These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18285917)

  • 1. Myopic deconvolution of adaptive optics images by use of object and point-spread function power spectra.
    Conan JM; Mugnier LM; Fusco T; Michau V; Rousset G
    Appl Opt; 1998 Jul; 37(21):4614-22. PubMed ID: 18285917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Myopic Deconvolution of Adaptive Optics Images by use of Object and Point-Spread Function Power Spectra: Comment.
    Kopeika NS
    Appl Opt; 2000 May; 39(15):2412-4. PubMed ID: 18345151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Myopic deconvolution of adaptive optics images by use of object and point-spread function power spectra: reply to comment.
    Rousset G
    Appl Opt; 2000 May; 39(15):2415-7. PubMed ID: 18345152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Marginal blind deconvolution of adaptive optics retinal images.
    Blanco L; Mugnier LM
    Opt Express; 2011 Nov; 19(23):23227-39. PubMed ID: 22109201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approach for reconstructing anisoplanatic adaptive optics images.
    Aubailly M; Roggemann MC; Schulz TJ
    Appl Opt; 2007 Aug; 46(24):6055-63. PubMed ID: 17712366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. MISTRAL: a myopic edge-preserving image restoration method, with application to astronomical adaptive-optics-corrected long-exposure images.
    Mugnier LM; Fusco T; Conan JM
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2004 Oct; 21(10):1841-54. PubMed ID: 15497412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust Multi-Frame Adaptive Optics Image Restoration Algorithm Using Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Poisson Statistics.
    Li D; Sun C; Yang J; Liu H; Peng J; Zhang L
    Sensors (Basel); 2017 Apr; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 28383503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semi-blind spectral deconvolution with adaptive Tikhonov regularization.
    Yan L; Liu H; Zhong S; Fang H
    Appl Spectrosc; 2012 Nov; 66(11):1334-46. PubMed ID: 23146190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real-time image restoration for space-object imaging.
    Schmidt JD; Jackovitz K; Riley JT; Tellez JA
    Appl Opt; 2019 Sep; 58(25):6983-6995. PubMed ID: 31503672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Image reconstructions with active illumination in strong-turbulence scenarios with single-frame blind deconvolution approaches.
    Holmes R; Gudimetla VSR
    Appl Opt; 2019 Oct; 58(28):7823-7835. PubMed ID: 31674466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Anisoplanatic deconvolution of adaptive optics images.
    Flicker RC; Rigaut FJ
    J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2005 Mar; 22(3):504-13. PubMed ID: 15770988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Two-dimensional blind Bayesian deconvolution of medical ultrasound images.
    Jirík R; Taxt T
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2008 Oct; 55(10):2140-53. PubMed ID: 18986863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A method for local deconvolution.
    Gureyev TE; Nesterets YI; Stevenson AW; Wilkins SW
    Appl Opt; 2003 Nov; 42(32):6488-94. PubMed ID: 14650491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensitivity to point-spread function parameters in medical ultrasound image deconvolution.
    Shin HC; Prager R; Ng J; Gomersall H; Kingsbury N; Treece G; Gee A
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):344-57. PubMed ID: 19068260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Deconvolution of astronomical images using SOR with adaptive relaxation.
    Vorontsov SV; Strakhov VN; Jefferies SM; Borelli KJ
    Opt Express; 2011 Jul; 19(14):13509-24. PubMed ID: 21747506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance analysis of the self-referenced speckle-holography image-reconstruction technique.
    Welsh BM; Vonniederhausern RN
    Appl Opt; 1993 Sep; 32(26):5071-8. PubMed ID: 20856312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Partial volume effect correction in PET using regularized iterative deconvolution with variance control based on local topology.
    Kirov AS; Piao JZ; Schmidtlein CR
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 May; 53(10):2577-91. PubMed ID: 18441414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iterative deconvolution technique for measurements of diffraction-limited images on optical microscopes.
    Lu W; Chang M; Chen PC; Luo WM
    J Mod Opt; 2014 Dec; 61(sup1):S2-S9. PubMed ID: 25774075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Constrained deconvolution from wavefront sensing using the frozen flow hypothesis and complex wavelet regularization.
    Ren Z; Liu J; Liang Y
    Appl Opt; 2022 Jan; 61(2):410-416. PubMed ID: 35200877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Regularization of the image division approach to blind deconvolution.
    Barraza-Felix S; Frieden BR
    Appl Opt; 1999 Apr; 38(11):2232-9. PubMed ID: 18319786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.