2007; 6(2):99-113. PubMed ID: 17243095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validation of surrogate endpoints in digestive oncology].
    Methy N; Bedenne L; Bonnetain F
    Bull Cancer; 2009 May; 96(5):591-5. PubMed ID: 19423485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endpoints and surrogate endpoints in colorectal cancer: a review of recent developments.
    Piedbois P; Buyse M
    Curr Opin Oncol; 2008 Jul; 20(4):466-71. PubMed ID: 18525345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Statistical evaluation of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints: a literature review.
    Weir CJ; Walley RJ
    Stat Med; 2006 Jan; 25(2):183-203. PubMed ID: 16252272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing surrogacy from the joint modelling of multivariate longitudinal data and survival: application to clinical trial data on chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.
    Deslandes E; Chevret S
    Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(30):5411-21. PubMed ID: 18058850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of cancer drugs on survival: often poorly evaluated.
    Prescrire Int; 2009 Aug; 18(102):180-3. PubMed ID: 19746577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.