151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18289687)
1. Calculation of lipophilicity for Pt(II) complexes: experimental comparison of several methods.
Tetko IV; Jaroszewicz I; Platts JA; Kuduk-Jaworska J
J Inorg Biochem; 2008 Jul; 102(7):1424-37. PubMed ID: 18289687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A comparison of theoretical methods of calculation of partition coefficients for selected drugs.
Pyka A; Babuśka M; Zachariasz M
Acta Pol Pharm; 2006; 63(3):159-67. PubMed ID: 20085219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Computerized logP prediction using fragment methods].
Takácsné NK
Acta Pharm Hung; 1998 Jan; 68(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 9528148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison between immobilized artificial membrane (IAM) HPLC data and lipophilicity in n-octanol for quinolone antibacterial agents.
Barbato F; Cirocco V; Grumetto L; Immacolata La Rotonda M
Eur J Pharm Sci; 2007 Aug; 31(5):288-97. PubMed ID: 17540545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can we estimate the accuracy of ADME-Tox predictions?
Tetko IV; Bruneau P; Mewes HW; Rohrer DC; Poda GI
Drug Discov Today; 2006 Aug; 11(15-16):700-7. PubMed ID: 16846797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Application of ALOGPS 2.1 to predict log D distribution coefficient for Pfizer proprietary compounds.
Tetko IV; Poda GI
J Med Chem; 2004 Nov; 47(23):5601-4. PubMed ID: 15509156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The RP-HPLC measurement and QSPR analysis of logP(o/w) values of several Pt(II) complexes.
Platts JA; Oldfield SP; Reif MM; Palmucci A; Gabano E; Osella D
J Inorg Biochem; 2006 Jul; 100(7):1199-207. PubMed ID: 16530269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the octanol/water partition coefficients calculated by ClogP, ACDlogP and KowWin to experimentally determined values.
Machatha SG; Yalkowsky SH
Int J Pharm; 2005 Apr; 294(1-2):185-92. PubMed ID: 15814243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculation of lipophilicity of a large, diverse dataset of anticancer platinum complexes and the relation to cellular uptake.
Oldfield SP; Hall MD; Platts JA
J Med Chem; 2007 Oct; 50(21):5227-37. PubMed ID: 17900102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting logP of pesticides using different software.
Benfenati E; Gini G; Piclin N; Roncaglioni A; Varì MR
Chemosphere; 2003 Dec; 53(9):1155-64. PubMed ID: 14512120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Lipophilicity of novel antitumour and analgesic active 8-aryl-2,6,7,8-tetrahydroimidazo[2,1-c][1,2,4]triazine-3,4-dione derivatives determined by reversed-phase HPLC and computational methods.
Sztanke K; Markowski W; Swieboda R; Polak B
Eur J Med Chem; 2010 Jun; 45(6):2644-9. PubMed ID: 20172631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Application of quantum chemical approximations to environmental problems: prediction of water solubility for nitro compounds.
Kholod YA; Muratov EN; Gorb LG; Hill FC; Artemenko AG; Kuz'min VE; Qasim M; Leszczynski J
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Dec; 43(24):9208-15. PubMed ID: 20000511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The lipophilicity estimation of 5-arylidene derivatives of (2-thio)hydantoin with antimycobacterial activity.
Lazewska D; Maludziński P; Szymańska E; Kieć-Kononowicz K
Biomed Chromatogr; 2007 Mar; 21(3):291-8. PubMed ID: 17221916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Large-scale evaluation of log P predictors: local corrections may compensate insufficient accuracy and need of experimentally testing every other compound.
Tetko IV; Poda GI; Ostermann C; Mannhold R
Chem Biodivers; 2009 Nov; 6(11):1837-44. PubMed ID: 19937825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of logP for Pt(II) and Pt(IV) complexes: Comparison of statistical and quantum-chemistry based approaches.
Tetko IV; Varbanov HP; Galanski MS; Talmaciu M; Platts JA; Ravera M; Gabano E
J Inorg Biochem; 2016 Mar; 156():1-13. PubMed ID: 26717258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Why are some properties more difficult to predict than others? A study of QSPR models of solubility, melting point, and Log P.
Hughes LD; Palmer DS; Nigsch F; Mitchell JB
J Chem Inf Model; 2008 Jan; 48(1):220-32. PubMed ID: 18186622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical and DFT GIAO quantum-mechanical methods of (13)C chemical shifts prediction: competitors or collaborators?
Elyashberg M; Blinov K; Smurnyy Y; Churanova T; Williams A
Magn Reson Chem; 2010 Mar; 48(3):219-29. PubMed ID: 20108257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Investigation of lipophilicity of anticancer-active thioquinoline derivatives.
Bajda M; Boryczka S; Wietrzyk J; Malawska B
Biomed Chromatogr; 2007 Feb; 21(2):123-31. PubMed ID: 17120300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Iron chelators of the pyridoxal isonicotinoyl hydrazone class. Relationship of the lipophilicity of the apochelator to its ability to mobilize iron from reticulocytes in vitro: reappraisal of reported partition coefficients.
Edward JT; Chubb FL; Sangster J
Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 1997 Dec; 75(12):1362-8. PubMed ID: 9534947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Determination of lipophilicity of novel potential antituberculotic agents using HPLC on monolithic stationary phase and theoretical calculations.
Mrkvicková Z; Kovaríková P; Balíková S; Klimes J
J Pharm Biomed Anal; 2008 Sep; 48(2):310-4. PubMed ID: 18272313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
