These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18290142)

  • 1. The influence of nonlinear fields on miniature hydrophone calibration using the planar scanning technique.
    Corbett SS
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):162-7. PubMed ID: 18290142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Progress in developing a thermal method for measuring the output power of medical ultrasound transducers that exploits the pyroelectric effect.
    Zeqiri B; Zauhar G; Hodnett M; Barrie J
    Ultrasonics; 2011 May; 51(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 21163509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Measurement of diagnostic electronic linear arrays by miniature hydrophone scanning.
    Ide M; Ohdaira E
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):214-9. PubMed ID: 18290147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Calibration of medical ultrasonic equipment-procedures and accuracy assessment.
    Preston RC; Bacon DR; Smith RA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):110-21. PubMed ID: 18290137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic field characterization of a clinical magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound system inside the magnet bore.
    Kothapalli SVVN; Altman MB; Partanen A; Wan L; Gach HM; Straube W; Hallahan DE; Chen H
    Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4890-4899. PubMed ID: 28626862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A computerized system for measuring the acoustic output from diagnostic ultrasound equipment.
    Schafer ME; Lewin PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):102-9. PubMed ID: 18290136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of two calibration methods for ultrasonic hydrophones.
    Gloersen WB; Harris GR; Stewart HF; Lewin PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1982; 8(5):545-8. PubMed ID: 7147468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Development of a PVDF membrane hydrophone for use in air-coupled ultrasonic transducer calibration.
    Galbraith W; Hayward G
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1998; 45(6):1549-58. PubMed ID: 18250002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparative evaluation of three hydrophones and a numerical model in high intensity focused ultrasound fields.
    Haller J; Jenderka KV; Durando G; Shaw A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1121-30. PubMed ID: 22352487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The influence of finite aperture and frequency response of ultrasonic hydrophone probes on the determination of acoustic output.
    Radulescu EG; Lewin PA; Wójcik J; Nowicki A; Berger WA
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):367-72. PubMed ID: 15047313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Calibration of miniature medical ultrasonic hydrophones for frequencies in the range 100 to 500 kHz using an ultrasonically absorbing waveguide.
    Rajagopal S; Zeqiri B; Gélat PN
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2014 May; 61(5):765-78. PubMed ID: 24803021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Membrane hydrophone phase characteristics through nonlinear acoustics measurements.
    Bloomfield PE; Gandhi G; Lewin PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2418-37. PubMed ID: 22083775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The output of pulse-echo ultrasound equipment: a survey of powers, pressures and intensities.
    Duck FA; Starritt HC; Aindow JD; Perkins MA; Hawkins AJ
    Br J Radiol; 1985 Oct; 58(694):989-1001. PubMed ID: 3916078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Determination of sensitivity versus frequency characteristics of miniature ultrasonic hydrophones below 1 MHz using planar scanning technique.
    Devaraju V; Lewin PA; Bleeker H
    J Ultrasound Med; 2002 Mar; 21(3):261-8. PubMed ID: 11883536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of errors in intensity measurements of pulse echo ultrasound using miniature hydrophones.
    Fischella PS; Carson PL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(5):404-11. PubMed ID: 492074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative estimation of ultrasound beam intensities using infrared thermography-Experimental validation.
    Giridhar D; Robinson RA; Liu Y; Sliwa J; Zderic V; Myers MR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jun; 131(6):4283-91. PubMed ID: 22712903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Robust spot-poled membrane hydrophones for measurement of large amplitude pressure waveforms generated by high intensity therapeutic ultrasonic transducers.
    Wilkens V; Sonntag S; Georg O
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Mar; 139(3):1319-32. PubMed ID: 27036269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Practicalities of Obtaining and Using Hydrophone Calibration Data to Derive Pressure Waveforms.
    Hurrell AM; Rajagopal S
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2017 Jan; 64(1):126-140. PubMed ID: 27479961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A discussion of procedures for ultrasonic intensity and power calculations from miniature hydrophone measurements.
    Harris GR
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 1985; 11(6):803-17. PubMed ID: 3913079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Measurement of high intensity focused ultrasound fields by a fiber optic probe hydrophone.
    Zhou Y; Zhai L; Simmons R; Zhong P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Aug; 120(2):676-85. PubMed ID: 16938956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.