139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18291067)
1. Is magnification necessary to confirm visual inspection of cervical abnormalities? A randomized trial in Peru.
Winkler JL; Lewis K; Del Aguila R; Gonzales M; Delgado JM; Tsu VD; Sellors JW
Rev Panam Salud Publica; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 18291067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Confirmation of cervical neoplasia using a hand-held, lighted magnification device.
Winkler JL; Tsu VD; Bishop A; Scott R; Sellors JW
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Apr; 81(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 12676391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Visual inspection with acetic acid and cytology in the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Kolkata, India.
Basu PS; Sankaranarayanan R; Mandal R; Roy C; Das P; Choudhury D; Bhattacharya D; Chatterjee R; Dutta K; Barik S; Tsu V; Chakrabarti RN; Siddiqi M;
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2003; 13(5):626-32. PubMed ID: 14675346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Can visual inspection with acetic acid under magnification substitute colposcopy in detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in low-resource settings?
Aggarwal P; Batra S; Gandhi G; Zutshi V
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Aug; 284(2):397-403. PubMed ID: 20865420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of triage methods for Kenyan women who screen positive for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid.
Lewis KC; Tsu VD; Dawa A; Kidula NA; Chami IN; Sellors JW
Afr Health Sci; 2011 Sep; 11(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 22275925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Screening and follow-up for cervical cancer prevention in rural Mexico using visual inspection].
Pérez-Cruz E; Winkler JL; Velasco-Mondragón E; Salmerón-Castro J; García F; Davis-Tsu V; Escandón-Romero C; Hernández-Avila M
Salud Publica Mex; 2005; 47(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 15759912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance of a low cost magnifying device, Magnivisualizer, versus colposcope for detection of pre-cancer and cancerous lesions of uterine cervix.
Singh V; Parashari A; Gupta S; Sodhani P; Sehgal A
J Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Oct; 25(4):282-6. PubMed ID: 25142620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of visual inspection with acetic acid as a feasible screening test for cervical neoplasia.
Hasanzadeh M; Esmaeili H; Tabaee S; Samadi F
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Dec; 37(12):1802-6. PubMed ID: 21794002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of low-level magnification in visual inspection with acetic acid for the early detection of cervical neoplasia.
Sankaranarayanan R; Shastri SS; Basu P; Mahé C; Mandal R; Amin G; Roy C; Muwonge R; Goswami S; Das P; Chinoy R; Frappart L; Patil S; Choudhury D; Mukherjee T; Dinshaw K
Cancer Detect Prev; 2004; 28(5):345-51. PubMed ID: 15542259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Concurrent evaluation of visual, cytological and HPV testing as screening methods for the early detection of cervical neoplasia in Mumbai, India.
Shastri SS; Dinshaw K; Amin G; Goswami S; Patil S; Chinoy R; Kane S; Kelkar R; Muwonge R; Mahé C; Ajit D; Sankaranarayanan R
Bull World Health Organ; 2005 Mar; 83(3):186-94. PubMed ID: 15798842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Test characteristics of various screening modalities for cervical cancer: a feasibility study to develop an alternative strategy for resource-limited settings.
Sodhani P; Gupta S; Sharma JK; Parashari A; Halder K; Singh V; Sehgal A
Cytopathology; 2006 Dec; 17(6):348-52. PubMed ID: 17168917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Agreement between visual inspection with acetic acid and Papanicolaou's smear as screening methods for cervical cancer.
Naz U; Hanif S
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Apr; 24(4):228-31. PubMed ID: 24709232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Assessment of 2 cervical screening methods in Mongolia: cervical cytology and visual inspection with acetic acid.
Elit L; Baigal G; Tan J; Munkhtaivan A
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Apr; 10(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 16633236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Test characteristics of visual inspection with 4% acetic acid (VIA) and Lugol's iodine (VILI) in cervical cancer screening in Kerala, India.
Sankaranarayanan R; Wesley R; Thara S; Dhakad N; Chandralekha B; Sebastian P; Chithrathara K; Parkin DM; Nair MK
Int J Cancer; 2003 Sep; 106(3):404-8. PubMed ID: 12845681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Screening for cervical carcinoma using visual inspection with acetic acid.
Abdel-Hady ES; Emam M; Al-Gohary A; Hassan M; Farag MK; Abo-Elkheir M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 May; 93(2):118-22. PubMed ID: 16549069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Visual inspection of cervix with acetic acid: a good alternative to pap smear for cervical cancer screening in resource-limited setting.
Khan M; Sultana SS; Jabeen N; Arain U; Khans S
J Pak Med Assoc; 2015 Feb; 65(2):192-5. PubMed ID: 25842557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cervical cancer screening by simple visual inspection after acetic acid.
Belinson JL; Pretorius RG; Zhang WH; Wu LY; Qiao YL; Elson P
Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Sep; 98(3):441-4. PubMed ID: 11530126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Accuracy of combinations of visual inspection using acetic acid or lugol iodine to detect cervical precancer: a meta-analysis.
Catarino R; Schäfer S; Vassilakos P; Petignat P; Arbyn M
BJOG; 2018 Apr; 125(5):545-553. PubMed ID: 28603909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pooled analysis of the accuracy of five cervical cancer screening tests assessed in eleven studies in Africa and India.
Arbyn M; Sankaranarayanan R; Muwonge R; Keita N; Dolo A; Mbalawa CG; Nouhou H; Sakande B; Wesley R; Somanathan T; Sharma A; Shastri S; Basu P
Int J Cancer; 2008 Jul; 123(1):153-60. PubMed ID: 18404671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cervical Screening by Pap Test and Visual Inspection Enabling Same-Day Biopsy in Low-Resource, High-Risk Communities.
Tao L; Amanguli A; Li F; Wang YH; Yang L; Mohemaiti M; Zhao J; Zou XG; Saimaiti A; Abudu M; Maimaiti M; Chen SY; Abudukelimu R; Maimaiti A; Li SG; Zhang W; Aizimu A; Yang AQ; Wang J; Pang LJ; Cao YG; Gu WY; Zhang WJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Dec; 132(6):1421-1429. PubMed ID: 30399093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
