These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Model to Select On-Therapy vs Off-Therapy Tests for Patients With Refractory Esophageal or Extraesophageal Symptoms. Patel DA; Sharda R; Choksi YA; Slaughter JC; Higginbotham T; Garrett CG; Francis DO; Ravi K; Hasak S; Katzka D; Gyawali CP; Vaezi MF Gastroenterology; 2018 Dec; 155(6):1729-1740.e1. PubMed ID: 30170117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Physical and pH properties of gastroesophagopharyngeal refluxate: a 24-hour simultaneous ambulatory impedance and pH monitoring study. Kawamura O; Aslam M; Rittmann T; Hofmann C; Shaker R Am J Gastroenterol; 2004 Jun; 99(6):1000-10. PubMed ID: 15180717 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ambulatory combined pH, bile and manometric monitoring of the oesophagus in asymptomatic healthy volunteers. Freedman J; Lindqvist M; Melcher A; Granström L; Näslund E Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Nov; 24(6):368-73. PubMed ID: 15522046 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. 24-hour esophageal pH monitoring in children with pathological acid gastroesophageal reflux: primary and secondary to food allergy. Part I. Intraesophageal pH values in distal channel; preliminary study and control studies--after 1, 2, 4 and 9 years of clinical observation as well as dietary and pharmacological treatment. Semeniuk J; Kaczmarski M Adv Med Sci; 2007; 52():199-205. PubMed ID: 18217419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Laryngopharyngeal reflux: trends in diagnostic interpretation criteria. Richardson BE; Heywood BM; Sims HS; Stoner J; Leopold DA Dysphagia; 2004; 19(4):248-55. PubMed ID: 15667059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Ambulatory 24-hr pH monitoring of esophagus, fundus, and antrum. A new technique for simultaneous study of gastroesophageal and duodenogastric reflux. Mattioli S; Pilotti V; Felice V; Lazzari A; Zannoli R; Bacchi ML; Loria P; Tripodi A; Gozzetti G Dig Dis Sci; 1990 Aug; 35(8):929-38. PubMed ID: 2384038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Indications of 24-h esophageal pH monitoring, capsule pH monitoring, combined pH monitoring with multichannel impedance, esophageal manometry, radiology and scintigraphy in gastroesophageal reflux disease? Vardar R; Keskin M Turk J Gastroenterol; 2017 Dec; 28(Suppl 1):S16-S21. PubMed ID: 29199161 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Abilities of Oropharyngeal pH Tests and Salivary Pepsin Analysis to Discriminate Between Asymptomatic Volunteers and Subjects With Symptoms of Laryngeal Irritation. Yadlapati R; Adkins C; Jaiyeola DM; Lidder AK; Gawron AJ; Tan BK; Shabeeb N; Price CP; Agrawal N; Ellenbogen M; Smith SS; Bove M; Pandolfino JE Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Apr; 14(4):535-542.e2. PubMed ID: 26689899 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Salivary Pepsin Lacks Sensitivity as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Extraesophageal Reflux Disease. Dy F; Amirault J; Mitchell PD; Rosen R J Pediatr; 2016 Oct; 177():53-58. PubMed ID: 27453366 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Which pH threshold is best in esophageal pH monitoring? Schindlbeck NE; Ippisch H; Klauser AG; Müller-Lissner SA Am J Gastroenterol; 1991 Sep; 86(9):1138-41. PubMed ID: 1882791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux procedures. Eubanks TR; Omelanczuk P; Richards C; Pohl D; Pellegrini CA Am J Surg; 2000 May; 179(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 10930488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Postprandial proximal gastric acid pocket and its association with gastroesophageal acid reflux in patients with short-segment Barrett's esophagus. Nian YY; Meng XM; Wu J; Jing FC; Wang XQ; Dang T; Zhang J J Zhejiang Univ Sci B; 2020 Jul; 21(7):581-589. PubMed ID: 32633112 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Esophageal acid exposure in healthy adults in Taiwan: experience with pH step-up method by dual-channel pH-metry. Yi CH; Chen CL; Lin HH; Chen MC Kaohsiung J Med Sci; 2005 Jul; 21(7):299-303. PubMed ID: 16089306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Bravo wireless versus catheter pH monitoring systems. Fox M Gut; 2006 Mar; 55(3):434-5. PubMed ID: 16474112 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Efficacy, diagnostic utility and tolerance of intraesophageal pH ambulatory determination with wireless pH-testing monitoring system]. Carmona-Sánchez R; Solana-Sentíes S Rev Gastroenterol Mex; 2004; 69(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 15757154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. 24 Versus 48-hour bravo pH monitoring. Chander B; Hanley-Williams N; Deng Y; Sheth A J Clin Gastroenterol; 2012 Mar; 46(3):197-200. PubMed ID: 21959323 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Normal values of 24-hour ambulatory esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in a rural South African cohort of healthy participants. Ndebia EJ; Sammon AM; Umapathy E; Iputo JE Dis Esophagus; 2016 May; 29(4):385-91. PubMed ID: 25721534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. pH probe positioning for 24-hour pH-metry by manometry or pH step-up. Pehl C; Boccali I; Hennig M; Schepp W Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2004 Apr; 16(4):375-82. PubMed ID: 15028969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]