BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18290386)

  • 1. [Advisability of identifying the categories of discrepancy between clinical and postmortem diagnoses].
    Kazantseva IA
    Arkh Patol; 2007; 69(6):56-7. PubMed ID: 18290386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [To categories of discrepancy between clinical and postmortem diagnoses].
    Anichkov NM
    Arkh Patol; 2008; 70(4):56-8. PubMed ID: 18807532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The autopsy as an instrument of quality assessment. Classification of premortem and postmortem diagnostic discrepancies.
    Anderson RE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1984 Jun; 108(6):490-3. PubMed ID: 6547301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Abolishment of the categories of discrepancy between diagnoses is a time dictate].
    Rykov VA
    Arkh Patol; 2009; 71(2):55-7. PubMed ID: 19507582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [An analysis of the quality of the clinical diagnosis based on autopsy data].
    Kazantseva IA; Kanareĭtseva TD; Zelinskaia VV; Iudina EB
    Arkh Patol; 1989; 51(10):50-5. PubMed ID: 2610605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Education research: assessment of neurology resident clinical competencies in the neurology clinic.
    Gotkine M
    Neurology; 2009 Sep; 73(12):998-9; author reply 999. PubMed ID: 19770481
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Quality assurance of the diagnostic process].
    Meland E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1993 May; 113(13):1619-21. PubMed ID: 8337658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [The expediency of identifying the categories of discrepancy between clinical and postmortem diagnoses].
    Cherniaeva AL
    Arkh Patol; 2009; 71(2):61-2. PubMed ID: 19507584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring errors in surgical pathology in real-life practice: defining what does and does not matter.
    Renshaw AA; Gould EW
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2007 Jan; 127(1):144-52. PubMed ID: 17145620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Matters of identifying the categories of discrepancy between diagnoses as a part of the problem of organizing the clinical expert work of a postmortem service].
    Zaĭrat'iants OV
    Arkh Patol; 2009; 71(2):58-61. PubMed ID: 19507583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [An analysis of the quality of polyclinical diagnosis based on autopsy data].
    Babaĭtsev AV
    Klin Med (Mosk); 1992 Jan; 70(1):93-6. PubMed ID: 1535113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of premortem clinical diagnosis and autopsy findings in patients with burns.
    Kallinen O; Partanen TA; Maisniemi K; Böhling T; Tukiainen E; Koljonen V
    Burns; 2008 Aug; 34(5):595-602. PubMed ID: 18395991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Quality of clinical diagnosis: pathological-anatomical criteria].
    Konstantinov GS
    Arkh Patol; 2001; 63(4):48-51. PubMed ID: 11534194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How autopsy can be used in quality assessment.
    Anderson RE
    QA Rev; 1989 Nov; 1(4):2-3. PubMed ID: 10313582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Delays in diagnosis: a problem for quality assurance.
    Brenner LH; Jessee WF
    QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1983 Nov; 9(11):337-44. PubMed ID: 6417590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [The role of autopsies in clinical medicine and in pathology].
    Laissue JA; Altermatt HJ; Schaffner T; Loosli H; Gebbers JO; Truniger B
    Rev Med Suisse Romande; 1992 Oct; 112(10):841-5. PubMed ID: 1439429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Fona's and quality of care].
    Casparie AF
    TVZ; 1988 Nov; 42(22):713-5. PubMed ID: 3145624
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [General medical aspects of diagnostics quality].
    Dimov AS; Maksimov NI
    Klin Med (Mosk); 2008; 86(6):73-6. PubMed ID: 18720718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What factors affect the discrepancy rate between preliminary resident interpretations of neuroimaging studies and the final attending interpretation?
    Chan S
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Jul; 15(7):817-9. PubMed ID: 18572115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinico-pathological discrepancies in the diagnoses of solid malignancies.
    Grinberg LT; Ferraz da Silva LF; Galtarossa Xavier AC; Nascimento Saldiva PH; Mauad T
    Pathol Res Pract; 2008; 204(12):867-73. PubMed ID: 18755553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.