757 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18287956)
1. Negative emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing.
Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
Neuroreport; 2008 Mar; 19(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 18287956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing: behavioural and electrophysiological evidence.
Domínguez-Borràs J; Garcia-Garcia M; Escera C
Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(6):1199-206. PubMed ID: 18783376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Emotional context enhances auditory novelty processing in superior temporal gyrus.
Domínguez-Borràs J; Trautmann SA; Erhard P; Fehr T; Herrmann M; Escera C
Cereb Cortex; 2009 Jul; 19(7):1521-9. PubMed ID: 18996910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tuning the brain for novelty detection under emotional threat: the role of increasing gamma phase-synchronization.
Garcia-Garcia M; Yordanova J; Kolev V; Domínguez-Borràs J; Escera C
Neuroimage; 2010 Jan; 49(1):1038-44. PubMed ID: 19647795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The selective processing of emotional visual stimuli while detecting auditory targets: an ERP analysis.
Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Bublatzky F; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1230():168-76. PubMed ID: 18662679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence of gender differences in the modulation of distraction by the emotional context.
Garcia-Garcia M; Domínguez-Borràs J; SanMiguel I; Escera C
Biol Psychol; 2008 Dec; 79(3):307-16. PubMed ID: 18722500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. When loading working memory reduces distraction: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence from an auditory-visual distraction paradigm.
SanMiguel I; Corral MJ; Escera C
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jul; 20(7):1131-45. PubMed ID: 18284343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The valence strength of negative stimuli modulates visual novelty processing: electrophysiological evidence from an event-related potential study.
Yuan JJ; Yang JM; Meng XX; Yu FQ; Li H
Neuroscience; 2008 Dec; 157(3):524-31. PubMed ID: 18926886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The time-course of auditory and visual distraction effects in a new crossmodal paradigm.
Bendixen A; Grimm S; Deouell LY; Wetzel N; Mädebach A; Schröger E
Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jun; 48(7):2130-9. PubMed ID: 20385149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Stimulus novelty and emotion perception: the near absence of habituation in the visual cortex.
Schupp HT; Stockburger J; Codispoti M; Junghöfer M; Weike AI; Hamm AO
Neuroreport; 2006 Mar; 17(4):365-9. PubMed ID: 16514360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of sound location on visual task performance and electrophysiological measures of distraction.
Corral MJ; Escera C
Neuroreport; 2008 Oct; 19(15):1535-9. PubMed ID: 18797312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Event-related potential study of attention capture by affective sounds.
Thierry G; Roberts MV
Neuroreport; 2007 Feb; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 17314665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evidence for the auditory P3a reflecting an automatic process: elicitation during highly-focused continuous visual attention.
Muller-Gass A; Macdonald M; Schröger E; Sculthorpe L; Campbell K
Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 1170():71-8. PubMed ID: 17692834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Task switching and novelty processing activate a common neural network for cognitive control.
Barcelo F; Escera C; Corral MJ; Periáñez JA
J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1734-48. PubMed ID: 17014377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task.
Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C
Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age and novelty: event-related potentials to visual stimuli within an auditory oddball--visual detection task.
Czigler I; Pató L; Poszet E; Balázs L
Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Nov; 62(2):290-9. PubMed ID: 16837090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Personal significance is encoded automatically by the human brain: an event-related potential study with ringtones.
Roye A; Jacobsen T; Schröger E
Eur J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 26(3):784-90. PubMed ID: 17634070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Attentional load affects automatic emotional processing: evidence from event-related potentials.
Doallo S; Holguín SR; Cadaveira F
Neuroreport; 2006 Nov; 17(17):1797-801. PubMed ID: 17164667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Perceptual load interacts with stimulus processing across sensory modalities.
Klemen J; Büchel C; Rose M
Eur J Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 29(12):2426-34. PubMed ID: 19490081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of different negative emotional context on involuntary attention: an ERP study.
Lv JY; Wang T; Tu S; Zheng F; Qiu J
Brain Res Bull; 2011 Aug; 86(1-2):106-9. PubMed ID: 21741456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
