These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 18292478)

  • 1. CT colonography and computer-aided detection: effect of false-positive results on reader specificity and reading efficiency in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Taylor SA; Greenhalgh R; Ilangovan R; Tam E; Sahni VA; Burling D; Zhang J; Bassett P; Pickhardt PJ; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Apr; 247(1):133-40. PubMed ID: 18292478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Brittenden J; Lenton J; Lambie H; Goldstone A; Wylie PN; Tolan D; Burling D; Honeyfield L; Bassett P; Halligan S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jun; 192(6):1682-9. PubMed ID: 19457835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: investigation of the optimum reader paradigm by using computer-aided detection software.
    Taylor SA; Charman SC; Lefere P; McFarland EG; Paulson EK; Yee J; Aslam R; Barlow JM; Gupta A; Kim DH; Miller CM; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):463-71. PubMed ID: 18094263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection.
    Shi R; Schraedley-Desmond P; Napel S; Olcott EW; Jeffrey RB; Yee J; Zalis ME; Margolis D; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Sundaram P; Beaulieu CF
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):768-76. PubMed ID: 16714460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CT colonography with computer-aided polyp detection: volume and attenuation thresholds to reduce false-positive findings owing to the ileocecal valve.
    O'Connor SD; Summers RM; Yao J; Pickhardt PJ; Choi JR
    Radiology; 2006 Nov; 241(2):426-32. PubMed ID: 17005773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. CT colonography: preliminary assessment of a double-read paradigm that uses computer-aided detection as the first reader.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Segnan N; Laghi A; Iafrate F; Campanella D; Neri E; Cerri F; Hassan C; Regge D
    Radiology; 2013 Sep; 268(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23630310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polyp characteristics correctly annotated by computer-aided detection software but ignored by reporting radiologists during CT colonography.
    Taylor SA; Robinson C; Boone D; Honeyfield L; Halligan S
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):715-23. PubMed ID: 19789221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software.
    Taylor SA; Halligan S; Slater A; Goh V; Burling DN; Roddie ME; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Radiology; 2006 Jun; 239(3):759-67. PubMed ID: 16543593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Pulmonary nodules on multi-detector row CT scans: performance comparison of radiologists and computer-aided detection.
    Rubin GD; Lyo JK; Paik DS; Sherbondy AJ; Chow LC; Leung AN; Mindelzun R; Schraedley-Desmond PK; Zinck SE; Naidich DP; Napel S
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):274-83. PubMed ID: 15537839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
    Dachman AH; Obuchowski NA; Hoffmeister JW; Hinshaw JL; Frew MI; Winter TC; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 20663975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection for computed tomographic colonography screening: a prospective comparison of a double-reading paradigm with first-reader computer-aided detection against second-reader computer-aided detection.
    Iussich G; Correale L; Senore C; Hassan C; Segnan N; Campanella D; Bert A; Galatola G; Laudi C; Regge D
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Mar; 49(3):173-82. PubMed ID: 24442160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Colorectal polyps: stand-alone performance of computer-aided detection in a large asymptomatic screening population.
    Lawrence EM; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Robbins JB
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):791-8. PubMed ID: 20663973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
    Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. CT colonography computer-aided polyp detection: Effect on radiologist observers of polyp identification by CAD on both the supine and prone scans.
    Summers RM; Liu J; Rehani B; Stafford P; Brown L; Louie A; Barlow DS; Jensen DW; Cash B; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ; Petrick N
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):948-59. PubMed ID: 20542452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study.
    Kim SH; Lee JM; Lee JG; Kim JH; Lefere PA; Han JK; Choi BI
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):41-51. PubMed ID: 17579150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sources of false positives in computer-assisted CT colonography.
    Näppi JJ; Nagata K
    Abdom Imaging; 2011 Apr; 36(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 20473667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.