These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18287545)

  • 1. What's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes.
    Gill P; Woolley SM; Fremouw T; Theunissen FE
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):2809-20. PubMed ID: 18287545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Familiar But Unexpected: Effects of Sound Context Statistics on Auditory Responses in the Songbird Forebrain.
    Lu K; Vicario DS
    J Neurosci; 2017 Dec; 37(49):12006-12017. PubMed ID: 29118103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Functional connectivity between auditory areas field L and CLM and song system nucleus HVC in anesthetized zebra finches.
    Shaevitz SS; Theunissen FE
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Nov; 98(5):2747-64. PubMed ID: 17898149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Development of selectivity for natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.
    Amin N; Doupe A; Theunissen FE
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 May; 97(5):3517-31. PubMed ID: 17360830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Principles of auditory processing differ between sensory and premotor structures of the songbird forebrain.
    Soyman E; Vicario DS
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Mar; 117(3):1266-1280. PubMed ID: 28031398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-dependent auditory tuning results in synchronous population coding of vocalizations in the songbird midbrain.
    Woolley SM; Gill PR; Theunissen FE
    J Neurosci; 2006 Mar; 26(9):2499-512. PubMed ID: 16510728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Developmental experience alters information coding in auditory midbrain and forebrain neurons.
    Woolley SM; Hauber ME; Theunissen FE
    Dev Neurobiol; 2010 Mar; 70(4):235-52. PubMed ID: 20039264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Emergence of learned categorical representations within an auditory forebrain circuit.
    Jeanne JM; Thompson JV; Sharpee TO; Gentner TQ
    J Neurosci; 2011 Feb; 31(7):2595-606. PubMed ID: 21325527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Surprising twist on auditory representation. Focus on: "what's that sound? Auditory area CLM encodes stimulus surprise, not intensity or intensity changes".
    Gentner TQ
    J Neurophysiol; 2008 Jun; 99(6):2755-6. PubMed ID: 18544667
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Temporal processing and adaptation in the songbird auditory forebrain.
    Nagel KI; Doupe AJ
    Neuron; 2006 Sep; 51(6):845-59. PubMed ID: 16982428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation power and phase spectrum of natural sounds enhance neural encoding performed by single auditory neurons.
    Hsu A; Woolley SM; Fremouw TE; Theunissen FE
    J Neurosci; 2004 Oct; 24(41):9201-11. PubMed ID: 15483139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.
    Woolley SM; Fremouw TE; Hsu A; Theunissen FE
    Nat Neurosci; 2005 Oct; 8(10):1371-9. PubMed ID: 16136039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hierarchical emergence of sequence sensitivity in the songbird auditory forebrain.
    Ono S; Okanoya K; Seki Y
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2016 Mar; 202(3):163-83. PubMed ID: 26864094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Processing of modulated sounds in the zebra finch auditory midbrain: responses to noise, frequency sweeps, and sinusoidal amplitude modulations.
    Woolley SM; Casseday JH
    J Neurophysiol; 2005 Aug; 94(2):1143-57. PubMed ID: 15817647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal and rate code analysis of responses to low-frequency components in the bird's own song by song system neurons.
    Fukushima M; Rauske PL; Margoliash D
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2015 Dec; 201(12):1103-14. PubMed ID: 26319311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Neural representation of spectral and temporal features of song in the auditory forebrain of zebra finches as revealed by functional MRI.
    Boumans T; Theunissen FE; Poirier C; Van Der Linden A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Nov; 26(9):2613-26. PubMed ID: 17970728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Neurophysiological response selectivity for conspecific songs over synthetic sounds in the auditory forebrain of non-singing female songbirds.
    Hauber ME; Cassey P; Woolley SM; Theunissen FE
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2007 Jul; 193(7):765-74. PubMed ID: 17503053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Functional MRI of auditory responses in the zebra finch forebrain reveals a hierarchical organisation based on signal strength but not selectivity.
    Boumans T; Gobes SM; Poirier C; Theunissen FE; Vandersmissen L; Pintjens W; Verhoye M; Bolhuis JJ; Van der Linden A
    PLoS One; 2008 Sep; 3(9):e3184. PubMed ID: 18781203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Linear and nonlinear auditory response properties of interneurons in a high-order avian vocal motor nucleus during wakefulness.
    Raksin JN; Glaze CM; Smith S; Schmidt MF
    J Neurophysiol; 2012 Apr; 107(8):2185-201. PubMed ID: 22205651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural response of female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) to conspecific, heterospecific, and isolate song depends on early-life song exposure.
    Diez A; Cui A; MacDougall-Shackleton SA
    Behav Processes; 2019 Jun; 163():37-44. PubMed ID: 29274763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.