These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18290145)

  • 1. Application of time-delay spectrometry for calibration of ultrasonic transducers.
    Pederson PC; Lewin PA; Bjorno L
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):185-205. PubMed ID: 18290145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Interlaboratory evaluation of hydrophone sensitivity calibration from 0.1 to 2 MHz via time delay spectrometry.
    Harris GR; Gammell PM; Lewin PA; Radulescu EG
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Apr; 42(1-9):349-53. PubMed ID: 15047310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A hybrid method for calibrating acoustic arrays.
    Cervenka P; Marchal J
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 Nov; 58(11):2446-60. PubMed ID: 22083777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A technique for the high-speed characterization of ultrasonic transducer insertion loss performance.
    Brown LF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 1993; 29():385-92. PubMed ID: 8329617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time delay spectrometry for hydrophone calibrations below 1 MHz.
    Gammell PM; Harris GR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):L41-6. PubMed ID: 10573913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Application of time delay spectrometry for rough surface characterization.
    Pedersen PC; Grebe A
    Ultrasonics; 2001 Mar; 39(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 11270627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Design and acoustic characterization of limited diffraction ultrasonic devices.
    Aulet A; Núñez I; Moreno E; Eiras JA; Negreira CA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):2737-40. PubMed ID: 21117721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Loss effects on adhesively-bonded multilayer ultrasonic transducers by self-heating.
    Wu Z; Cochran S
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Apr; 50(4-5):508-11. PubMed ID: 19942247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Envelope pulsed ultrasonic distance measurement system based upon amplitude modulation and phase modulation.
    Huang YP; Wang JS; Huang KN; Ho CT; Huang JD; Young MS
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2007 Jun; 78(6):065103. PubMed ID: 17614634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optical calibration for both out-of-plane and in-plane displacement sensitivity of acoustic emission sensors.
    Theobald PD
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Dec; 49(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 19409592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An ultrasonic device for source to skin surface distance measurement in patient setup.
    Feng Y; Allison R; Hu XH; Mota H; Jenkins T; Wolfe ML; Sibata C
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Apr; 61(5):1587-9. PubMed ID: 15817366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental study of the acoustical properties of polymers utilized to construct PVDF ultrasonic transducers and the acousto-electric properties of PVDF and P(VDF/TrFE) films.
    Bloomfield PE; Lo WJ; Lewin PA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2000; 47(6):1397-405. PubMed ID: 18238685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Calibration of hydrophones based on reciprocity and time delay spectrometry.
    Ludwig G; Brendel K
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 1988; 35(2):168-74. PubMed ID: 18290143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A performance analysis of echographic ultrasonic techniques for non-invasive temperature estimation in hyperthermia range using phantoms with scatterers.
    Bazán I; Vazquez M; Ramos A; Vera A; Leija L
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):358-76. PubMed ID: 19100591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modal analysis of the electromechanical conversion in piezoelectric ceramic spherical shells.
    Aronov B; Brown DA; Yan X; Bachand CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Aug; 130(2):753-63. PubMed ID: 21877791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An analytical comparison of ultrasonic array imaging algorithms.
    Velichko A; Wilcox PD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2377-84. PubMed ID: 20370020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of coupled vibrations on the acoustical performance of underwater cylindrical shell transducers.
    Aronov B; Brown DA; Bachand CL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3419-27. PubMed ID: 18247751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modeling of functionally graded piezoelectric ultrasonic transducers.
    Rubio WM; Buiochi F; Adamowski JC; Silva EC
    Ultrasonics; 2009 May; 49(4-5):484-94. PubMed ID: 19230947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Basic considerations of acoustic lenses for ultrasonic transducers.
    Ichinose RM; Machado JC
    Med Prog Technol; 1994; 20(1-2):53-8. PubMed ID: 7968866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Arbitrary shaped, liquid filled reverberators with non-resonant transducers for broadband focusing of ultrasound using Time Reversed Acoustics.
    Sarvazyan A; Fillinger L
    Ultrasonics; 2009 Mar; 49(3):301-5. PubMed ID: 19062060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.