These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

759 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18287956)

  • 1. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18783376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing in superior temporal gyrus.
    Domínguez-Borràs J; Trautmann SA; Erhard P; Fehr T; Herrmann M; Escera C
    Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1521-9. PubMed ID: 18996910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tuning the brain for novelty detection under emotional threat: the role of increasing gamma phase-synchronization.
    Garcia-Garcia M; Yordanova J; Kolev V; Domínguez-Borràs J; Escera C
    Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):1038-44. PubMed ID: 19647795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context.
    Garcia-Garcia M; Domínguez-Borràs J; SanMiguel I; Escera C
    Biol Psychol; 2008 Dec; 79(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 18722500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
    SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The valence strength of negative stimuli modulates visual novelty processing: electrophysiological evidence from an event-related potential study.
    Yuan JJ; Yang JM; Meng XX; Yu FQ; Li H
    Neuroscience; 2008 Dec; 157(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18926886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
    Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
    Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Stimulus novelty and emotion perception: the near absence of habituation in the visual cortex.
    Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Codispoti M; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
    Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 16514360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
    Corral MJ; Escera C
    Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Event-related potential study of attention capture by affective sounds.
    Thierry G; Roberts MV
    Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 17314665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
    Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
    Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
    Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
    Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
    Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Age and novelty: event-related potentials to visual stimuli within an auditory oddball--visual detection task.
    Czigler I; Pató L; Poszet E; Balázs L
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 16837090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
    Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
    Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
    Doallo S; Holguín SR; Cadaveira F
    Neuroreport; 2006 Nov; 17(17):1797-801. PubMed ID: 17164667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
    Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
    Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of different negative emotional context on involuntary attention: an ERP study.
    Lv JY; Wang T; Tu S; Zheng F; Qiu J
    Brain Res Bull; 2011 Aug; 86(1-2):106-9. PubMed ID: 21741456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 38.