209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18291695)
1. Black hole artifacts-a new potential pitfall for DXA accuracy?
Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Fineberg N; Tubbs RS; Yester MV
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):266-75. PubMed ID: 18291695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effect of common artifacts lateral to the spine on bone mineral density in the lumbar spine.
Morgan SL; Lopez-Ben R; Nunnally N; Burroughs L; Fineberg N; Tubbs RS; Yester MV
J Clin Densitom; 2008; 11(2):243-9. PubMed ID: 18291694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. "Effect of very dense artifacts on Hologic and general electric bone densitometry results".
Morgan SL; Krueger D; Bassler J; Burroughs L; Borchardt G; Yester M; Binkley N; Redden D
Arch Osteoporos; 2020 May; 15(1):77. PubMed ID: 32436138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Navel jewelry artifacts and intravertebral variation in spine bone densitometry in adolescents and young women.
Ott SM; Ichikawa LE; LaCroix AZ; Scholes D
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(1):84-8. PubMed ID: 18990595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of calcium tablets on interpretation of lumbar spine DXA scans.
Kendler DL; Kiebzak GM; Ambrose CG; Dinu C; Robertson S; Schmeer P; Van Pelt JL
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 16731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of the vertebrae: determining which vertebrae should be scanned].
Rubinacci A; De Ponti A; Moro GL; Sirtori P; Galli L
Radiol Med; 1992 Dec; 84(6):725-30. PubMed ID: 1494672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Regional bone mineral density differences measured by quantitative computed tomography: does the standard clinically used L1-L2 average correlate with the entire lumbosacral spine?
Salzmann SN; Shirahata T; Yang J; Miller CO; Carlson BB; Rentenberger C; Carrino JA; Shue J; Sama AA; Cammisa FP; Girardi FP; Hughes AP
Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):695-702. PubMed ID: 30343044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The difference in spine specimen dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density between in situ and in vitro scans.
Tan JS; Kayanja MM; St Clair SF
Spine J; 2010 Sep; 10(9):784-8. PubMed ID: 20381430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimates of volumetric bone density from projectional measurements improve the discriminatory capability of dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Jergas M; Breitenseher M; Glüer CC; Yu W; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1101-10. PubMed ID: 7484286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry of the calcaneus: comparison with other techniques to assess bone density and value in predicting risk of spine fracture.
Yamada M; Ito M; Hayashi K; Ohki M; Nakamura T
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Dec; 163(6):1435-40. PubMed ID: 7992742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of anomalous vertebral segmentation on measurements of bone mineral density.
Peel NF; Johnson A; Barrington NA; Smith TW; Eastell R
J Bone Miner Res; 1993 Jun; 8(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 8328314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Effect of the Lumbar Vertebral Malpositioning on Bone Mineral Density Measurements of the Lumbar Spine by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry.
Izadyar S; Golbarg S; Takavar A; Zakariaee SS
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(3):277-81. PubMed ID: 26778450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dual X-ray absorptiometry of the lumbar spine: the precision of paired anteroposterior/lateral studies.
Blake GM; Jagathesan T; Herd RJ; Fogelman I
Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):624-30. PubMed ID: 8061995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Influence of osteophytic size on bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry.
Rand T; Schneider B; Grampp S; Wunderbaldinger P; Migsits H; Imhof H
Acta Radiol; 1997 Mar; 38(2):210-3. PubMed ID: 9093153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of DXA scanning of the thoracic spine: cadaveric studies comparing BMC, areal BMD and geometric estimates of volumetric BMD against ash weight and CT measures of bone volume.
Sran MM; Khan KM; Keiver K; Chew JB; McKay HA; Oxland TR
Eur Spine J; 2005 Dec; 14(10):971-6. PubMed ID: 15616862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. DXA estimates of vertebral volumetric bone mineral density in children: potential advantages of paired posteroanterior and lateral scans.
Leonard MB; Shults J; Zemel BS
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):265-73. PubMed ID: 16931343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reproducibility of lateral spine scans using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Larnach TA; Boyd SJ; Smart RC; Butler SP; Rohl PG; Diamond TH
Calcif Tissue Int; 1992 Oct; 51(4):255-8. PubMed ID: 1422969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic value of estimated volumetric bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in osteoporosis.
Peel NF; Eastell R
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Mar; 9(3):317-20. PubMed ID: 8191924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Vertebral Bone Density Measurements by DXA are Influenced by Hepatic Iron Overload in Patients with Hemoglobinopathies.
Allard HM; Calvelli L; Weyhmiller MG; Gildengorin G; Fung EB
J Clin Densitom; 2019; 22(3):329-337. PubMed ID: 30122533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Discrepancies between vertebral bone density values: the least dense vertebra.
Mylonakis A; Hadjidakis D; Katsavochristos P; Androulakis II; Sfakianakis M; Raptis SA
Maturitas; 2006 Mar; 53(4):476-82. PubMed ID: 16203114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
