BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

498 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18286380)

  • 21. Decline in cervical cancer incidence and mortality in New South Wales in relation to control activities (Australia).
    Taylor R; Morrell S; Mamoon H; Wain G; Ross J
    Cancer Causes Control; 2006 Apr; 17(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 16489537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Invasive cervical cancer: a failure of screening.
    Spayne J; Ackerman I; Milosevic M; Seidenfeld A; Covens A; Paszat L
    Eur J Public Health; 2008 Apr; 18(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 17483491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Association between sexual behavior and cervical cancer screening.
    Smith AM; Heywood W; Ryall R; Shelley JM; Pitts MK; Richters J; Simpson JM; Patrick K
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2011 Jul; 20(7):1091-6. PubMed ID: 21682554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Social and cultural barriers to Papanicolaou test screening in an urban population.
    Behbakht K; Lynch A; Teal S; Degeest K; Massad S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Dec; 104(6):1355-61. PubMed ID: 15572502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Report from the CDC. Pap test intervals used by physicians serving low-income women through the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Cooper CP; Saraiya M; McLean TA; Hannan J; Liesmann JM; Rose SW; Lawson HW
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2005 Oct; 14(8):670-8. PubMed ID: 16232098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Screening differences and risk of cervical cancer in inflammatory bowel disease.
    Hutfless S; Fireman B; Kane S; Herrinton LJ
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Sep; 28(5):598-605. PubMed ID: 18549465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Is a history of trauma associated with a reduced likelihood of cervical cancer screening?
    Farley M; Golding JM; Minkoff JR
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Oct; 51(10):827-31. PubMed ID: 12401150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Organized cervical cancer screening for underpriviledged women].
    Piana L; Leandri FX; Jacqueme B; Heid P; Corti J; Andrac-Meyer L; Sancho-Garnier H
    Bull Cancer; 2007 May; 94(5):461-7. PubMed ID: 17535784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cervical cancer screening program of Paraná: cost-effective model in a developing country.
    Bleggi Torres LF; Werner B; Totsugui J; Collaço LM; Araújo SR; Huçulak M; Boza EJ; Fischer RM; De Laat L; Sobbania LC; Raggio A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Jul; 29(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 12827718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Pressing the key pad: trial of a novel approach to health promotion advice.
    Corkrey R; Parkinson L; Bates L
    Prev Med; 2005 Aug; 41(2):657-66. PubMed ID: 15917066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Case-control study of the effectiveness of mass screening in reducing invasive cervical cancer].
    Makino H; Sato S; Yajima A; Fukao A
    Nihon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi; 1991 Sep; 43(9):1226-32. PubMed ID: 1919184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Papanicolaou smear screening interval and risk of cervical cancer.
    Shy K; Chu J; Mandelson M; Greer B; Figge D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Dec; 74(6):838-43. PubMed ID: 2586947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Invasive cervical cancer among Hispanic and non-Hispanic women--United States, 1992-1999.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
    MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2002 Nov; 51(47):1067-70. PubMed ID: 12500907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Knowledge and use of Pap-smear among HIV-positive women].
    Pavia C; Navarra A; Pisani G; Piselli P; Koehler B; Angeletti C; Ippolito G; Serraino D
    Minerva Ginecol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 16783295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Mass screening for cervical cancer. Experiences after 25 years of voluntary screening and 2 years of organized screening].
    Thoresen SO; Skare GB; Sandvin O
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1997 Aug; 117(18):2613-5. PubMed ID: 9324815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Cost effectiveness of cervical cancer screening strategies in Tunisia].
    Hsaïri M; Fakhfakh R; Ghyoula M; Ben Abdallah M; Achour N
    Tunis Med; 2000 Oct; 78(10):557-61. PubMed ID: 11190738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Risk of cervical abnormalities in women with inflammatory bowel disease: a population-based nested case-control study.
    Singh H; Demers AA; Nugent Z; Mahmud SM; Kliewer EV; Bernstein CN
    Gastroenterology; 2009 Feb; 136(2):451-8. PubMed ID: 18996382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Screening history of women in Malmö with invasive cervical cancer.
    Lindqvist PG; Hellsten C; Rippe A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Mar; 137(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 17210219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of a call/recall system in improving compliance with cervical cancer screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Buehler SK; Parsons WL
    CMAJ; 1997 Sep; 157(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 9294390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Women at risk: papanicolaou smear screening in Florida.
    Vincent AL; Greene JN; Hoercherl S; McTague D
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1997; 84(5):302-7. PubMed ID: 9260433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.