These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Quantitative proteomics for two-dimensional gels using difference gel electrophoresis. Friedman DB Methods Mol Biol; 2007; 367():219-39. PubMed ID: 17185779 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative Testis Tissue Proteomics Using 2-Dye Versus 3-Dye DIGE Analysis. Holland A Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():185-202. PubMed ID: 29019134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The development of the DIGE system: 2D fluorescence difference gel analysis technology. Marouga R; David S; Hawkins E Anal Bioanal Chem; 2005 Jun; 382(3):669-78. PubMed ID: 15900442 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Alban A; David SO; Bjorkesten L; Andersson C; Sloge E; Lewis S; Currie I Proteomics; 2003 Jan; 3(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 12548632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of highly sensitive fluorescent dyes (CyDye DIGE Fluor saturation dyes) to laser microdissection and two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) for cancer proteomics. Kondo T; Hirohashi S Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(6):2940-56. PubMed ID: 17406554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. DIGE Analysis of Fish Tissues. Nynca J; Dietrich MA; Ciereszko A Methods Mol Biol; 2023; 2596():303-322. PubMed ID: 36378447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. All about DIGE: quantification technology for differential-display 2D-gel proteomics. Lilley KS; Friedman DB Expert Rev Proteomics; 2004 Dec; 1(4):401-9. PubMed ID: 15966837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Alternative experimental design with an applied normalization scheme can improve statistical power in 2D-DIGE experiments. Engelen K; Sifrim A; Van de Plas B; Laukens K; Arckens L; Marchal K J Proteome Res; 2010 Oct; 9(10):4919-26. PubMed ID: 20681517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. DIGE Analysis of Fish Tissues. Nynca J; Dietrich MA; Ciereszko A Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():203-219. PubMed ID: 29019135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis for comparative proteomics profiling. Tannu NS; Hemby SE Nat Protoc; 2006; 1(4):1732-42. PubMed ID: 17487156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. DIGE Analysis of Animal Tissues. Di Luca A; Hamill R; Mullen AM; Elia G Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1664():137-152. PubMed ID: 29019131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving 2D-DIGE protein expression analysis by two-stage linear mixed models: assessing experimental effects in a melanoma cell study. Fernández EA; Girotti MR; López del Olmo JA; Llera AS; Podhajcer OL; Cantet RJ; Balzarini M Bioinformatics; 2008 Dec; 24(23):2706-12. PubMed ID: 18818217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determining a significant change in protein expression with DeCyder during a pair-wise comparison using two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis. Karp NA; Kreil DP; Lilley KS Proteomics; 2004 May; 4(5):1421-32. PubMed ID: 15188411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis for protein profiling. Soluble proteins of the marine bacterium Pirellula sp. strain 1. Gade D; Thiermann J; Markowsky D; Rabus R J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol; 2003; 5(4):240-51. PubMed ID: 12867748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]