These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
429 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18288569)
1. Usefulness and limitations of the Japan Mammography Guidelines for the categorization of microcalcifications. Uematsu T; Kasami M; Yuen S Breast Cancer; 2008; 15(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 18288569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of malignancy risk stratification of microcalcifications detected on mammography: a study based on the 5th edition of BI-RADS. Kim SY; Kim HY; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Sep; 22(9):2895-901. PubMed ID: 25608770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging in screening detected microcalcification lesions of the breast: is there any value? Uematsu T; Yuen S; Kasami M; Uchida Y Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 103(3):269-81. PubMed ID: 17063274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Detection and diagnosis of automated breast ultrasound in patients with BI-RADS category 4 microcalcifications: a retrospective study. Yu LF; Dai CC; Zhu LX; Xu XJ; Yan HJ; Jiang CX; Bao LY BMC Med Imaging; 2024 May; 24(1):126. PubMed ID: 38807064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations. Kettritz U; Morack G; Decker T Eur J Radiol; 2005 Aug; 55(2):270-6. PubMed ID: 16036159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Breast microcalcifications as type descriptors to stratify risk of malignancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 10665 cases with special focus on round/punctate microcalcifications. Rominger M; Wisgickl C; Timmesfeld N Rofo; 2012 Dec; 184(12):1144-52. PubMed ID: 22923222 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of malignant risk stratification for microcalcifications interpreted as "amorphous" morphology on mammography: A study based on the 5th edition of breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Kim D; Kim J; Jung HK; Kim S Eur J Radiol; 2023 May; 162():110795. PubMed ID: 36996721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. "Category 4A" microcalcifications: how should this subcategory be applied to microcalcifications seen on mammography? Kim J; Kim EK; Kim MJ; Moon HJ; Yoon JH Acta Radiol; 2018 Feb; 59(2):147-153. PubMed ID: 28490180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy? Metaxa L; Healy NA; O'Keeffe SA Br J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 92(1103):20190177. PubMed ID: 31365279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of microcalcification descriptors in BI-RADS 4th edition to stratify risk of malignancy. Burnside ES; Ochsner JE; Fowler KJ; Fine JP; Salkowski LR; Rubin DL; Sisney GA Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):388-95. PubMed ID: 17255409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography. Cho N; Moon WK; Cha JH; Kim SM; Jang M; Chang JM; Chung SY Acta Radiol; 2009 Jul; 50(6):602-9. PubMed ID: 19449232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of breast microcalcifications according to Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System criteria and Le Gal's classification. Gülsün M; Demirkazik FB; Ariyürek M Eur J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 47(3):227-31. PubMed ID: 12927667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. What is the predictor for invasion in non-palpable breast cancer with microcalcifications? Nishimura S; Takahashi K; Gomi N; Tada K; Makita M; Tada T; Iwase T; Yoshimoto M; Akiyama F; Sakamoto G; Kasumi F Breast Cancer; 2004; 11(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 14718793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of BI-RADS category 4 lesions detected with screening mammography and screening US: utility of MR imaging. Strobel K; Schrading S; Hansen NL; Barabasch A; Kuhl CK Radiology; 2015 Feb; 274(2):343-51. PubMed ID: 25271857 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System Category 3 mammograms and the use of stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy in a nonacademic community practice. Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E Cancer; 2004 Feb; 100(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 14770425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Stereotactic Mammotome breast biopsy: routine clinical experience and correlation with BI-RADS--classification and histopathology]. Michel SC; Löw R; Singer G; Otto R; Hohl M; Kubik RA Praxis (Bern 1994); 2007 Sep; 96(39):1459-74. PubMed ID: 17966279 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Mammographic features and correlation with biopsy findings using 11-gauge stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (SVABB). Mendez A; Cabanillas F; Echenique M; Malekshamran K; Perez I; Ramos E Ann Oncol; 2004 Mar; 15(3):450-4. PubMed ID: 14998847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic morphology and distribution of calcifications in ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed in organized screening. Hofvind S; Iversen BF; Eriksen L; Styr BM; Kjellevold K; Kurz KD Acta Radiol; 2011 Jun; 52(5):481-7. PubMed ID: 21498306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast MRI as a Problem-solving Study in the Evaluation of BI-RADS Categories 3 and 4 Microcalcifications: Is it Worth Performing? Shimauchi A; Machida Y; Maeda I; Fukuma E; Hoshi K; Tozaki M Acad Radiol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):288-296. PubMed ID: 29191685 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]